Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Case Report

Imaging Manifestation and Pathological Comparison of the Peritoneal Loose Body: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Author(s): Xiaoran Li, Hui Wu, Shuwen Wang, Jing Wu* and Yu-Chen Chen*

Volume 19, Issue 10, 2023

Published on: 22 December, 2022

Article ID: e251122211275 Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405619666221125153408

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal loose body (PLB) which is also called "peritoneal mouse" is a rare disease, with only a few cases reported. PLB is mostly found due to unplanned examination, surgery, or autopsy. With the increase in abdominal imaging examinations, it was gradually recognized by us. The diagnosis of PLB has three major characteristics: free movement, no blood supply, and pathological exclusion of other tumors.

Case Presentation: We reported a 66-year-old male patient with an asymptomatic freely moving peritoneal loose body. The size of the lesion was about 4*4cm. The imaging data were complete including Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance (MR), Computed tomography (CT) plain scan and enhancement. Interestingly, changes in the location of the lesion were found on follow-up CT. The lesion showed concentric circles changes on CT without obvious enhancement. MR also appeared as a multi-layer signal of concentric circles. In addition, the imaging manifestations were compared with histological pathology in this article to explain imaging characteristics.

Conclusion: PLB is an uncommon disease. Through the complete imaging examination of this case, we can further understand the mobility of the lesion by changing the position. The CT and MR have characteristic concentric circle changes without obvious enhancement. The diagnosis could be confirmed before surgery, which prompted the clinical early diagnosis of the disease, and an appropriate choice between surgery and conservative treatment.

Keywords: Peritoneal loose body, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, histopathology, lesion, surgery.

[1]
Ghahremani GG, White EM, Hoff FL, Gore RM, Miller JW, Christ ML. Appendices epiploicae of the colon: Radiologic and pathologic features. Radiographics 1992; 12(1): 59-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.1.1734482] [PMID: 1734482]
[2]
Sewkani A, Jain A, Maudar KK, Varshney S. ‘Boiled egg’ in the peritoneal cavity-a giant peritoneal loose body in a 64-year-old man: A case report. J Med Case Reports 2011; 5(1): 297.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-297] [PMID: 21736712]
[3]
Hunt VC. Torsion of appendices epiploicae. Ann Surg 1919; 69(1): 31-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-191901000-00008] [PMID: 17864042]
[4]
Thejeswi P, Thejeswi P, Prabhu S, Bhat RR. Giant peritoneal loose body: A case report and review of literature. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8(1): 187-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7352.3925] [PMID: 24596768]
[5]
Gayer G, Petrovitch I. CT diagnosis of a large peritoneal loose body: A case report and review of the literature. Br J Radiol 2011; 84(1000): e83-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/98708052] [PMID: 21415299]
[6]
Desai HP, Tripodi J, Gold BM, Burakoff R. Infarction of an epiploic appendage. Review of the literature. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993; 16(4): 323-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199306000-00012] [PMID: 8331268]
[7]
Elsner A, Walensi M, Fuenfschilling M, Rosenberg R, Mechera R. Symptomatic giant peritoneal loose body in the pelvic cavity: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 21: 32-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.02.013] [PMID: 26901087]
[8]
Cheng Y, Qu L, Li J, Wang B, Geng J, Xing D. Abdominal cocoon accompanied by multiple peritoneal loose body. Medicine 2017; 96(9): e6185.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006185] [PMID: 28248873]
[9]
Koga K, Hiroi H, Osuga Y, Nagai M, Yano T, Taketani Y. Autoamputated adnexa presents as a peritoneal loose body. Fertil Steril 2010; 93(3): 967-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.038] [PMID: 19394607]
[10]
Rubinkiewicz M, Kenig J, Zbierska K, Lasek A. Autoamputated leiomyoma of the uterus as a rare cause of the mechanical bowel obstruction - report of a case. Pol Przegl Chir 2014; 86(7): 341-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pjs-2014-0060] [PMID: 25222583]
[11]
Huang Q, Cao A, Ma J, Wang Z, Dong J. Two giant peritoneal loose bodies were simultaneously found in one patient: A case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017; 36: 74-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.05.004] [PMID: 28550786]
[12]
Mayfield J, Schammel C, Yurko Y, Schammel DP, Devane AM. Peritoneal loose bodies and the differentiation of fatty abdominal and pelvic lesions. Radiol Case Rep 2020; 15(9): 1506-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.06.040] [PMID: 32670450]
[13]
Ooyagi H, Ishida H, Komatsuda T, et al. Peritoneal loose body. J Med Ultrason 2006; 33(3): 189-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10396-006-0109-8]
[14]
Sussman R, Murdock J. Images in clinical medicine. Peritoneal loose body. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(14): 1359.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMicm1316094] [PMID: 25830426]
[15]
Rosic T, Khumalo V, Nethathe DG. A pelvic “loose” body tumour causing urinary symptoms in a 73-year-old man. S Afr J Surg 2016; 54(2): 53-4.
[PMID: 28240507]
[16]
Takayama S, Sakamoto M, Takeyama H. Clinical challenges and images in GI. Image 1: huge peritoneal loose body in the pelvic cavity. Gastroenterology 2009; 136(2): 404.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.014]
[17]
Nomura H, Hata F, Yasoshima T, et al. Giant peritoneal loose body in the pelvic cavity: Report of a case. Surg Today 2003; 33(10): 791-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-003-2573-8] [PMID: 14513332]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy