Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Relative Estimate of Revised Cardiovascular Risk Combining Traditional and Non-traditional Image-based CV Markers: A Kerala Based Study

Author(s): Paulin Paul *, Noel George and B. Priestly Shan

Volume 16, Issue 9, 2020

Page: [1131 - 1153] Pages: 23

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200218125539

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Non-traditional image markers can improve the traditional cardiovascular risk estimation, is untested in Kerala based participants.

Objective: To identify the relationship between the ‘Modified CV risk’ categories with traditional and non-traditional image-based risk markers. The correlation and improvement in reclassification, achieved by pooling atherosclerotic non-traditional markers with Intermediate (≥7.5% and <20%) and High (≥20%) 10-year participants is evaluated.

Methods: The cross-sectional study with 594 participants has the ultrasound measurements recorded from the medical archives of clinical locations at Ernakulum district, Kerala. With carotid Intima-Media Thickness (cIMT) measurement, the Plaque (cP) complexity was computed using selected plaque characteristics to compute the carotid Total Plaque Risk Score (cTPRS) for superior risk tagging. Statistical analysis was done using RStudio, the classification accuracy was verified using the decision tree algorithm.

Results: The mean age of the participants was (58.14±10.05) years. The mean cIMT was (0.956±0.302) mm, with 65.6% plaque incidence. With 94.90% variability around its mean, the Multinomial Logistic Regression model identifies cIMT and cTPRS, age, diabetics, Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH), Hypertension treatment, the presence of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) as significant (p<0.05). cIMT and cP were found significant for ‘Intermediate High’, ‘High’ and ‘Very High’ ‘Modified CV risk’ categories. However, age, diabetes, gender and use of hypertension treatment are significant for the ‘Intermediate’ ‘Modified CV risk’ category. The overall performance of the MLR model was 80.5%. The classification accuracy verified using the decision tree algorithm has 78.7% accuracy.

Conclusion: The use of atherosclerotic markers shows a significant correlation suitable for a nextlevel reclassification of the traditional CV risk.

Keywords: Cardiovascular risk, non-traditional risk factor (TRF), carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, 10-year CVD risk, CV markers.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97(18): 1837-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837] [PMID: 9603539]
[2]
U.S. Preventive Services Ttask Force. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Risk Assessment for Cardiovascular Disease with Nontraditional Risk Factors : Recommendation Statement. Vol. 99. Am Fam Physician. 2019.
[3]
Gonçalves I, den Ruijter H, Nahrendorf M, Pasterkamp G. Detecting the vulnerable plaque in patients. J Intern Med 2015; 278(5): 520-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.12414] [PMID: 26306911]
[4]
Ho SS. Current status of carotid ultrasound in atherosclerosis. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2016; 6(3): 285-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims.2016.05.03] [PMID: 27429912]
[5]
Den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Anderson TJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 308(8): 796-803.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.9630] [PMID: 22910757]
[6]
Kasliwal RR, Bansal M, Desai D, Sharma M. Carotid intima-media thickness: Current evidence, practices, and Indian experience. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 18(1): 13-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.126522] [PMID: 24701425]
[7]
JBS3 Board. Joint British Societies’ consensus recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (JBS3). Vol. 100, Heart J 2014. Available from:. http://heart.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305693
[8]
Bansal M, Kasliwal RR, Trehan N. Relationship between different cardiovascular risk scores and measures of subclinical atherosclerosis in an Indian population. Indian Heart J 2015; 67(4): 332-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2015.04.017] [PMID: 26304565]
[9]
Naghavi M, Falk E, Hecht HS, et al. SHAPE Task Force. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient--Part III: Executive summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) task force report. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98(2A): 2H-15H.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.002] [PMID: 16843744]
[10]
Sillesen H, Muntendam P, Adourian A, et al. Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: Comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the High Risk Plaque BioImage study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5(7): 681-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.013] [PMID: 22789936]
[11]
Kasliwal RR, Bansal M, Desai N, et al. SCORE-India collaborators. A Study to derive distribution of carotid intima media thickness and to determine its COrrelation with cardiovascular Risk factors in asymptomatic nationwidE Indian population (SCORE-India). Indian Heart J 2016; 68(6): 821-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.04.009] [PMID: 27931554]
[12]
Whincup PH, Nightingale CM, Owen CG, et al. Ethnic differences in carotid intima-media thickness between UK children of black African-Caribbean and white European origin. Stroke 2012; 43(7): 1747-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644955] [PMID: 22569936]
[13]
Shanker J, Govind S, Bhaskar D, et al. Association of carotid intima media thickness and periscope markers with coronary artery disease, risk factors and biomarkers in Asian Indians. Int J Cardiovasc Res 2013; 2(2): 1-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2324-8602.1000118]
[14]
Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, Lonn E, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force; Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: A consensus statement from the American Society of echocardiography carotid intima-media thickness task force. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21(2): 93-111.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011] [PMID: 18261694]
[15]
Kaul S, Alladi S, Mridula RK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of carotid intima-media thickness in asymptomatic individual subjects in a tertiary care center in India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015; 18(4): 430-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.165481] [PMID: 26713016]
[16]
ten Kate GL, ten Kate G-JR, van den Oord SCH, et al. Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical coronary artery disease in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111(9): 1305-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.274] [PMID: 23411100]
[17]
Liu B, Ni J, Shi M, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and its association with conventional risk factors in low-income adults: A population-based cross-sectional study in China. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 41500.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41500] [PMID: 28134279]
[18]
Rana V, Johari A, Sidhar M. Carotid artery intima media thickness in predicting coronary artery disease in type II Diabetes Mellitus. J Adv Res Med 2018; 5(3): 1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.24321/2349.7181.201812]
[19]
Wani AS. Zafirah, Rashid S, Tantray HM. Carotid intima-media thickness as a marker for assessing the severity of coronary artery disease on coronary angiography. Int J Res Med Sci 2018; 6(4): 1283-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20181283]
[20]
Park TH. Evaluation of Carotid Plaque Using Ultrasound Imaging. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016; 24(2): 91-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.2.91] [PMID: 27358696]
[21]
Nambi V, Chambless L, He M, et al. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness is as good as carotid intima-media thickness of all carotid artery segments in improving prediction of coronary heart disease risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(2): 183-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr192] [PMID: 21666250]
[22]
Gepner AD, Young R, Delaney JA, et al. Comparison of coronary artery calcium presence, carotid plaque presence, and carotid intima-media thickness for cardiovascular disease prediction in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 8(1): e002262-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002262] [PMID: 25596139]
[23]
Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, et al. The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol 1991; 1(3): 263-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-W] [PMID: 1669507]
[24]
Iglesias del Sol A, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, Witteman JCM. Carotid intima-media thickness at different sites: Relation to incident myocardial infarction; The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 2002; 23(12): 934-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2001.2965] [PMID: 12069447]
[25]
Naqvi M-SL. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. J Am Coll Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7(10): 1025-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.014]
[26]
Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P, et al. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 1999; 30(4): 841-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.4.841] [PMID: 10187889]
[27]
Hirata T, Arai Y, Takayama M, Abe Y, Ohkuma K, Takebayashi T. Carotid plaque score and risk of cardiovascular mortality in the oldest old: Results from the TOOTH study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2018; 25(1): 55-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.37911] [PMID: 28179606]
[28]
Störk S, van den Beld AW, von Schacky C, et al. Carotid artery plaque burden, stiffness, and mortality risk in elderly men: A prospective, population-based cohort study. Circulation 2004; 110(3): 344-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000134966.10793.C9] [PMID: 15238459]
[29]
Ihle-Hansen H, Vigen T, Ihle-Hansen H, et al. Prevalence of carotid plaque in a 63- to 65-year-old norwegian cohort from the general population: The ACE (Akershus Cardiac Examination) 1950 study. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7(10): 1-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008562] [PMID: 29739796]
[30]
Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline Practice Guidelines 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults : Executive summary a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force. Am Heart J 2010; 122: 2748-64.
[PMID: 21098427]
[31]
Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2012; 33(13): 1635-701.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092] [PMID: 22555213]
[32]
Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society. Eur Heart J 2013; 34(10): 1953-2041..
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht151. Epub 2013 Jun 14] [PMID: 23771844]
[33]
Piepoli MF. Authors/Task Force Members; Additional Contributor: Simone Binno (Italy); Document Reviewers. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23(11): NP1-NP96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487316653709] [PMID: 27353126]
[34]
Tosetto A, Prati P, Baracchini C, Manara R, Rodeghiero F. Age-adjusted reference limits for carotid intima-media thickness as better indicator of vascular risk: population-based estimates from the VITA project. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3(6): 1224-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01440.x] [PMID: 15946212]
[35]
Lorenz MW, von Kegler S, Steinmetz H, Markus HS, Sitzer M. Carotid intima-media thickening indicates a higher vascular risk across a wide age range: Prospective data from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Stroke 2006; 37(1): 87-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000196964.24024.ea] [PMID: 16339465]
[36]
Touboul P-J, Labreuche J, Vicaut E, et al. PARC Study Investigators. Country-based reference values and impact of cardiovascular risk factors on carotid intima-media thickness in a French population: the ‘Paroi Artérielle et Risque Cardio-Vasculaire’ (PARC) Study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27(4): 361-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000202013] [PMID: 19218802]
[37]
Simova L. Intima-media thickness: Appropriate evaluation and proper measurement, described. An article from the e-journal of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice. E-journal of ESC Council for Cardiology Practice 2015; 13..
[38]
Spence JD, Eliasziw M, DiCicco M, Hackam DG, Galil R, Lohmann T. Carotid plaque area: A tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke 2002; 33(12): 2916-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000042207.16156.B9] [PMID: 12468791]
[39]
Touboul P-J, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34(4): 290-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000343145] [PMID: 23128470]
[40]
Ogata T, Yasaka M, Yamagishi M, Seguchi O, Nagatsuka K, Minematsu K. Atherosclerosis found on carotid ultrasonography is associated with atherosclerosis on coronary intravascular ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24(4): 469-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.4.469]
[41]
Morito N, Inoue Y, Urata M, et al. Increased carotid artery plaque score is an independent predictor of the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. J Cardiol 2008; 51(1): 25-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2007.09.003] [PMID: 18522772]
[42]
Vishwakarma P, Narain V, Saran R, Dwivedi S, Sethi R, Chandra S. Correlation between carotid ultrasonography findings and SYNTAX score in South Asian patients with coronary artery disease: A single-center study. Heart India 2018; 6: 6-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/heartindia.heartindia_11_18]
[43]
Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa K, Nagai Y, et al. Equivalence of plaque score and intima-media thickness of carotid ultrasonography for predicting severe coronary artery lesion. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29(3): 367-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00743-3] [PMID: 12706187]
[44]
Zhang H, Liu M, Ren T, et al. Associations between carotid artery plaque score, carotid hemodynamics and coronary heart disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12(11): 14275-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121114275] [PMID: 26569275]
[45]
Johri AM, Chitty DW, Matangi M, et al. Can carotid bulb plaque assessment rule out significant coronary artery disease? A comparison of plaque quantification by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26(1): 86-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2012.09.005] [PMID: 23084880]
[46]
Prati P, Tosetto A, Casaroli M, et al. Carotid plaque morphology improves stroke risk prediction: usefulness of a new ultrasonographic score. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 31(3): 300-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000320852] [PMID: 21212660]
[47]
Mathiesen EB, Bønaa KH, Joakimsen O. Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: The tromsø study. Circulation 2001; 103(17): 2171-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.17.2171] [PMID: 11331258]
[48]
Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine Committe Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. Standard method for ultrasound evaluation of carotid artery lesions. J Med Ultrason 2009; 36: 501-18.
[49]
Johnsen SH, Mathiesen EB. Carotid plaque compared with intima-media thickness as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2009; 11(1): 21-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-009-0004-1] [PMID: 19091171]
[50]
Nicolaides A, Beach KW, Kyriacou E, Pattichis CS. (Eds.) Ultrasound and Carotid Bifurcation Atherosclerosis. Springer 2015; 1: pp. 1-641..
[51]
Paul P, George N, Shan BP. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction using JBS3 Tool: A Kerala based StudyCurr Med Imaging
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666200103144559]
[52]
Raju KP, Kumar MJ, Sujatha CH, Prakash PR. Prediction of heart disease using decision tree a data mining technique. Int J Comput Sci Network 2016; 5(6): 885-92.
[53]
Anitha S, Sridevi N. Heart disease prediction using data mining techniques. ICTACT J Soft Comput 2018; 9(1): 1817-23.
[54]
Lakshmishree J, Paramesha K. Prediction of heart disease based on decision trees. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol (IJRASET) 2017; 5(5): 943-8.
[55]
Thankappan KR, Shah B, Mathur P, et al. Risk factor profile for chronic non-communicable diseases: Results of a community-based study in Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res 2010; 131(1): 53-63.
[PMID: 20167974]
[56]
Krishnan MN, Zachariah G, Venugopal K, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery disease and its risk factors in Kerala, South India: A community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016; 16: 12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0189-3] [PMID: 26769341]
[57]
Harikrishnan S, Sarma S, Sanjay G, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its risk factors in Kerala, South India: Analysis of a community based cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2018; 13(3)e0192372
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192372] [PMID: 29584725]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
25
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy