Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Case Report

Transperineal Ultrasonographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Vaginal Adenosis

Author(s): Sebnem Karasu*, Atilla Hikmet Cilengir, Irfan Ocal and Serpil Aydogmus

Volume 18, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 08 June, 2021

Article ID: e080621193964 Pages: 4

DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210608153631

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Vaginal adenosis is a rare clinicopathological entity which refers to the presence of glandular endometrial tissue in the vaginal wall.

Case Report: A gravida 2 para 0 46-year-old woman presented to the gynecology department with symptoms of chronic pelvic pain. Maternal Diethylstilbestrol (DES) usage has been proven to be effective in the development of vaginal adenosis. It can also be idiopathic. Its sonographic or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings have not been described in English literature previously.

Conclusion: Here, we report the clinical, transperineal ultrasonographic (US) and MRI findings of a pathologically proven case of vaginal adenosis.

Keywords: Vaginal adenosis, transperineal ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, Diethylstilbestrol (DES), adenocarcinoma, dyspareunia.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Laronda MM, Unno K, Ishi K, et al. Diethylstilbestrol induces vaginal adenosis by disrupting SMAD/RUNX1-mediated cell fate decision in the Müllerian duct epithelium. Dev Biol 2013; 381(1): 5-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.06.024] [PMID: 23830984]
[2]
Laronda MM, Unno K, Butler LM, Kurita T. The development of cervical and vaginal adenosis as a result of diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero. Differentiation 2012; 84(3): 252-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2012.05.004] [PMID: 22682699]
[3]
Kranl C, Zelger B, Kofler H, Heim K, Sepp N, Fritsch P. Vulval and vaginal adenosis. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139(1): 128-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02329.x] [PMID: 9764164]
[4]
Cebesoy FB, Kutlar I, Aydin A. Vaginal adenosis successfully treated with simple unipolar cauterization. J Natl Med Assoc 2007; 99(2): 166-7.
[PMID: 17366953]
[5]
Bonafe JL, Thibaut I, Hoff J. Introital adenosis associated with the Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990; 15(5): 356-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1990.tb02112.x] [PMID: 2225538]
[6]
Sedlacek TV, Riva JM, Magen AB, Mangan CE, Cunnane MF. Vaginal and vulvar adenosis. An unsuspected side effect of CO2 laser vaporization. J Reprod Med 1990; 35(11): 995-1001.
[PMID: 2126044]
[7]
Goodman A, Zukerberg LR, Nikrui N, Scully RE. Vaginal adenosis and clear cell carcinoma after 5-fluorouracil treatment for condylomas. Cancer 1991; 68(7): 1628-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19911001)68:7<1628::AID-CNCR2820680727>3.0.CO;2-R] [PMID: 1893363]
[8]
Han T, Jin Y, Li Y, Bi Y, Pan L. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of primary vaginal adenosis as a dermatologic and gynecologic burden: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97(49): e13470.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013470] [PMID: 30544435]
[9]
Uehara T, Onda T, Sasajima Y, Sawada M, Kasamatsu T. A case of vaginal clear cell adenocarcinoma complicated with congenital anomalies of the genitourinary tract and metanephric remnant without prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36(3): 681-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01178.x] [PMID: 20598057]
[10]
Plouffe L, Hansen K, Hanly M. Vaginal adenosis following transverse vaginal septum resection as a cause of profuse vaginal discharge. Fertil Steril 1997; 68(Suppl. 1): 180-1.
[11]
Ferrero G, Fabbro E, Lacelli F, Perrone N, Sconfienza LM, Serafini G. Use of B-Mode Ultrasound (US), Three-dimensional US (3DUS), Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and Real-time Elastography (RTE) to Evaluate Anatomy and Pathological Conditions of the Vagina. European Congress of Radiology. 2013 March 7-11; Vienna, Austria.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/ecr.2013/c-1992]
[12]
Hamed ST, Mansour SM. Surface transperineal ultrasound and vaginal abnormalities: Applications and strengths. Br J Radiol 2017; 90(1080): 20170326.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170326] [PMID: 28937267]
[13]
Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Dillman JR, et al. Vaginal masses: Magnetic resonance imaging features with pathologic correlation. Acta Radiol 2007; 48(8): 921-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02841850701552926] [PMID: 17924224]
[14]
Hoover RN, Hyer M, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med 2011; 365(14): 1304-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1013961] [PMID: 21991952]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
18
5
1
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy