Abstract
In vitro lipolysis has emerged as a powerful tool in the development of in vitro in vivo correlation for Lipid-based Drug Delivery System (LbDDS). In vitro lipolysis possesses the ability to mimic the assimilation of LbDDS in the human biological system. The digestion medium for in vitro lipolysis commonly contains an aqueous buffer media, bile salts, phospholipids and sodium chloride. The concentrations of these compounds are defined by the physiological conditions prevailing in the fasted or fed state. The pH of the medium is monitored by a pH-sensitive electrode connected to a computercontrolled pH-stat device capable of maintaining a predefined pH value via titration with sodium hydroxide. Copenhagen, Monash and Jerusalem are used as different models for in vitro lipolysis studies. The most common approach used in evaluating the kinetics of lipolysis of emulsion-based encapsulation systems is the pH-stat titration technique. This is widely used in both the nutritional and the pharmacological research fields as a rapid screening tool. Analytical tools for the assessment of in vitro lipolysis include HPLC, GC, HPTLC, SEM, Cryo TEM, Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) for the characterization of the lipids and colloidal phases after digestion of lipids. Various researches have been carried out for the establishment of IVIVC by using in vitro lipolysis models. The current publication also presents an updated review of various researches in the field of in vitro lipolysis.
Keywords: In vitro lipolysis, IVIVC, lipase, pH stat, lipid based drug delivery systems, lipid digestion, biorelevant media.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2013.10.001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874126601004020002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.03.021] [PMID: 18499294]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.23054] [PMID: 22294458]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.432636] [PMID: 432636]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2014.09.001] [PMID: 26579403]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.04.027] [PMID: 25936853]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.03.002] [PMID: 21392564]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.21659] [PMID: 19130605]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015987223407] [PMID: 3244622]
[PMID: 9548594]
[PMID: 7315970]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-006-9054-x] [PMID: 16902814]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf101325m] [PMID: 20557040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00169-5] [PMID: 11500257]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.21246] [PMID: 18064698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.10.023] [PMID: 18065173]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.06.001] [PMID: 19508887]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210303108666180313141956]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9589-4] [PMID: 24687210]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.22226] [PMID: 20574997]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.03.010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015956104500] [PMID: 2762220]
[PMID: 9548594]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2012.11.004] [PMID: 23178440]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.014] [PMID: 23561161]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.034] [PMID: 21134406]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2016.1214990] [PMID: 27685505]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015939307478] [PMID: 3244623]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00054-4]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600640910] [PMID: 1185560]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.007] [PMID: 24056027]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.01.017] [PMID: 17329087]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000036914.22132.cc] [PMID: 15359575]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.01.022] [PMID: 18367386]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.12.006] [PMID: 15734305]