Abstract
Scientists seldom know the differences between “rejected invention”, “non-invention”, “incomplete invention”, “invention yet to be completed” and “defective invention“. The Japanese Supreme Court appointed me as a specialist member (Article 92-2, Code of Civil Procedure) of intellectual property division for medical and biological patents. Herein, I present scientists to the differences and which of them are patentable. In order to prevent oneself from being taken for granted for the scientists noblesse oblige by clever business administrations, the scientists must know the borderline between patentable or non-patentable.
Keywords: Rejected invention, non-invention, incomplete invention, invention yet to be completed, defective invention
Related Journals
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets
Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets
Anti-Infective Agents
Coronaviruses
Recent Advances in Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery
Current Probiotics
Related Books
The NLRP3 Inflammasome: An Attentive Arbiter of Inflammatory Response
Natural Immunomodulators: Promising Therapy for Disease Management
Herbal Immunity Boosters Against COVID-19
Mitochondrial DNA and the Immuno-inflammatory Response: New Frontiers to Control Specific Microbial Diseases
Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research – Anti Allergy Agents
Frontiers in Inflammation
12