Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Rheumatology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3971
ISSN (Online): 1875-6360

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Review Article

Evaluation of Cartilage in the Wrist using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Author(s): Wesley N. Sivak and Joseph E. Imbriglia*

Volume 16, Issue 3, 2020

Page: [170 - 177] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1573397115666190819153912

Price: $65

Abstract

Wrist pain is a common patient complaint with a myriad of clinical conditions that can explain the underlying cause. Short of wrist arthroscopy, no technique other than formal wrist arthrotomy exists for direct examination of the hyaline cartilage coating the articular surfaces of the carpal bones. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proven accurate in evaluating joint surfaces of large joints such as the shoulder, hip, and knee with articular cartilage surface thickness is in excess of 1 mm. However, in the carpus the thickness of the cartilage and the contours present have precluded accurate imaging. Advances in MRI technology over the last several decades are now making imaging of small joint surfaces, such as the carpus, an area worth revisiting. Herein we provide a review of these efforts with a specific focus on the evaluation of the wrist.

Keywords: Wrist, cartilage, magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, arthritis, articular surface.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Koo S, Gold GE, Andriacchi TP. Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13(9): 782-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.013] [PMID: 15961328]
[2]
Recht M, Bobic V, Burstein D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (391): (Suppl.)S379-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200110001-00035] [PMID: 11603721]
[3]
Recht MP, Resnick D. MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163(2): 283-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037016] [PMID: 8037016]
[4]
Yeh LR, Kwak S, Kim YS, et al. Evaluation of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head and the glenoid fossa by MR arthrography: anatomic correlation in cadavers. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27(9): 500-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002560050427] [PMID: 9809879]
[5]
Huang M, Schweitzer ME. The role of radiology in the evolution of the understanding of articular disease. Radiology 2014; 273(2)(Suppl.): S1-S22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140270] [PMID: 25340431]
[6]
Chappell I, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time in wrist cartilage with scapholunate ligament injury. International Journal of Diagnostic Imaging 2015; 2(2): p96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijdi.v2n2p96]
[7]
Haims AH, Moore AE, Schweitzer ME, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of cartilage injury in the wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182(5): 1267-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821267] [PMID: 15100130]
[8]
Brittberg M, Peterson L. Introduction of an articular cartilage classification. ICRS Newsletter 1998; 1(1): 5-8.
[9]
Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(Suppl. 2): 58-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200300002-00008] [PMID: 12721346]
[10]
Bobic V. ICRS articular cartilage imaging committee. CRS MR imaging protocol for knee articular cartilage 2000.
[11]
Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167(1): 127-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659356] [PMID: 8659356]
[12]
Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, et al. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163(3): 629-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.163.3.8079858] [PMID: 8079858]
[13]
Kawahara Y, Uetani M, Nakahara N, et al. Fast spin-echo MR of the articular cartilage in the osteoarthrotic knee. Correlation of MR and arthroscopic findings. Acta Radiol 1998; 39(2): 120-5.
[PMID: 9529440]
[14]
Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, et al. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172(4): 1073-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587150] [PMID: 10587150]
[15]
Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Haas SB. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80(9): 1276-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199809000-00005] [PMID: 9759811]
[16]
Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 1996; 198(1): 209-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.1.8539380] [PMID: 8539380]
[17]
Hardy PA, Nammalwar P, Kuo S. Measuring the thickness of articular cartilage from MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13(1): 120-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200101)13:1<120:AID-JMRI1018>3.0.CO;2-7] [PMID: 11169813]
[18]
Recht MP, Kramer J, Marcelis S, et al. Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology 1993; 187(2): 473-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475293] [PMID: 8475293]
[19]
Mutimer J, Green J, Field J. Comparison of MRI and wrist arthroscopy for assessment of wrist cartilage. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33(3): 380-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753193408090395] [PMID: 18562375]
[20]
Pedersen JK, Lorenzen T, Ejbjerg B, et al. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging or combined ultrasonography and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody improve correct classification of individuals as established rheumatoid arthritis: results of a population-based, cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15(1): 268.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-268] [PMID: 25103610]
[21]
Suzuki T, Horikoshi M, Sugihara M, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor-necrosis-factor inhibitors: 1 year follow-up with low-field extremity MRI. Mod Rheumatol 2013; 23(4): 782-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/s10165-012-0746-2] [PMID: 22975733]
[22]
Nikken JJ, Oei EH, Ginai AZ, et al. Acute peripheral joint injury: cost and effectiveness of low-field-strength MR imaging--results of randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2005; 236(3): 958-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2362041130] [PMID: 16118171]
[23]
Chang G, Friedrich KM, Wang L, et al. MRI of the wrist at 7 tesla using an eight-channel array coil combined with parallel imaging: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31(3): 740-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22072] [PMID: 20187221]
[24]
Craig JG, Go L, Blechinger J, et al. Three-tesla imaging of the knee: initial experience. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34(8): 453-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0919-6] [PMID: 15968554]
[25]
Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(2): 343-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.2.1830343] [PMID: 15269023]
[26]
Uematsu H, Takahashi M, Dougherty L, Hatabu H. High field body MR imaging: preliminary experiences. Clin Imaging 2004; 28(3): 159-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00151-7] [PMID: 15158217]
[27]
Johnson D, Stevens KJ, Riley G, Shapiro L, Yoshioka H, Gold GE. Approach to MR Imaging of the Elbow and Wrist: Technical Aspects and Innovation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015; 23(3): 355-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2015.04.008] [PMID: 26216768]
[28]
Shapiro EM, Borthakur A, Gougoutas A, Reddy R. 23Na MRI accurately measures fixed charge density in articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47(2): 284-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10054] [PMID: 11810671]
[29]
Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Hughes T, et al. In vivo biochemical 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance: preliminary results of dGEMRIC, zonal T2, and T2* mapping of articular cartilage. Invest Radiol 2008; 43(9): 619-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9122] [PMID: 18708855]
[30]
Peterfy CG, DiCarlo JC, Olech E, Bagnard MA, Gabriele A, Gaylis N. Evaluating joint-space narrowing and cartilage loss in rheumatoid arthritis by using MRI. Arthritis Res Ther 2012; 14(3): R131.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3861] [PMID: 22647501]
[31]
Avenarius DF, Müller L-SO, Rosendahl K. Erosion or normal variant? 4-year MRI follow-up of the wrists in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 1-9.
[PMID: 26637316]
[32]
Sankowski AJ, Lebkowska UM, Cwikła J, Walecka I, Walecki J. The comparison of efficacy of different imaging techniques (conventional radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance) in assessment of wrist joints and metacarpophalangeal joints in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Pol J Radiol 2013; 78(1): 18-29.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.883764] [PMID: 23494635]
[33]
Schwenzer NF, Kötter I, Henes JC, et al. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(3): 715-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2671] [PMID: 20173150]
[34]
Menashe L, Hirko K, Losina E, et al. The diagnostic performance of MRI in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20(1): 13-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.10.003] [PMID: 22044841]
[35]
Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, Ejbjerg BJ, et al. Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52(12): 3860-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21493] [PMID: 16320333]
[36]
Haavardsholm EA, Østergaard M, Hammer HB, et al. Monitoring anti-TNFalpha treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: responsiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the dominant wrist joint compared with conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68(10): 1572-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.091801] [PMID: 19019893]
[37]
Østergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, et al. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol 2003; 30(6): 1385-6.
[PMID: 12784422]
[38]
Boesen M, et al. Correlation between computer-aided dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI assessment of inflammation and semi-quantitative synovitis and bone marrow oedema scores of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—a cohort study. Rheumatology 2011.ker220
[PMID: 22075065]
[39]
Peterfy CG, Olech E, DiCarlo JC, Merrill JT, Countryman PJ, Gaylis NB. Monitoring cartilage loss in the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis with magnetic resonance imaging in a multi-center clinical trial: IMPRESS (NCT00425932). Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15(2): R44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4202] [PMID: 23514433]
[40]
Peterfy CG. SP0201 Cartilage assessment by MRI in large and small joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72(Suppl. 3): A46-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.201]
[41]
Yang H, Rivoire J, Hoppe M, et al. Computer-aided and manual quantifications of MRI synovitis, bone marrow edema-like lesions, erosion and cartilage loss in rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44(4): 539-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2059-3] [PMID: 25488101]
[42]
Pillai RR, Thoomukuntla B, Ateshian GA, Fischer KJ. MRI-based modeling for evaluation of in vivo contact mechanics in the human wrist during active light grasp. J Biomech 2007; 40(12): 2781-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.019] [PMID: 17391678]
[43]
Johnson JE, McIff TE, Lee P, Toby EB, Fischer KJ. Validation of radiocarpal joint contact models based on images from a clinical MRI scanner. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014; 17(4): 378-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.684446] [PMID: 22631873]
[44]
Zink J-V, Souteyrand P, Guis S, et al. Standardized quantitative measurements of wrist cartilage in healthy humans using 3T magnetic resonance imaging. World J Orthop 2015; 6(8): 641-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.641] [PMID: 26396941]
[45]
Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Lu Y, et al. Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165(2): 371-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618560] [PMID: 7618560]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
35
3
World Hemophilia Day
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy