Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Novel Automated Method for the Detection of White Matter Hyperintensities in Brain Multispectral MR Images

Author(s): Hsian-Min Chen, Clayton Chi-Chang Chen, Hsin Che Wang, Yung-Chieh Chang, Kuan-Jung Pan, Wen-Hsien Chen, Hung-Chieh Chen, Yi-Ying Wu, Jyh-Wen Chai*, Yen-Chieh Ouyang and San-Kan Lee

Volume 16, Issue 5, 2020

Page: [469 - 478] Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/1573405614666180801112844

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: According to the Standards for Reporting Vascular Changes on Neuroimaging, White Matter Hyperintensities (WMHs) are cerebral white matter lesions that are characterized by abnormal tissues of variable sizes and appear hyperintense in T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance (MR) measurements without cavitation (i.e., their tissue signals differ from those of Cerebrospinal Fluid or CSF). Such abnormal tissue regions are typically observed in the MR images of brains of healthy older adults and are associated with a number of geriatric neurodegenerative diseases. Explanations of the exact causes and mechanisms of these diseases remain inconclusive. Moreover, WMHs are typically identified by visual assessment and manual examination, both of which require considerable time. This brings up a need of developing a method for detecting WMHs more objectively and enabling patients to be treated early. As a consequence, damages on nerve cells can be limited and the severity of patients’ conditions can be contained.

Aims: This paper presents a computer-aided technique for automatically detecting and segmenting anomalies in MR images.

Methods: The method has two steps: (1) a Band Expansion Process (BEP) to expand the dimensions of brain MR images nonlinearly and (2) anomaly detection algorithms to detect WMHs. Synthesized MR images provided by BrainWeb were used as benchmarks against which the detection performance of the algorithms was determined.

Results: The most notable findings are as follows: Firstly, compared with the other anomaly detection algorithms and the Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST), BEP-anomaly detection is shown to be the most effective in detecting WMHs. Secondly, across all levels of background noise and inhomogeneity, the mean Similarity Index (SI) produced by our proposed algorithm is higher than that produced by LST, indicating that the algorithm is more effective than LST in segmenting WMHs from brain MR images.

Conclusion: Experimental results demonstrated a significantly high accuracy of the BEP-K/R-RX method in detection of synthetic brain MS lesion data. In the meantime, it also effectively enhances the detection of brain lesions.

Keywords: White matter hyperintensities, multispectral MR images, Band Expansion Process (BEP), anomaly detection, RX detector, multiple sclerosis.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12(8): 822-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8]
[2]
Kim KW, MacFall JR, Payne ME. Classification of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in elderly persons. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 64(4): 273-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.024]
[3]
Debette S, Markus HS. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 341: c3666.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3666]
[4]
de Groot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM. Cerebral white matter lesions and depressive symptoms in elderly adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57(11): 1071-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.11.1071] [PMID: 11074873]
[5]
de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Achten E, et al. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 70(1): 9-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.1.9] [PMID: 11118240]
[6]
Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, et al. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology 1993; 43(9): 1683-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.43.9.1683] [PMID: 8414012]
[7]
Marshall GA, Shchelchkov E, Kaufer DI, Ivanco LS, Bohnen NI. White matter hyperintensities and cortical acetylcholinesterase activity in parkinsonian dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 2006; 113(2): 87-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00553.x] [PMID: 16411968]
[8]
DeCarli C, Miller BL, Swan GE, Reed T, Wolf PA, Carmelli D. Cerebrovascular and brain morphologic correlates of mild cognitive impairment in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Twin Study. Arch Neurol 2001; 58(4): 643-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.4.643] [PMID: 11295996]
[9]
Hirono N, Kitagaki H, Kazui H, Hashimoto M, Mori E. Impact of white matter changes on clinical manifestation of Alzheimer’s disease: A quantitative study. Stroke 2000; 31(9): 2182-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.9.2182] [PMID: 10978049]
[10]
Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N. The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: a quantitative review. Neuropsychology 2000; 14(2): 224-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.14.2.224] [PMID: 10791862]
[11]
Mäntylä R, Erkinjuntti T, Salonen O, et al. Variable agreement between visual rating scales for white matter hyperintensities on MRI. Comparison of 13 rating scales in a poststroke cohort. Stroke 1997; 28(8): 1614-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.8.1614] [PMID: 9259759]
[12]
Prins ND, van Straaten EC, van Dijk EJ, et al. Measuring progression of cerebral white matter lesions on MRI: visual rating and volumetrics. Neurology 2004; 62(9): 1533-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000123264.40498.B6] [PMID: 15136677]
[13]
Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, et al. Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage 2002; 17(1): 479-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1040] [PMID: 12482100]
[14]
Gibson E, Gao F, Black SE, Lobaugh NJ. Automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in the elderly using FLAIR images at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31(6): 1311-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22004] [PMID: 20512882]
[15]
Cerasa A, Bilotta E, Augimeri A, et al. A Cellular Neural Network methodology for the automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neurosci Methods 2012; 203(1): 193-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.047] [PMID: 21920384]
[16]
Simões R, Mönninghoff C, Dlugaj M, et al. Automatic segmentation of cerebral white matter hyperintensities using only 3D FLAIR images. Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 31(7): 1182-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.12.004] [PMID: 23684961]
[17]
Magome T, Arimura H, Kakeda S, et al. Automated segmentation method of white matter and gray matter regions with multiple sclerosis lesions in MR images. Radiological Phys Technol 2011; 4(1): 61-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12194-010-0106-x] [PMID: 20882375]
[18]
Nakai T, Muraki S, Bagarinao E, et al. Application of independent component analysis to magnetic resonance imaging for enhancing the contrast of gray and white matter. Neuroimage 2004; 21(1): 251-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.036] [PMID: 14741663]
[19]
Ouyang YC, Chen HM, Chai JW, et al. Band expansion-based over-complete independent component analysis for multispectral processing of magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008; 55(6): 1666-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2008.919107] [PMID: 18714830]
[20]
Chai JW, Chi-Chang Chen C, Chiang CM, et al. Quantitative analysis in clinical applications of brain MRI using independent component analysis coupled with support vector machine. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32(1): 24-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22210] [PMID: 20578007]
[21]
Chai JW, Chen CCC, Wu YY, et al. Robust volume assessment of brain tissues for 3-dimensional fourier transformation MRI via a novel multispectral technique. PLoS One 2015; 10(2): 1-13.
[22]
Chang C-I. Hyperspectral imaging: Techniques for spectral detection and classification. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2003; pp. 89-102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9170-6_6]
[23]
Reed IS, Yu X. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 1990; 38: 1760-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/29.60107]
[24]
Chang C-I, Chiang SS. Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2002; 40: 1314-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.800280]
[25]
BrainWeb. Available from:. http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/brain-web/
[26]
Lesion segmentation toolbox. Available from:. http://www.applied-statistics.de/lst.html

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
15
3
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy