Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

The Use of Different Electrode Materials for Electricity Production in a Microbial Fuel Cell Using a Klebsiella oxytoca Microorganism Under Different Operating Conditions

Author(s): Israa K. Abdul-Wahid, Saleem M. Obyed and Basim O. Hasan*

Volume 14, Issue 3, 2021

Published on: 19 October, 2020

Page: [246 - 258] Pages: 13

DOI: 10.2174/2405520413999201019155324

Price: $65

Abstract

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have been developed impressively over recent years. In order to take this technology from research to application, the performance of these systems needs to be further investigated and optimized. The electrode materials and operating conditions play a vital role in MFCs performance. In the current work, dual chamber MFC was used to investigate the performance of different electrode materials under stationary and flow conditions. Microorganism solution of Klebsiella oxytoca and Citrobacter Freundii inoculum was used in the anode chamber. Three electrode materials were investigated, namely activated carbon, graphite, and titanium. High current density and power output were obtained by activated carbon electrode and graphite, while titanium showed poor performance for bio-electricity production. The low flow velocity (or Reynolds number) in catholyte was found to enhance the energy production, while the high velocity caused a reduction in the produced current. The aeration of the cathode chamber had a negative effect on the produced current due to the transfer of dissolved oxygen to the microorganism chamber. Activated carbon showed high performance due to its high surface area with the achieved maximum power density of 462.74 mW/m2 at Reynolds number of 7030.

Keywords: Microbial fuel cell, electrode material, anaerobic microorganism, flow velocity, aeration, Klebsiella oxytoca.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Huang H-J, Ramaswamy S, Tschirner UW, Ramarao BV. A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries. Separ Purif Tech 2008; 62(1): 1-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.011]
[2]
Boer GJ, Flato G, Ramsden D. A transient climate change simulation with greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing: Projected climate to the twenty-first century. Clim Dyn 2000; 16(6): 427-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003820050338]
[3]
Van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij A, Jürgens I, Best G, Fritsche U. Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification. Biomass Bioenergy 2008; 32(8): 749-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.018]
[4]
Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Weimer PJ, Vogel KP. Plant species composition and biofuel yields of conservation grasslands. Ecol Appl 2009; 19(8): 2202-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-2094.1] [PMID: 20014588]
[5]
Logan BE, Call D, Cheng S, et al. Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 2008; 42(23): 8630-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801553z] [PMID: 19192774]
[6]
Patil SA, Harnisch F, Kapadnis B, Schröder U. Electroactive mixed culture biofilms in microbial bioelectrochemical systems: The role of temperature for biofilm formation and performance. Biosens Bioelectron 2010; 26(2): 803-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.06.019] [PMID: 20630740]
[7]
Reguera G, Nevin KP, Nicoll JS, Covalla SF, Woodard TL, Lovley DR. Biofilm and nanowire production leads to increased current in Geobacter sulfurreducens fuel cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72(11): 7345-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01444-06] [PMID: 16936064]
[8]
kumar GG, Sarathi VG, Nahm KS. Recent advances and challenges in the anode architecture and their modifications for the applications of microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 2013; 43: 461-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.12.048] [PMID: 23452909]
[9]
Churikov AV, Alexander V. Ivanishchev, Irina M. Gamayunova, and Arseni V. Ushakov. Density calculations for (Na, K)BH4 + (Na, K)BO2 + (Na, K)OH + H2O solutions used in hydrogen power engineering. J Chem Eng Data 2011; 56: 3984-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je200216n]
[10]
ter Heijne A, Hamelers HVM, Saakes M, Buisman CJN. Performance of non-porous graphite and titanium-based anodes in microbial fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 2008; 53(18): 5697-703.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.032]
[11]
Michaelidou U, ter Heijne A, Euverink GJW, Hamelers HVM, Stams AJM, Geelhoed JS. Microbial communities and electrochemical performance of titanium-based anodic electrodes in a microbial fuel cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77(3): 1069-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02912-09] [PMID: 21131513]
[12]
Ivanishcheva IA, Ivanishchev AV. Positive effect of surface modification with titanium carbosilicide on performance of lithium-transition metal phosphate cathode materials. Monatsh Chem 2019; 150(3): 489-98.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00706-018-2314-8]
[13]
Cha J, Choi S, Yu H, Kim H, Kim C. Directly applicable microbial fuel cells in aeration tank for wastewater treatment. Bioelectrochemistry 2010; 78(1): 72-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.07.009] [PMID: 19674944]
[14]
Sathiyapriya R. A review on selection of electrodes and its effects on microbial fuel cells for the electricity generation
[15]
Karmakar S, Kundu K, Kundu S. Design and development of microbial fuel cells. Current Research Technology and Development Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology. Microbiology Book Series, Spain. Formatex 2010; 2: 1029-34.
[16]
Tao Q, Luo J, Zhou J, Zhou S, Liu G, Zhang R. Effect of dissolved oxygen on nitrogen and phosphorus removal and electricity production in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 2014; 164: 402-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.002] [PMID: 24880930]
[17]
Oliveira VB, Simões M, Melo LF, Pinto A. Overview on the developments of microbial fuel cells. Biochem Eng J 2013; 73: 53-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.01.012]
[18]
Rochex A, Godon J-J, Bernet N, Escudié R. Role of shear stress on composition, diversity and dynamics of biofilm bacterial communities. Water Res 2008; 42(20): 4915-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.015] [PMID: 18945468]
[19]
Pham HT, Boon N, Aelterman P, et al. High shear enrichment improves the performance of the anodophilic microbial consortium in a microbial fuel cell. Microb Biotechnol 2008; 1(6): 487-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00049.x] [PMID: 21261869]
[20]
Hamed M S. Experimental study for enhancing electricity production using two compartments microbial fuel cell Nahrain university 2019.
[21]
Slaiman QJM, Hasan BO, Mahmood HA. Corrosion inhibition of carbon steel under two-phase flow (water-petroleum) simulated by turbulently agitated system. Cancer J Chem Eng 2008; 86(2): 240-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20027]
[22]
Feng Y, Wang X, Logan BE, Lee H. Brewery wastewater treatment using air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008; 78(5): 873-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1360-2] [PMID: 18246346]
[23]
Gadkari S, Fontmorin JM, Yu E, Sadhukhan J. Influence of temperature and other system parameters on microbial fuel cell performance: Numerical and experimental investigation. Chem Eng J 2020; 388: 124176.
[24]
Bennetto HP, Stirling JL, Tanaka K, Vega CA. Anodic reactions in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 1983; 25(2): 559-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260250219] [PMID: 18548670]
[25]
Hasan BO, Aziz SM. Corrosion of carbon steel in two phase flow (CO2 gas-CaCO3 solution) controlled by sacrificial anode. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2017; 46: 71-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.06.032]
[26]
Oh S, Min B, Logan BE. Cathode performance as a factor in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 2004; 38(18): 4900-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es049422p] [PMID: 15487802]
[27]
Min B, Cheng S, Logan BE. Electricity generation using membrane and salt bridge microbial fuel cells. Water Res 2005; 39(9): 1675-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.002] [PMID: 15899266]
[28]
Hasan BO, Sadek SA. The effect of temperature and hydrodynamics on carbon steel corrosion and its inhibition in oxygenated acid–salt solution. J Ind Eng Chem 2014; 20(1): 297-307.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.03.034]
[29]
Chen S, Patil SA, Schröder U. A high-performance rotating graphite fiber brush air-cathode for microbial fuel cells. Appl Energy 2018; 211: 1089-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.013]
[30]
Fung AWP, Rao AM, Kuriyama K, et al. Raman scattering and electrical conductivity in highly disordered activated carbon fibers. J Mater Res 1993; 8(3): 489-500.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1993.0489]
[31]
Larrosa-Guerrero A, Scott K, Katuri KP, Godinez C, Head IM, Curtis T. Open circuit versus closed circuit enrichment of anodic biofilms in MFC: Effect on performance and anodic communities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 87(5): 1699-713.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2624-1] [PMID: 20473665]
[32]
Santoro C, et al. The effects of carbon electrode surface properties on bacteria attachment and start up time of microbial fuel cells. Carbon N Y 2014; 67: 128-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.071]
[33]
Chaudhuri SK, Lovley DR. Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21(10): 1229-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt867] [PMID: 12960964]
[34]
Baudler A, Schmidt I, Langner M, Greiner A, Schröder U. Does it have to be carbon? Metal anodes in microbial fuel cells and related bioelectrochemical systems. Energy Environ Sci 2015; 8(7): 2048-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5EE00866B]
[35]
Young HD, Freedman RA, Sandin TR, Ford AL. University physics. MA: Addison-Wesley Reading 1996; Vol. 9.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
20
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy