[1]
White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984; 310(13): 819-24.
[2]
Vijayan S, Barmby DS, Pearson IR, Davies AG, Wheatcroft SB, Sivananthan M. Assessing coronary blood flow physiology in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Curr Cardiol Rev 2017; 13(3): 232-43.
[3]
van de Hoef TP, Siebes M, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure. Eur Heart J 2015; 36(47): 3312-9a.
[4]
Waller AH, Blankstein R, Kwong RY, Di Carli MF. Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. Curr Cardiol Rep 2014; 16(5): 483.
[5]
van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, Rolandi MC, et al. Coronary pressure-flow relations as basis for the understanding of coronary physiology. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2012; 52(4): 786-93.
[6]
Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97(8): 765-72.
[7]
Knoebel SB, McHenry PL, Phillips JF, Pauletto FJ. Coronary collateral circulation and myocardial blood flow reserve. Circulation 1972; 46(1): 84-94.
[8]
Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol 1974; 34(1): 48-55.
[9]
Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med 2017; 376(19): 1813-23.
[10]
Kobayashi Y, Johnson NP, Zimmermann FM, et al. Agreement of the resting distal to aortic coronary pressure with the instantaneous wave-free ratio. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70(17): 2105-13.
[11]
Lee JM, Park J, Hwang D, et al. Similarity and difference of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure and instantaneous wave-free ratio. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70(17): 2114-23.
[12]
Shiode N, Okimoto T, Tamekiyo H, et al. A comparison between the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting distal coronary artery pressure/aortic pressure and the fractional flow reserve: The diagnostic accuracy can be improved by the use of both indices. Intern Med 2017; 56(7): 749-53.
[13]
Maini R, Moscona J, Sidhu G, et al. Pooled diagnostic accuracy of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure referenced to fractional flow reserve: The importance of resting coronary physiology. J Interv Cardiol 2018; 31(5): 588-98.
[14]
Svanerud J, Ahn JM, Jeremias A, et al. Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: The Resting Full-cycle Ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. EuroIntervention 2018; 14(7): 806-14.
[15]
Tian X, Sun A, Liu X, et al. Influence of catheter insertion on the hemodynamic environment in coronary arteries. Med Eng Phys 2016; 38(9): 946-51.
[16]
Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y, et al. Virtual resting Pd/Pa from coronary angiography and blood flow modelling: Diagnostic performance against fractional flow reserve. Heart Lung Circ 2018; 27(3): 377-80.
Related Books
Blood Oxidant Ties: The Evolving Concepts in Myocardial Injury and Cardiovascular Disease
Advancements in Cardiovascular Research and Therapeutics: Molecular and Nutraceutical Perspectives
Herbal Medicine: Back to the Future
Cardiac Care and COVID-19: Perspectives in Medical Practice
Nanomedicinal Approaches Towards Cardiovascular Disease
Herbal Medicine: Back to the Future
Article Metrics
20
5
1
1