Abstract
There are two modern evolutionary theories of mammal senescence: Programmed theories contend that mammals purposely limit their lifespans because doing so creates an evolutionary advantage. Non-programmed theories contend that each mammal specie only needs a particular lifespan and therefore only evolved and retained the capability for attaining that lifespan. Arguments over the evolutionary nature of aging have now existed for more than 150 years and for reasons described here may never be definitively resolved.
The programmed/ non-programmed question is critical to medical research because the theories have grossly different predictions regarding the biological mechanisms associated with the aging process and therefore, the nature of age-related diseases and conditions.
This article describes and compares two approaches for avoiding the need to obtain resolution on the evolutionary basis of senescence in order to identify and characterize the biological mechanisms responsible for aging and therefore the nature of highly age-related diseases.
Keywords: Aging, ageing, senescence, gerontology, medical research policy.
Current Aging Science
Title:Is the Evolutionary Programmed/ Non-programmed Aging Argument Moot?
Volume: 8 Issue: 1
Author(s): Theodore C. Goldsmith
Affiliation:
Keywords: Aging, ageing, senescence, gerontology, medical research policy.
Abstract: There are two modern evolutionary theories of mammal senescence: Programmed theories contend that mammals purposely limit their lifespans because doing so creates an evolutionary advantage. Non-programmed theories contend that each mammal specie only needs a particular lifespan and therefore only evolved and retained the capability for attaining that lifespan. Arguments over the evolutionary nature of aging have now existed for more than 150 years and for reasons described here may never be definitively resolved.
The programmed/ non-programmed question is critical to medical research because the theories have grossly different predictions regarding the biological mechanisms associated with the aging process and therefore, the nature of age-related diseases and conditions.
This article describes and compares two approaches for avoiding the need to obtain resolution on the evolutionary basis of senescence in order to identify and characterize the biological mechanisms responsible for aging and therefore the nature of highly age-related diseases.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Goldsmith C. Theodore, Is the Evolutionary Programmed/ Non-programmed Aging Argument Moot?, Current Aging Science 2015; 8 (1) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874609808666150422104524
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874609808666150422104524 |
Print ISSN 1874-6098 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1874-6128 |
- Author Guidelines
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers
Related Articles
-
Nitric Oxide-Mediated Endothelial Dysfunction - Is there Need to Treat?
Current Vascular Pharmacology The Utility of Emerging Biomarkers and Imaging for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk
Current Vascular Pharmacology Radionuclide Imaging in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure
Current Medical Imaging Bioactive Polyphenols from Healthy Diets and Forest Biomass
Current Nutrition & Food Science Assessment of Endothelial Function by Positron Emission Tomography
Current Cardiology Reviews Echocardiographic Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill Patient
Current Cardiology Reviews Mutation p.S335X in GATA4 Reduces its DNA Binding Affinity and Enhances Cell Apoptosis Associated with Ventricular Septal Defect
Current Molecular Medicine Calcific Aortic Stenosis: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms, Medical Treatment Alternatives
Current Cardiology Reviews Coronary Artery Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease - A Clinical Perspective
Current Hypertension Reviews Regulatory Mechanisms of Cardiac Development and Repair
Cardiovascular & Hematological Disorders-Drug Targets Mitochondrial Tolerance to Drugs and Toxic Agents in Ageing and Disease
Current Drug Targets Epigenetic Regulation of Myocardial Homeostasis, Self-Regeneration and Senescence
Current Drug Targets Novel Lipid and Polymeric Materials as Delivery Systems for Nucleic Acid Based Drugs
Current Drug Metabolism Preclinical Testing of Drug-Induced Proarrhythmia: Value of Transgenic Models
Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry Psoriatic Arthritis – Review of the Immunologic, Clinic and Therapeutic Aspects of an Inflammatory Systemic Disease
Current Rheumatology Reviews A Coadunation of Biological and Mathematical Perspectives on the Pandemic COVID-19: A Review
Coronaviruses Histone Methylation and Transcriptional Regulation in Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiovascular & Hematological Disorders-Drug Targets Adiponectin and Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms and New Therapeutic Approaches
Current Medicinal Chemistry Impact of Fenofibrate on Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Features of the Metabolic Syndrome: Subgroup Analysis From FIELD
Current Cardiology Reviews Imaging Patterns of Cardiovascular Involvement in Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Evaluated by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Inflammation & Allergy - Drug Targets (Discontinued)