Nutritional Culturomics and Big Data: Macroscopic Patterns of Change in Food, Nutrition and Diet Choices

Author(s): Andreas Y. Troumbis, Maria Hatziantoniou, Georgios K. Vasios*.

Journal Name: Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

Volume 20 , Issue 10 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background & Objective: Nutritional culturomics (NCs) is a specific focus area of culturomics epistemology developing digital humanities and computational linguistics approaches to search for macro-patterns of public interest in food, nutrition and diet choice as a major component of cultural evolution. Cultural evolution is considered as a driver at the interface of environmental and food science, economy and policy.

Methods: The paper presents an epistemic programme that builds on the use of big data from webbased services such as Google Trends, Google Adwords or Google Books Ngram Viewer.

Results: A comparison of clearly defined NCs in terms of geography, culture, linguistics, literacy, technological setups or time period might be used to reveal variations and singularities in public’s behavior in terms of adaptation and mitigation policies in the agri-food and public health sectors.

Conclusion: The proposed NC programme is developed along major axes: (1) the definition of an NC; (2) the reconstruction of food and diet histories; (3) the nutrition related epidemiology; (4) the understanding of variability of NCs; (5) the methodological diversification of NCs; (6) the quantifiable limitations and flaws of NCs. A series of indicative examples are presented regarding these NC epistemology components.

Keywords: Culturomics, quality of Life, google trends, N-grams, food, nutrition, diet.

[1]
Buttel, F.H. Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 2000, 31(1), 57-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00044-5]
[2]
United Nations (UN) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UN, 2015.Available from:. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication (Accessed July 20, 2018)
[3]
Díaz, S.; Demissew, S.; Carabias, J.; Joly, C.; Lonsdale, M.; Ash, N.; Larigauderie, A.; Adhikari, J.R.; Arico, S.; Báldi, A.; Bartuska, A.; Baste, I.A.; Bilgin, A.; Brondizio, E.; Chan, K.M.A.; Figueroa, V.E.; Duraiappah, A.; Fischer, M.; Hill, R.; Koetz, T.; Leadley, P.; Lyver, P.; Mace, G.M.; Martin-Lopez, B.; Okumura, M.; Pacheco, D.; Pascual, U.; Pérez, E.S.; Reyers, B.; Roth, E.; Saito, O.; Scholes, R.J.; Sharma, N.; Tallis, H.; Thaman, R.; Watson, R.; Yahara, T.; Hamid, Z.A.; Akosim, C.; Al-Hafedh, Y.; Allahverdiyev, R.; Amankwah, E.; Asah, T.S.; Asfaw, Z.; Bartus, G.; Brooks, A.L.; Caillaux, J.; Dalle, G.; Darnaedi, D.; Driver, A.; Erpul, G.; Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P.; Failler, P.; Fouda, A.M.M.; Fu, B.; Gundimeda, H.; Hashimoto, S.; Homer, F.; Lavorel, S.; Lichtenstein, G.; Mala, W.A.; Mandivenyi, W.; Matczak, P.; Mbizvo, C.; Mehrdadi, M.; Metzger, J.P.; Mikissa, J.B.; Moller, H.; Mooney, H.A.; Mumby, P.; Nagendra, H.; Nesshover, C.; Oteng-Yeboah, A.A.; Pataki, G.; Roué, M.; Rubis, J.; Schultz, M.; Smith, P.; Sumaila, R.; Takeuchi, K.; Thomas, S.; Verma, M.; Yeo-Chang, Y.; Zlatanova, D. The IPBES conceptual framework - connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2015, 14, 1-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002]
[4]
Rogers, D.S.; Duraiappah, A.K.; Antons, D.C.; Munoz, P.; Bai, X.; Fragkias, M.; Gutscher, H. A vision for human well-being: transition to social sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2012, 4(1), 61-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.013]
[5]
Petit, G.; Sablayrolles, C.; Yannou-Le Bris, G. Combining eco-social and environmental indicators to assess the sustainability performance of a food value chain: A case study. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 191, 135-143.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.156]
[6]
Steinhauser, J.; Hamm, U. Consumer and product-specific characteristics influencing the effects of nutrition, health and risk reduction claims on preferences and purchase behavior - A systematic review. Appetite, 2018, 127, 303-323.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.012]
[7]
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, 2005.
[8]
FAO. The future of food and agriculture - Trends and Challenges; United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, 2017.
[9]
Heywood, V.H. Ethnopharmacology, food production, nutrition and biodiversity conservation: Towards a sustainable future for indigenous peoples. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2011, 137(1), 1-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.05.027]
[10]
Vanhonacker, F.; Van Loo, E.J.; Gellynck, X.; Verbeke, W. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite, 2013, 62, 7-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.003]
[11]
Hill, S.; Mao, J.; Ungar, L.; Hennessy, S.; Leonard, C.E.; Holmes, J. Natural supplements for H1N1 influenza: Retrospective observational infodemiology study of information and search activity on the Internet. J. Med. Internet Res., 2011, 13(2)e36
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1722]
[12]
Nakano, M.; Sato, H.; Watanabe, T.; Takano, K.; Sagane, Y. Mining online activity data to understand food consumption behavior: A case of Asian fish sauce among Japanese consumers. Food Science & Nutrition, 2018, 6(4), 791-799.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.622]
[13]
Yadav, S. The wholeness in suffix -omics, -omes, and the word om. J. Biomol. Tech., 2007, 18(5), 277.
[14]
Lockhart, D.J.; Winzeler, E.A. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature, 2000, 405(6788), 827-836.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35015701]
[15]
Elgendy, N.; Elragal, A. Big Data Analytics: A Literature Review Paper Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014, 8557LNAI. , 214-227. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08976-8_16
[16]
Berger, B.; Peng, J.; Singh, M. Computational solutions for omics data. Nat. Rev. Genet., 2013, 14(5), 333-346.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3433]
[17]
Michel, J-B.; Shen, Y.K.; Aiden, A.P.; Veres, A.; Gray, M.K. The Google Books Team. Pickett, J.P.; Hoiberg, D.; Clancy, D.; Norvig, P.; Orwant, J.; Pinker, S.; Nowak, M.A.; Aiden, E.L. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 2011, 331(6014), 176-182.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644]
[18]
Lansdall-Welfare, T.; Sudhahar, S.; Thompson, J.; Lewis, J. Find My Past Newspaper Team. Cristianini, N. Content analysis of 150 years of British periodicals PNAS, 2017, 114(4), E457-E465.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606380114]
[19]
Christianini, N.; Lansdall-Welfare, T.; Dato, G. Large-scale content analysis of historical newspapers in the town of Gorizia 1873-1914. Historic Methods: J. Quant. Interdisciplin. History, 2018, 51(3), 139-164.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2018.1443862]
[20]
Gao, J.; Hu, J.; Mao, X.; Perc, M. Culturomics meets random fractal theory: insights into long-range correlations of social and natural phenomena over the past two centuries. J. R. Soc. Interface, 2012, 9(73), 1956-1964.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0846]
[21]
Petersen, A.M.; Tenenbaum, J.N.; Havlin, S.; Stanley, H.E.; Perc, M. Languages cool as they expand: Allometric scaling and the decreasing need for new words. Sci. Rep., 2012, 2, 943.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00943]
[22]
Marriner, N.; Morhange, C. Data mining the intellectual revival of ‘catastrophic’ mother Nature. Found. Sci., 2013, 18(2), 245-257.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9299-2]
[23]
Ladle, R.J.; Correia, R.A.; Do, Y.; Joo, G-J.; Malhado, A.C.M.; Proulx, R.; Roberge, J-M.; Jepson, P. Conservation culturomics. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2016, 14(5), 269-275.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fee.1260]
[24]
Correia, R.A.; Jepson, P.R.; Malhado, A.C.M.; Ladle, R.J. Familiarity breeds content: Assessing bird species popularity with culturomics. PeerJ, 2016, 4e1728
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1728]
[25]
Correia, R.A.; Jepson, P.; Malhado, A.C.M.; Ladle, R.J. Internet scientific name frequency as an indicator of cultural salience of biodiversity. Ecologic. Indic., 2017, 78, 549-555.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.052]
[26]
Troumbis, Y.A. Declining google trends of public interest in biodiversity: Semantics, statistics or traceability of changing priorities? Biodivers. Conserv., 2017a, 26(6), 1495-1505.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1294-z]
[27]
Troumbis, Y.A. Google Trends and cycles of public interest in biodiversity: the animal spirits effect. Biodivers. Conserv., 2017b, 26(14), 3421-3443.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1413-x]
[28]
Sutherland, W.J.; Butchart, S.H.M.; Connor, B.; Culshaw, C.; Dicks, L.V.; Dinsdale, J.; Doran, H.; Entwistle, A.C.; Fleishman, E.; Gibbons, D.W.; Jiang, Z.; Keim, B.; Le Roux, X.; Lickorish, F.A.; Markillie, P.; Monk, K.A.; Mortimer, D.; Pearce-Higgins, J.W.; Peck, L.S.; Pretty, J.; Seymour, C.L.; Spalding, M.D.; Tonneijck, F.H.; Gleave, R.A.A. 2018 horizon scan of emerging issues for global conservation and biological diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2018, 33(1), 47-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.006]
[29]
Funk, S.M.; Rusowsky, D. The importance of cultural knowledge and scale for analysing internet search data as a proxy for public interest toward the environment. Biodivers. Conserv., 2014, 23(12), 3101-3112.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0767-6]
[30]
McCallum, M.L.; Bury, G.W. Public interest in the environment is falling: a response to Ficetola (2013). Biodivers. Conserv., 2014, 23(4), 1057-1062.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0640-7]
[31]
Andrew, L.; Arndt, D.; Beristain, N.; Cass, T.; Clow, T.; Colmenares, B.; Damm, K.; Hatcher, R.; Jackson, N.; Pasquesi, W.; Chamberlain-Pham, N.; Pryde, J.A.; Rund, T.; Russell, G.; Ryle, C.; Schmidt, T.; Sigan, S.; Sinkus, K.; Sneyd, K.; Strode, J.; Wallen, C.; McCallum, M.L. Changes in United States’ citizens’ interest in sustainability (2004-2014). Life Excit. Biol., 2016, 4(3), 138-164.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.9784/LEB4(3)Andrew.01]
[32]
Nghiem, L.T.P.; Papworth, S.K.; Lim, F.K.S.; Carrasco, L.R. Analysis of the capacity of Google Trends to measure interest in conservation topics and the role of online news. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3)e0152802
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152802]
[33]
Ficetola, G.F. Is interest toward the environment really declining? The complexity of analyzing trends using internet search data. Biodivers. Conserv., 2013, 22(12), 2983-2988.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0552-y]
[34]
Preis, T.; Moat, H.S.; Stanley, H.E. Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1684.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01684]
[35]
Kristoufek, L. BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era. Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 3415.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep03415]
[36]
Ginsberg, J.; Mohebbi, M.H.; Patel, R.S.; Brammer, L.; Smolinski, M.S.; Brilliant, L. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature, 2009, 457(7232), 1012-1014.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07634]
[37]
Mccallum, M.L.; Bury, G.W. Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodivers. Conserv., 2013, 22(6-7), 1355-1367.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0476-6]
[38]
Butler, D. When Google got flu wrong. Nature, 2013, 494(7436), 155-156.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/494155a]
[39]
Richette, P.; Bardin, T. Gout. Lancet, 2010, 375(9711), 318-328.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60883-7]
[40]
Chen, L.X.; Schumacher, H.R. Gout: An evidence-based review. J. Clin. Rheumatol., 2008, 14(5)(Suppl.), S55-S62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181896921]
[41]
Micha, R.; Coates, J.; Leclercq, C.; Charrondiere, U.R.; Mozaffarian, D. Global dietary surveillance: Data gaps and challenges. Food Nutr. Bull., 2018, 39(2), 175-205.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0379572117752986]
[42]
Wit, E-J.C.; Gillette, M. What is linguistic redundancy?; Research Paper / Technical reportThe University of Chicago, 1999. Available from:. http://www.math.rug.nl/~ernst/linguistics/redundancy3.pdf (Accessed July 10, 2018)
[43]
Westgate, M.J.; Lindenmayer, D.B. The difficulties of systematic reviews. Conserv. Biol., 2017, 31(5), 1002-1007.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12890]
[44]
Nelson, K.M.; Dahlin, J.L.; Bisson, J.; Graham, J.; Pauli, G.F.; Walters, M.A. The essential medicinal chemistry of curcumin. J. Med. Chem., 2017, 60(5), 1620-1637.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975]
[45]
Cancer Research UK. Aloe; General cancer information 2015.Available from:. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/ cancer-in-general/treatment/complementary-alternative-therapies/ individual-therapies/aloe (Accessed July 18, 2018)
[46]
Psaltopoulou, T.; Kosti, R.I.; Haidopoulos, D.; Dimopoulos, M.; Panagiotakos, D.B. Olive oil intake is inversely related to cancer prevalence: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of 13800 patients and 23340 controls in 19 observational studies. Lipids Health Dis., 2011, 10, 127.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-10-127]
[47]
Correia, R.A. Google trends data need validation: Comment on Durmuşoğlu (2017). Human Ecologic. Risk Assessment: Int. J., 2018, 1-4
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1446322]
[48]
Wilde, G.R.; Pope, K.L. Worldwide trends in fishing interest indicated by internet search volume. Fish. Manag. Ecol., 2013, 20(2-3), 211-222.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fme.12009]
[49]
Anderson, C. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete; Wired magazine, June 23, 2008. Available from:. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/ magazine/16-07/pb_theory (Accessed July 15, 2018)
[50]
Silver, N. The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail - but Some Don’t; The Penguin Press: New York, 2012.
[51]
Nelson, G.C.; Bennett, E.; Asefaw Berhe, A.; Cassman, K.G.; DeFries, R.; Dietz, T.; Dobson, A.; Dobermann, A.; Janetos, A.; Levy, M.; Marco, D.; Nakicenovic, N.; O’Neill, B.; Norgaard, R.; Petschel-Held, G.; Ojima, D.; Pingali, P.; Watson, R.; Zurek, M. Drivers of change in ecosystem condition and services In: Ecosystems and human well-being, Vol. 2: Scenario; Carpenter, S.R., Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Eds.. Island Press: Washington DC,, 2005; pp. 173-222.
[52]
Dietz, S.; Adger, W.N. Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. J. Environ. Manage., 2003, 68(1), 23-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00231-1]
[53]
Mills, J.H.; Waite, T.A. Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ., 2009, 68(7), 2087-2095.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.017]
[54]
Rieskamp, J.; Busemeyer, J.R.; Mellers, B.A. Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice. J. Econ. Lit., 2006, 44(3), 631-661.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.3.631]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 20
ISSUE: 10
Year: 2019
Page: [895 - 908]
Pages: 14
DOI: 10.2174/1389201020666190211125550
Price: $58

Article Metrics

PDF: 14
HTML: 2
EPUB: 1
PRC: 1