Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Mini-Review Article

A Mini Review on the Opportunities for Membrane Pervaporation Technology for Energy-efficient Removal of Dispersed Oil and Dissolved Hydrocarbons from Produced Water

Author(s): Jimoh K. Adewole*, Anteneh M. Yeneneh, Habeebllah B. Oladipo and Asma S.K. Al Kharusi

Volume 17, Issue 4, 2024

Published on: 11 September, 2024

Page: [281 - 295] Pages: 15

DOI: 10.2174/0124055204328836240905060014

Price: $65

Abstract

Produced water is reported to have the largest volume of waste stream associated with hydrocarbon recovery. It was estimated to increase from 250 million B/D in 2007 to more than 300 million B/D between 2010 and 2012. Market research conducted by Adroit put the globally produced water treatment market at a value of USD 5.10 billion in 2022. This value is anticipated to be USD 9.80 billion in 2032 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.80% over the prediction period. Oil and gas companies have been mandated to comply with the newly enacted environmental regulations that require extensive treatment of this water before discharge or reuse. The limited quantity of freshwater resources coupled with the increasing oil and gas production activities has made it necessary for all stakeholders to look for sustainable management of this water. Presently, a certain percentage of produced water is reused while the rest is discharged into the ocean. In both cases, the water needs to be thoroughly treated. The choice of technologies for produced water treatment depends on numerous factors, such as the chemical composition of the water and the level of purity that must be attained before disposal, recycling, or re-use. Some of the technologies used for produced water treatment include physical separation methods such as gravity, adsorption, filtration, coalescence, cyclones, flotation, centrifuges, membranes, and oxidation. There are also chemical and biological separation methods. Contaminants such as small droplets of dispersed oil and dissolved hydrocarbons (DODHs) are very challenging to remove using the above-listed water treatment technologies. Moreover, the use of membrane technology has been limited only to the use of reverse osmosis and membrane filtration for removing salinity, metals, and other inorganics. This article highlights the opportunities for the use of membrane vapor permeation and pervaporation for the removal of the small droplets of DODHs, which have been reported to be very challenging contaminants to remove. The use of 3D printing technology for the fabrication of membrane materials was reviewed. The 3D membrane development method can be used to fabricate almost any shape of the material in a highly customized manner using computer-aided design. The information presented in this article will serve as a useful reference for the technologies used for a sustainable water treatment strategy in the oil and gas industry.

Keywords: Energy efficiency, membrane separation technology, sustainable water management, oil and gas production, 3D printing technology.

[2]
Grand challenges facing the E&P industry. 2016. Available from: https://www.spe.org/en/industry/globalchallenges/
[3]
Halsey T, Agrawal G, Bailey JR, et al. Grand challenges for the oil and gas industry for the next decade and beyond. J Pet Technol 2023; 75(7): 52-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/0723-0052-JPT]
[4]
Singh R. Hybrid membrane systems – Applications and case studies. Hybrid Membrane Systems for Water Purification 2005; 3: 131-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-185617442-8/50004-X]
[5]
Kusworo TD, Aryanti N. Qudratun, Utomo DP. Oilfield produced water treatment to clean water using integrated activated carbon-bentonite adsorbent and double stages membrane process. Chem Eng J 2018; 347: 462-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.136]
[6]
Hirayama A, Maegaito M, Kawaguchi M, et al. Omani oil fields produced water: Treatment and utilization.
[http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2118/74413-MS]
[7]
What does Produced Water Contain? 2019. Available from: www.halliburton.com
[8]
Eds 2 - Properties of fluids. In: Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann 2007; pp. 43-79.
[9]
Emmons RV, Shyam Sunder GS, Liden T, et al. Unraveling the complex composition of produced water by specialized extraction methodologies. Environ Sci Technol 2022; 56(4): 2334-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05826] [PMID: 35080868]
[10]
Liu Y, Lu H, Li Y, et al. A review of treatment technologies for produced water in offshore oil and gas fields. Sci Total Environ 2021; 775: 145485.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145485] [PMID: 33618302]
[11]
Liang Y, Ning Y, Liao L, Yuan B. Special focus on produced water in oil and gas fields: Origin, management, and reinjection practice. In: InFormation Damage During Improved Oil Recovery. Gulf Professional Publishing 2018; pp. 515-86.
[12]
Feder J. Reuse of produced water grows in the oil and gas industry. J Pet Technol 2020; 72(12): 60-1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1220-0060-JPT]
[13]
Patni H, Ragunathan B. Recycling and re-usage of oilfield produced water – A review. Mater Today Proc 2023; 77: 307-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.372]
[14]
Richardson NA, Tilstone AM. The use of a weight-of-evidence approach in assessing the ecological effects of produced water discharge offshore Nigeria. Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment. Long Beach, California, USA March 2014..
[http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2118/168539-MS]
[15]
Arnold K, Stwart M. Produced water treating systems. In: Surface Production Operations, 3thed. USA: Gulf Professional publishing 2008; pp. 482-609.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067853-7.50012-0]
[16]
Amakiri KT, Canon AR, Molinari M, Angelis-Dimakis A. Review of oilfield produced water treatment technologies. Chemosphere 2022; 298: 134064.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134064] [PMID: 35240151]
[17]
Vane LM. Review: membrane materials for the removal of water from industrial solvents by pervaporation and vapor permeation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2019; 94(2): 343-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5839] [PMID: 30930521]
[18]
Adewole JK, Ahmad AL, Ismail S, Leo CP. Current challenges in membrane separation of CO2 from natural gas: A review. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2013; 17: 46-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.012]
[19]
Khan NA, Singh S, López-Maldonado EA, et al. Emerging membrane technology and hybrid treatment systems for the removal of micropollutants from wastewater. Desalination 2023; 565: 116873.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116873]
[20]
Ali SA, Sengupta S. Octyl silane modified nano alumina-polydimethylsiloxane composite membrane for pervaporative desulfurization of model gasoline. J Environ Chem Eng 2023; 11(5): 110504.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110504]
[21]
Jafari A, Mortaheb HR. Incorporating graphene nanosheets in PDMS membrane: Effects of filler functionalization on pervaporation performance. Chem Eng Process 2023; 191: 109464.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109464]
[22]
Adewole JK, Ahmad AL. Polymeric membrane materials selection for high-pressure CO2 removal from natural gas. J Polym Res 2017; 24(5): 70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10965-017-1231-6]
[23]
Koros WJ, Kratochvil A, Shu S, Husain S. Energy and environmental issues and impacts of membranes in industry. In: Membrane Operations: Innovative Separations and Transformations. Wiley 2009; pp. 139-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9783527626779.ch7]
[24]
Koros WJ, Lively RP, Biofuels A, Drive BG, Springs B. Water and Beyond. Expanding the Spectrum Processes 2012; 58(9): 2624.
[25]
Vaughn JT, Koros WJ, Johnson JR, Karvan O. Effect of thermal annealing on a novel polyamide–imide polymer membrane for aggressive acid gas separations. J Membr Sci 2012; 401-402: 163-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.047]
[26]
Adewole JK, Sultan AS. Polymeric membranes for natural gas processing: Polymer synthesis and membrane gas transport properties BT - Functional Polymers. In: Jafar Mazumder MA, Sheardown H, Al-Ahmed A, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2019; pp. 941-76.
[27]
Baker RW. Vapor and gas separation by membranes.In: Advanced membrane technology and applications. Wiley 2008; pp. 557-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470276280.ch21]
[28]
Baker RW, Wijmans JG, Kaschemekat JH. The design of membrane vapor–gas separation systems. J Membr Sci 1998; 151(1): 55-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00248-8]
[29]
Cheng X, Pan F, Wang M, et al. Hybrid membranes for pervaporation separations. J Membr Sci 2017; 541: 329-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.009]
[30]
Wijmans JG, Baker RW. The solution-diffusion model: A unified approach to membrane permeation. In: Materials science of membranes for gas and vapor separation. Wiley 2006; pp. 159-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047002903X.ch5]
[31]
Van der Bruggen B, Luis P. Pervaporation as a tool in chemical engineering: A new era? Curr Opin Chem Eng 2014; 4: 47-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.01.005]
[32]
Liu S, Li H, Kruber B, Skiborowski M, Gao X. Process intensification by integration of distillation and vapor permeation or pervaporation - An academic and industrial perspective. Results Eng 2022; 15: 100527.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100527]
[33]
Kober PA. Pervaporation, perstillation and percrystallization. J Am Chem Soc 1917; 39(5): 944-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja02250a011]
[34]
Brüschke HE. State‐of‐the‐art of pervaporation processes in the chemical industry. In: Membrane Technology: In the Chemical Industry. Wiley 2006; pp. 151-202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/3527608788.ch10]
[35]
Lakshmy KS, Lal D, Nair A, et al. Pervaporation as a successful tool in the treatment of industrial liquid mixtures. Polymers 2022; 14(8): 1604.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14081604] [PMID: 35458354]
[36]
Böddeker KW. Terminology in pervaporation. J Membr Sci 1990; 51(3): 259-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80350-6]
[37]
Raut AM, Pangarkar VG. Pervaporation of aroma compounds using virgin and silicalite‐filled organophilic membranes: Effect of aroma compound structure and comparison with distillation selectivity. Sep Sci Technol 2005; 39(8): 1791-814.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/SS-120030772]
[38]
Van Hecke W, Hofmann T, De Wever H. Pervaporative recovery of ABE during continuous cultivation: Enhancement of performance. Bioresour Technol 2013; 129: 421-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.072] [PMID: 23262020]
[39]
Orme CJ, Harrup MK, McCoy JD, Weinkauf DH, Stewart FF. Pervaporation of water–dye, alcohol–dye, and water–alcohol mixtures using a polyphosphazene membrane. J Membr Sci 2002; 197(1-2): 89-101.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00633-0]
[40]
Semenova SI. Polymer membranes for hydrocarbon separation and removal. J Membr Sci 2004; 231(1-2): 189-207.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.022]
[41]
Adymkanov SV, Yampol’skii YP, Polyakov AM, et al. Pervaporation of alcohols through highly permeable PIM-1 polymer films. Polym Sci Ser A 2008; 50(4): 444-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X08040135]
[42]
Liu X, Jin H, Li Y, et al. Metal–organic framework ZIF-8 nanocomposite membrane for efficient recovery of furfural via pervaporation and vapor permeation. J Membr Sci 2013; 428: 498-506.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.028]
[43]
Raza W, Lee J, Raza N, Luo Y, Kim KH, Yang J. Removal of phenolic compounds from industrial waste water based on membrane-based technologies. J Ind Eng Chem 2019; 71: 1-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.11.024]
[44]
Kita H. Zeolite membranes for pervaporation and vapor permeation. In: Materials Science of Membranes. Wiley 2006; p. 373.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047002903X.ch15]
[45]
Khalid A, Aslam M, Qyyum MA, et al. Membrane separation processes for dehydration of bioethanol from fermentation broths: Recent developments, challenges, and prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019; 105: 427-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.002]
[46]
Baker RW. Pervaporation. In: Membrane Technology and Applications. Wiley 2004; pp. 355-92.
[47]
Liu G, Jin W. Pervaporation membrane materials: Recent trends and perspectives. J Membr Sci 2021; 636: 119557.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119557]
[48]
Islam MN, Zhou W, Honda T, Tanaka K, Kita H, Okamoto K. Preparation and gas separation performance of flexible pyrolytic membranes by low-temperature pyrolysis of sulfonated polyimides. J Membr Sci 2005; 261(1-2): 17-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.02.019]
[49]
Okamoto K, Kita H, Horii K, Kondo KT. Zeolite NaA membrane: Preparation, single-gas permeation, and pervaporation and vapor permeation of water/organic liquid mixtures. Ind Eng Chem Res 2001; 40(1): 163-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0006007]
[50]
Masuda T, Nagai K. Synthesis and permeation properties of substituted polyacetylenes for gas separation and pervaporation. In: Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation. Wiley 2006; pp. 231-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047002903X.ch8]
[51]
Tanaka K, Okamoto KI. Structure and transport properties of polyimides as materials for gas and vapor membrane separation. In: Materials science of membranes for gas and vapor separation. Wiley 2006; pp. 271-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047002903X.ch10]
[52]
Moulik S, Moulik S, Parakala S, Sridhar S, Sridhar S. Tackling challenging industrial separation problems through membrane technology. In: Membrane Processes: Pervaporation, Vapor Permeation and Membrane Distillation for Industrial Scale Separations. Wiley 2018; pp. 1-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119418399.ch1]
[53]
Khan R, Ul Haq I, Mao H, et al. Enhancing the pervaporation performance of PEBA/PVDF membrane by incorporating MAF-6 for the separation of phenol from its aqueous solution. Separ Purif Tech 2021; 256: 117804.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117804]
[54]
Rohani R, Pakizeh M, Chenar MP. Toluene/water separation using MCM-41/PEBA mixed matrix membrane via pervaporation process. J Membr Sci 2022; 662: 120988.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120988]
[55]
Merkel TC, Pinnau I, Prabhakar R, Freeman BD. Gas and vapor transport properties of perfluoropolymers. In: Gas and vapor transport properties of perfluoropolymers. Wiley 2006.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/047002903X.ch9]
[56]
Meijer D, Madin C. Removal of dissolved and dispersed hydrocarbons from oil and gas produced water with macro porous polymer extraction technology to reduce toxicity and allow water reuse. APPEA J 2010; 50(1): 637-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AJ09041]
[57]
Turnbull RW, Tulloch SJ. Dissolved component removal from oilfield waters. In: InProduced Water 2: Environmental Issues and Mitigation Technologies. Boston, MA: Springer US 1996; pp. 425-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0379-4_39]
[58]
Smathers C, Jackson T, Buckwald S, Gonzalo R, McPherson R. Removing dispersed and dissolved hydrocarbons from water using adsorption media systems with multiple regeneration processes. . InSPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition. Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 2018 Apr 23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/192355-MS]
[59]
Stewart M, Arnold K. Produced water treating systems. Emulsions and Oil Treating Equipment 2009; pp. 107-211.
[60]
Sher S, Waseem M, Leta MK. Review of techniques for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from produced water. Environments 2023; 10(3): 40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/environments10030040]
[61]
Beyer J, Goksøyr A, Hjermann DØ, Klungsøyr J. Environmental effects of offshore produced water discharges: A review focused on the Norwegian continental shelf. Mar Environ Res 2020; 162: 105155.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105155] [PMID: 32992224]
[62]
Bakke T, Klungsøyr J, Sanni S. Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry. Mar Environ Res 2013; 92: 154-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.09.012] [PMID: 24119441]
[63]
Meijer DT, Kuijvenhoven CA. Field-proven removal of dissolved hydrocarbons from offshore produced water by the macro porous polymer-extraction technology. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas , April 2001..
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4043/13217-MS]
[64]
Thiam BG, El Magri A, Vanaei HR, Vaudreuil S. 3D printed and conventional membranes- A review. Polymers 2022; 14(5): 1023.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051023] [PMID: 35267846]
[65]
Zhou LY, Fu J, He Y. A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater 2020; 30(28): 2000187.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187]
[66]
Application of 3D-Printing in Membrane fabrication. 2018.www.membranetechbrief.com
[67]
Femmer T, Kuehne AJC, Wessling M. Print your own membrane: Direct rapid prototyping of polydimethylsiloxane. Lab Chip 2014; 14(15): 2610-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00320a] [PMID: 24828586]
[68]
Femmer T, Kuehne AJC, Wessling M. Estimation of the structure dependent performance of 3-D rapid prototyped membranes. Chem Eng J 2015; 273: 438-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.029]
[69]
Femmer T, Kuehne AJC, Torres-Rendon J, Walther A, Wessling M. Print your membrane: Rapid prototyping of complex 3D-PDMS membranes via a sacrificial resist. J Membr Sci 2015; 478: 12-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.040]
[70]
Badalov S, Arnusch CJ. Ink-jet printing assisted fabrication of thin film composite membranes. J Membr Sci 2016; 515: 79-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.046]
[71]
Badalov S, Oren Y, Arnusch CJ. Ink-jet printing assisted fabrication of patterned thin film composite membranes. J Membr Sci 2015; 493: 508-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.051]
[72]
Yuan S, Strobbe D, Kruth JP, Van Puyvelde P, Van der Bruggen B. Production of polyamide-12 membranes for microfiltration through selective laser sintering. J Membr Sci 2017; 525: 157-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.041]
[73]
Lv J, Gong Z, He Z, et al. 3D printing of a mechanically durable superhydrophobic porous membrane for oil–water separation. J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 2017; 5(24): 12435-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7TA02202F]
[74]
Seo J, Kushner DI, Hickner MA. 3D printing of micropatterned anion exchange membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016; 8(26): 16656-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b03455] [PMID: 27218137]
[75]
Low ZX, Chua YT, Ray BM, Mattia D, Metcalfe IS, Patterson DA. Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques. J Membr Sci 2017; 523: 596-613.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.006]
[76]
Thakkar H, Lawson S, Rownaghi AA, Rezaei F. Development of 3D-printed polymer-zeolite composite monoliths for gas separation. Chem Eng J 2018; 348: 109-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.178]
[77]
Shao P, Huang RYM. Polymeric membrane pervaporation. J Membr Sci 2007; 287(2): 162-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.043]
[78]
Athayde AL, Baker RW, Daniels R, Le MH, Ly JH. Pervaporation for wastewater treatment. Chemtech 1997; 27(1)
[79]
Jiraratananon R, Chanachai A, Huang RYM, Uttapap D. Pervaporation dehydration of ethanol–water mixtures with chitosan/hydroxyethylcellulose (CS/HEC) composite membranes. J Membr Sci 2002; 195(2): 143-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00563-4]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy