Although the recent wide adoption of minimal invasive procedures for major oncological pelvic surgery and benign prostatic
hyperplasia (BPH) has provided improved functional and oncological outcomes, post-op sexual dysfunction rates remain
high. Can the postoperative use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) offer remedy of erectile function after oncologic
pelvic surgery and do we have evidence for newer PDE5i categories? What is the impact of ablative surgery for BPH to sexual
dysfunction and what treatment choices urologists have in their armamentarium? Moreover, at a time where endourology is
flourishing is there a still place for phytotherapy and herbal agents for the management of kidney stones? Do the pros of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) outweight the cons and furthermore are there new
effective and safe categories of chemotherapeutic drugs currently available for chemotherapy resistant patients? The above
questions have been thoroughly discussed in the current issue.
Lombardo et al. [1] have presented a detailed systematic review of the available literature regarding the efficacy of the already
established but also of newer PDE5i on the management of post-pelvic surgery erectile dysfunction (ED). PDE5i have
revolutionized the field of ED management by providing a handful of appealing characteristics including high efficacy rates,
excellent safety profile, good adherence to treatment and ease of use. Thus, despite the low, according to the authors, efficacy
of the four different PDE5is (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil and avanafil) on post-pelvic surgery ED, these drugs still represent
the first-line treatment option (1). Nevertheless, the present systematic review concluded that although some patients may benefit
from the aforementioned PDE5is none of them can be clearly recommended as monotherapy for penile rehabilitation after
pelvic surgery. Moreover, the authors highlight that despite the encouraging preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the
efficacy of oro-dispersible (ODT) PDE5i formulations and new types of PDE5i, such as udenafil, lodenafil and mirodenafil,
the effect of these formulations in post-pelvic surgery erectile function has not been evaluated yet. Thus, there is a necessity for
future well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in order to clarify the role of these new compounds and ODT formulations
in the management algorithm of post-pelvic surgery ED.
Although to a much smaller degree compared to pelvic oncologic surgery, ED occurs even after surgical treatment of Benign
Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). In this scope, a narrative review by Mykoniatis et al. [2] assessed the prevalence, potential
pathophysiologic pathways and the proposed management of sexual dysfunction following ablative surgical techniques for
BPH. The techniques reviewed included photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA),
transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), convective water vapor energy ablation (REZUM®) and Aquablation®. Regarding
ED pathophysiologic mechanisms, it seems that PVP, TUNA, TUMT and REZUM, by being minimally invasive techniques,
avoid the direct cavernosal nerve damage intraoperatively due to posterolateral capsular perforation which may happen
during TURP procedure. However, the indirect thermal injury of cavernosal nerves and/or bladder neck nerves and also the
partial disruption of ejaculatory ducts represent potential ED and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) mechanisms after these surgical
techniques. On the contrary, Aquablation® by using physiological saline for tissue ablation and real-time penetration depth
control could potentially have a beneficial effect on postoperative erectile function. After reviewing the available data authors
reported that PVP, TUMT and TUNA have no impact or a mildly negative impact on erectile function and comparable or lower
rates of postoperative EjD, compared to TURP. Moreover, REZUM and Aquablation® techniques led to either no change or
even to amelioration of EF postoperatively (2). As potential preventive methods for the rare case of sexual dysfunction after
BPH surgery authors suggest the avoidance of intraoperative manipulation of crucial structures regarding ejaculatory (bladder
neck or ejaculatory ducts) and erectile (neurovascular bundles) functions. In cases of new or worsening ED or EjD postoperatively
then the already recommended treatment options are proposed. In other words, oral PDE5i as first line treatment, followed
by intracavernosal injection of alprostadil in cases of failure and penile prosthesis implantation as a permanent solution
for refractory to conservative treatment ED. Regarding EjD the proposed treatment options include medical therapy with aagonists
(pseudoephedrine), surgical reconstruction of the bladder neck, sperm retrieval from the urine, electroejaculation,
prostatic massage, penile vibratory stimulation and surgical sperm retrieval (2).
In another interesting review article available in the current CDT issue Emiliani et al. [3] performed a comprehensive review
of publications evaluating the efficacy of various phytotherapeutic and herbal agents for the prevention of kidney stones.
Despite the high number of commercially available phytotherapeutic agents for kidney stone, only a small number of relevant
clinical studies have been published with the majority of which including small number of participants and no active comparator
arm. According to the available data analyzed in this review Phyllanthus niruri and theobromine are currently the most
studied and most promising options for lithiasis prevention without having serious side effects (3). Specifically, Phyllanthus
niruri is accompanied by the most robust scientific evidence compared to other phytotherapies and is reported to interfere with
calcium oxalate crystallization and also reduce hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria. Moreover, it seems to play another benefi-cial role in lithiasis by positively affecting the success rates of shock wave lithotripsy through reduction of crystallization. Regarding
uric acid stones management studies evaluating the efficacy of theobromine have shown encouraging results as the use
of this supplement led to reduction of uric acid crystallization. Nevertheless, authors highlight the need for future RCTs in order
to furtherly evaluate the effect of these agents in the management of kidney stones (3). In an era where the majority of research
targets to stone treatment rather than stone prevention, the present review by reporting the potential key role of phytotherapies
in the latter may be of special interest both for endo-urologists and patients suffering from recurrent kidney stone
disease.
The last article published in the current issue by Calo et al. [4] is a systematic literature review evaluating the efficacy and
safety of the already established in the clinical practice but also of novel neoadjuvant therapeutic regimens for MIBC. Prospective
and retrospective studies published in the last 15 years were included. Platinum-based regimens remain the gold standard
of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with its main representatives being the combinations of methotrexate-vinblastineadriamycin-
cisplatin (MVAC), gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC), cisplatin-methotrexate-vinblastine (CMV) and cisplatinmethotrexate.
According to the available metanalytic data reported in the present review MVAC offers an improvement in the
absolute disease-free survival rate by 9% while CMV treatment results in a 16% reduction in mortality and also offers a 6%
improvement in the 10-year overall survival. Moreover, NAC regimens including gemcitabine showed comparable oncological
outcomes with MVAC. Interestingly, several studies showed no negative effect of NAC on perioperative morbidity and hospitalization
time (4). The new kids on the block for neoadjuvant treatment of MIBC, which are not cisplatin-eligible, are immunotherapeutic
agents targeting the PDL-1 pathways showing promising efficacy and safety results. The authors underline that
the establishment of biomarkers able to predict NAC response is a research field of high priority as it will enable clinicians to
select MIBC patients who will benefit the most while at the same time avoid delaying cystectomy for patients unlikely to respond.