Abstract
Objective: Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is a rare form of extragenital endometriosis that usually develops in association with a prior surgical scar. The purpose of the study was to review the clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients with AWE.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in a Gynecology Department of a Portuguese tertiary hospital, concerning patients with histologic-proven AWE, between January 2012 and December 2020 (n = 22). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27.00, with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results: The most common locations of extrapelvic endometrial ectopic implants were cesarean delivery scar (n = 13, 59.1%) and the umbilicus (n = 5, 22.7%). The median (range) age was 36 (30-42) years old, and all patients had a history of previous surgery but one. Nineteen patients had undergone a previous cesarean section, and the mean (range) time from surgery to the onset of symptoms was 100 (32-168) months. All patients were symptomatic and presented with a palpable mass at physical examination. The majority complained of a painful abdominal mass (n = 20, 90.9%) which was associated with cyclic pain in thirteen patients (65%). Ultrasound scan was performed in all patients and the nodules had a median size of 20.5 mm (5-93 mm). One patient received hormonal therapy and surgical resection was performed in the remaining patients. The nodule’s median (range) size was 31 (12-50) mm on gross examination.
Conclusion: AWE should be considered in the presence of a previous pelvic surgery history associated with abdominal scar cyclic pain and swelling. A careful history and clinical examination are essential for diagnosis to avoid unnecessary delay before surgical intervention.
Keywords: Abdominal endometriosis, endometriosis, umbilical endometriosis, scar endometriosis, cesarean section, pelvic surgery.
[PMID: 33763680]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56120727] [PMID: 33371515]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0711-8] [PMID: 30658623]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.005] [PMID: 28104496]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.11.024] [PMID: 29310043]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu-1248] [PMID: 29197920]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170093] [PMID: 29320327]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2018.2659] [PMID: 29285999]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-020-02492-9] [PMID: 32892752]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.004] [PMID: 31618674]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9302376]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.054] [PMID: 32623253]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1305333] [PMID: 28395567]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.90922] [PMID: 29662714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.03.107] [PMID: 28606452]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603965] [PMID: 28637058]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1666-1] [PMID: 30003273]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.021] [PMID: 30965115]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14522] [PMID: 33078482]