Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Review Article

Primary Tumors of the Sacrum: Imaging Findings

Author(s): Andrea Sambri*, Michele Fiore, Claudio Giannini, Valerio Pipola, Riccardo Zucchini, Maria Pilar Aparisi Gomez, Paula Musa Aguiar, Alessandro Gasbarrini and Massimiliano De Paolis

Volume 18, Issue 2, 2022

Published on: 11 May, 2021

Article ID: e120521193294 Pages: 17

DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210512011923

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

The diagnosis of sacral neoplasms is often delayed because they tend to remain clinically silent for a long time. Imaging is useful at all stages of the management of sacral bone tumors, i.e., from the detection of the neoplasm to the long-term follow-up. Radiographs are recommended as the modality of choice to begin the imaging workup of a patient with known or suspected sacral pathology. More sensitive examinations, such as Computerized Tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MRI), or scintigraphy, are often necessary. The morphological features of the lesions on CT and MRI help orientate the diagnosis. Although some imaging characteristics are helpful to limit the differential diagnosis, an imaging-guided biopsy is often ultimately required to establish a specific diagnosis. Imaging is of paramount importance even in the long-term follow-up, in order to assess any residual tumor when surgical resection remains incomplete, to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and to detect recurrence.

Keywords: Sacrum, tumor, osteolysis, bone tumor, benign, malignant.

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Gerber S, Ollivier L, Leclère J, et al. Imaging of sacral tumours. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37(4): 277-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0413-4] [PMID: 18034341]
[2]
Wang Y, Guo W, Shen D, et al. Surgical treatment of primary osteosarcoma of the sacrum: A case series of 26 patients. Spine 2017; 42(16): 1207-13.
https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2017/08150/Surgical_Treatment_of_Primary_Osteosarcoma_of_the.7.aspx

[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002043] [PMID: 27997504]
[3]
Martins I. Increased risk for obesity and diabetes with neurodegeneration in developing countries. J Mol Genet Med an Int J Biomed Res 2013; 1: S1.
[4]
Diel J, Ortiz O, Losada RA, Price DB, Hayt MW, Katz DS. The sacrum: pathologic spectrum, multimodality imaging, and subspecialty approach. Radiographics 2001; 21(1): 83-104.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja0883] [PMID: 11158646]
[5]
Ha AS, Chew FS. Imaging of sacral masses: self-assessment module. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195(Suppl. 3): S32-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7219] [PMID: 20729410]
[6]
Thornton E, Krajewski KM, O’Regan KN, Giardino AA, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya N. Imaging features of primary and secondary malignant tumours of the sacrum. Br J Radiol 2011; 85(1011): 279-86. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22167504
[7]
Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Mariani S, et al. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of soft tissue tumors: techniques and applications. Radiol Med (Torino) 2019; 124(4): 243-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01035-7] [PMID: 30949892]
[8]
Dallaudière B, Lecouvet F, Vande Berg B, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in musculoskeletal diseases: current concepts. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96(4): 327-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.10.008] [PMID: 25704147]
[9]
Ahlawat S, Khandheria P, Subhawong TK, Fayad LM. Differentiation of benign and malignant skeletal lesions with quantitative diffusion weighted MRI at 3T. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(6): 1091-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.019] [PMID: 25805331]
[10]
Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics 2014; 34(5): 1163-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.345140190] [PMID: 25208274]
[11]
Lee K, Park HY, Kim KW, et al. Advances in whole body MRI for musculoskeletal imaging: Diffusion-weighted imaging. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019; 10(4): 680-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.05.018] [PMID: 31316239]
[12]
Erlemann R. Imaging and differential diagnosis of primary bone tumors and tumor-like lesions of the spine. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58(1): 48-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.006] [PMID: 16431065]
[13]
Rodallec MH, Feydy A, Larousserie F, et al. Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics 2008; 28(4): 1019-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.284075156] [PMID: 18635627]
[14]
Murphey MD, Andrews CL, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Smith WS, Smirniotopoulos JG. From the archives of the AFIP. Primary tumors of the spine: radiologic pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1996; 16(5): 1131-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.16.5.8888395] [PMID: 8888395]
[15]
Chakarun CJ, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ, Patel DB, White EA, Matcuk GRJ Jr. Giant cell tumor of bone: review, mimics, and new developments in treatment. Radiographics 2013; 33(1): 197-211.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.331125089] [PMID: 23322837]
[16]
Lin PP, Guzel VB, Moura MF, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with giant cell tumor of the sacrum treated with selective arterial embolization. Cancer 2002; 95(6): 1317-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10803] [PMID: 12216101]
[17]
Ruggieri P, Angelini A, Vanel D, Picci P. Tumors of the sacrum: Diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant tumors 2017; 1-382. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3- 319-51202-0
[18]
Si M-J, Wang C-S, Ding X-Y, et al. Differentiation of primary chordoma, giant cell tumor and schwannoma of the sacrum by CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82(12): 2309-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.034] [PMID: 24035342]
[19]
Dahlin DC, Unni KK. Bone tumors: General aspects and data on 8,547 cases. 4th ed. United States: Charles C Thomas Pub 1986. Available from: http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_ q=RN:19041134
[20]
Disler DG, Miklic D. Imaging findings in tumors of the sacrum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173(6): 1699-706.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.6.10584822] [PMID: 10584822]
[21]
Llauger J, Palmer J, Amores S, Bagué S, Camins A. Primary tumors of the sacrum: Diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174(2): 417-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740417] [PMID: 10658718]
[22]
Al Eissa S, Al-Habib AF, Jahangiri FR. Computer-assisted navigation during an anterior-posterior En bloc resection of a sacral tumor. Cureus 2015; 7(11): e373.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.373] [PMID: 26677423]
[23]
Campanacci M. Giant-cell tumours of bone A study of 209 cases with long-term follow-up in 130. 1975.
[24]
Sambri A, Medellin MR, Errani C, et al. Denosumab in giant cell tumour of bone in the pelvis and sacrum: Long-term therapy or bone resection? J Orthop Sci 2020; 25(3): 513-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2019.05.003] [PMID: 31155442]
[25]
Campanacci L, Sambri A, Medellin MR, Cimatti P, Errani C, Donati DM. A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019; 53(5): 376-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.05.005] [PMID: 31253385]
[26]
Kwon JW, Chung HW, Cho EY, et al. MRI findings of giant cell tumors of the spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(1): 246-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1472] [PMID: 17579178]
[27]
Cheng EY, Ozerdemoglu RA, Transfeldt EE, Thompson RCJ Jr. Lumbosacral chordoma. Prognostic factors and treatment. Spine 1999; 24(16): 1639-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908150-00004] [PMID: 10472097]
[28]
Pekcevik Y, Kahya MO, Kaya A. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of bone tumors: Preliminary results. J Clin Imaging Sci 2013; 3: 63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.124094] [PMID: 24605258]
[29]
Capanna R, Van Horn JR, Biagini R, Ruggieri P. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the sacrum. Skeletal Radiol 1989; 18(2): 109-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00350658] [PMID: 2717949]
[30]
Drazin D, Bhamb N, Al-Khouja LT, et al. Image-guided resection of aggressive sacral tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42(1): E15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2016.6.FOCUS16125] [PMID: 28041320]
[31]
Kaplan PA, Murphey M, Greenway G, Resnick D, Sartoris DJ, Harms S. Fluid-fluid levels in giant cell tumors of bone: report of two cases. J Comput Tomogr 1987; 11(2): 151-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-936X(87)90008-7] [PMID: 3581850]
[32]
Tsai JC, Dalinka MK, Fallon MD, Zlatkin MB, Kressel HY. Fluid-fluid level: a nonspecific finding in tumors of bone and soft tissue. Radiology 1990; 175(3): 779-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.3.2160676] [PMID: 2160676]
[33]
Hudson TM. Fluid levels in aneurysmal bone cysts: a CT feature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142(5): 1001-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.142.5.1001] [PMID: 6609547]
[34]
Laredo JD, Assouline E, Gelbert F, Wybier M, Merland JJ, Tubiana JM. Vertebral hemangiomas: fat content as a sign of aggressiveness. Radiology 1990; 177(2): 467-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217787] [PMID: 2217787]
[35]
Feng J, Xu Y-K, Li L, et al. MRI diagnosis and preoperative evaluation for pure epidural cavernous hemangiomas. Neuroradiology 2009; 51(11): 741-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0555-2] [PMID: 19588130]
[36]
Yamaguchi T, Iwata J, Sugihara S, et al. Distinguishing benign notochordal cell tumors from vertebral chordoma. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37(4): 291-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0435-y] [PMID: 18188556]
[37]
Yamaguchi T, Yamato M, Saotome K. First histologically confirmed case of a classic chordoma arising in a precursor benign notochordal lesion: differential diagnosis of benign and malignant notochordal lesions. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31(7): 413-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-002-0514-z] [PMID: 12107574]
[38]
Nishiguchi T, Mochizuki K, Ohsawa M, et al. Differentiating benign notochordal cell tumors from chordomas: radiographic features on MRI, CT, and tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(3): 644-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4460] [PMID: 21343509]
[39]
Picci P, Manfrini M, Fabbri N, Gambarotti M, Vanel D. Atlas of musculoskeletal tumors and tumorlike lesions: The rizzoli case archive. 2014.
[40]
Pasalic D, Luetmer PH, Hunt CH, et al. Benign notochordal cell tumor of the sacrum with atypical imaging features: The value of CT guided biopsy for diagnosis. Open Neuroimaging J 2013; 7: 36-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874440001307010036] [PMID: 24478810]
[41]
Capanna R, Ayala A, Bertoni F, Picci P, Calderoni P, Gherlinzoni F, et al. Sacral osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma: a report of 13 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma surgery Arch fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie 1986; 105(4): 205-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00435481]
[42]
Jackson RP, Reckling FW, Mants FA. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Similar histologic lesions with different natural histories. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; (128): 303-13.
[PMID: 598169]
[43]
Gamba JL, Martinez S, Apple J, Harrelson JM, Nunley JA. Computed tomography of axial skeletal osteoid osteomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142(4): 769-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.142.4.769] [PMID: 6608238]
[44]
Biagini R, Orsini U, Demitri S, et al. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the sacrum. Orthopedics 2001; 24(11): 1061-4.
[PMID: 11727803]
[45]
Zileli M, Cagli S, Basdemir G, Ersahin Y. Osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas of the spine. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15(5): E5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/foc.2003.15.5.5] [PMID: 15323462]
[46]
Abdel Razek AAK, Castillo M. Imaging appearance of primary bony tumors and pseudo-tumors of the spine. J Neuroradiol 2010; 37(1): 37-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2009.08.006] [PMID: 19781780]
[47]
Helms CA. Osteoid osteoma. The double density sign. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (222): 167-73.
[PMID: 3621716]
[48]
Ruggieri P, Huch K, Mavrogenis AF, Merlino B, Angelini A. Osteoblastoma of the sacrum: report of 18 cases and analysis of the literature. Spine 2014; 39(2): E97-E103.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000061] [PMID: 24108284]
[49]
Kroon HM, Schurmans J. Osteoblastoma: clinical and radiologic findings in 98 new cases. Radiology 1990; 175(3): 783-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343130] [PMID: 2343130]
[50]
Atesok KI, Alman BA, Schemitsch EH, Peyser A, Mankin H. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19(11): 678-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201111000-00004] [PMID: 22052644]
[51]
Kan P, Schmidt MH. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008; 19(1): 65-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2007.09.003] [PMID: 18156049]
[52]
Chai JW, Hong SH, Choi J-Y, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of osteoid osteoma: from simple to challenging findings. Radiographics 2010; 30(3): 737-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.303095120] [PMID: 20462991]
[53]
Manaster BJ, Graham T. Imaging of sacral tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15(2): E2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/foc.2003.15.2.2] [PMID: 15350033]
[54]
Samartzis D, Marco RAW. Osteochondroma of the sacrum: a case report and review of the literature. Spine 2006; 31(13): E425-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000220222.63828.d3] [PMID: 16741444]
[55]
Chin KR, Kim JM. A rare anterior sacral osteochondroma presenting as sciatica in an adult: a case report and review of the literature. Spine J 2010; 10(5): e1-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.018] [PMID: 20421072]
[56]
Barros Filho TE, Oliveira RP, Taricco MA, Gonzalez CH. Hereditary multiple exostoses and cervical ventral protuberance causing dysphagia. A case report. Spine 1995; 20(14): 1640-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199507150-00015] [PMID: 7570182]
[57]
Ong KO, Ritchie DA. Pictorial essay: tumours and pseudotumours of sacrum. Can Assoc Radiol 2014; 65(2): 113-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2013.05.002]
[58]
Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20(5): 1407-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se171407] [PMID: 10992031]
[59]
Desai KI. The surgical management of symptomatic benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the neck and extremities: An experience of 442 cases. Neurosurgery 2017; 81(4): 568-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx076] [PMID: 28475798]
[60]
Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, Giannini C, Perry A. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems. Acta Neuropathol 2012; 123(3): 295-319.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z] [PMID: 22327363]
[61]
Karabatsou K, Kiehl T-R, Wilson DM, Hendler A, Guha A. Potential role of 18fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in differentiating benign neurofibroma from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor associated with neurofibromatosis 1. Neurosurgery 2009; 65(Suppl. 4): A160-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000337597.18599.D3] [PMID: 19927062]
[62]
Primrose JN. Soft tissue tumours. 284 × 220 mm Pp 1120 Illustrated. 3rd ed. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby-Year-Book. £160. BJS (British J Surgery) 1995.
[63]
Aparisi Gómez MP, Errani C, Lalam R, et al. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24(2): 135-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402060] [PMID: 32438440]
[64]
Ortolan EG, Sola CA, Gruenberg MF, Carballo Vazquez F. Giant sacral schwannoma. A case report. Spine 1996; 21(4): 522-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199602150-00023] [PMID: 8658260]
[65]
Çağlı S, Işık HS, Yıldırım U, Akıntürk N, Zileli M. Giant sacral schwannomas. J Neurooncol 2012; 110(1): 105-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0941-1] [PMID: 22806341]
[66]
Kim SH, Choi BI, Han MC, Kim YI. Retroperitoneal neurilemoma: CT and MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159(5): 1023-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.159.5.1414767] [PMID: 1414767]
[67]
Takatera H, Takiuchi H, Namiki M, Takaha M, Ohnishi S, Sonoda T. Retroperitoneal schwannoma. Urology 1986; 28(6): 529-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(86)90161-5] [PMID: 3787928]
[68]
Beaman FD, Kransdorf MJ, Menke DM. Schwannoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2004; 24(5): 1477-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.245045001] [PMID: 15371621]
[69]
Lin J, Martel W. Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176(1): 75-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760075] [PMID: 11133542]
[70]
Wasa J, Nishida Y, Tsukushi S, et al. MRI features in the differentiation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and neurofibromas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(6): 1568-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2724] [PMID: 20489098]
[71]
Mohta A, Das S, Jindal R. Anterior sacral meningocele presenting as constipation. J Pediatr Neurosci 2011; 6(1): 40-3.
[PMID: 21977087]
[72]
Hain KS, Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Menias CO, Bhalla S. Presacral masses: multimodality imaging of a multidisciplinary space. Radiographics 2013; 33(4): 1145-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.334115171] [PMID: 23842976]
[73]
Andrieux C, Poglia P, Laudato P. Tarlov Cyst: A diagnostic of exclusion. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017; 39: 25-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.07.045] [PMID: 28787671]
[74]
Paulsen RD, Call GA, Murtagh FR. Prevalence and percutaneous drainage of cysts of the sacral nerve root sheath (Tarlov cysts). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15(2): 293-7.
[PMID: 8192075]
[75]
Patel MR, Louie W, Rachlin J. Percutaneous fibrin glue therapy of meningeal cysts of the sacral spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168(2): 367-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016209] [PMID: 9016209]
[76]
Davis SW, Levy LM, LeBihan DJ, Rajan S, Schellinger D. Sacral meningeal cysts: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 187(2): 445-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475288] [PMID: 8475288]
[77]
Manara R, Severino M, Mandari R, Mattisi G, Dal Pozzo S, Carollo C. Chronic cystic lesion of the sacrum: characterisation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiol Med (Torino) 2008; 113(5): 739-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0283-4] [PMID: 18523843]
[78]
Baran GA, McDonald DJ, Sundaram M. Radiologic case study. Monostotic Paget’s disease in the sacrum. Orthopedics 1989; 12(5): 750-751, 754-756.
[PMID: 2657685]
[79]
Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Papapoulos SE. Paget’s disease of bone. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 32(5): 657-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2018.05.005] [PMID: 30449547]
[80]
Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Kakitsubata Y. Imaging of Paget disease of bone and its musculoskeletal complications: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(Suppl. 6): S64-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.7222] [PMID: 21606236]
[81]
Moore TE, King AR, Kathol MH, el-Khoury GY, Palmer R, Downey PR. Sarcoma in Paget disease of bone: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features in 22 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156(6): 1199-203.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.156.6.2028867] [PMID: 2028867]
[82]
Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics 2003; 23(2): 341-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.232025103] [PMID: 12640151]
[83]
Cook GJ, Maisey MN, Fogelman I. Fluorine-18-FDG PET in Paget’s disease of bone. J Nucl Med 1997; 38(9): 1495-7.
[PMID: 9293817]
[84]
Park ET, Kim S-E. Radiography, bone scan, and F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging findings in a patient with paget’s disease. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 44(1): 87-9.
[85]
Winn N, Lalam R, Cassar-Pullicino V. Imaging of Paget’s disease of bone. Wien Med Wochenschr 2017; 167(1-2): 9-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-016-0517-3] [PMID: 27761746]
[86]
Vogler JB III, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 1988; 168(3): 679-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.3.3043546] [PMID: 3043546]
[87]
Shah LM, Hanrahan CJ. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part I, techniques and normal age-related appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(6): 1298-308.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7005] [PMID: 22109283]
[88]
Hanrahan CJ, Shah LM. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part 2, T1-weighted imaging-based differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(6): 1309-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7420] [PMID: 22109284]
[89]
Howe BM, Johnson GB, Wenger DE. Current concepts in MRI of focal and diffuse malignancy of bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013; 17(2): 137-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1343069] [PMID: 23673545]
[90]
Eggers H, Börnert P. Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40(2): 251-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24568] [PMID: 24446249]
[91]
Einarsdóttir H, Karlsson M, Wejde J, Bauer HCF. Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours. Eur Radiol 2004; 14(6): 959-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2237-0] [PMID: 14767604]
[92]
Peh WC, Khong PL, Yin Y, et al. Imaging of pelvic insufficiency fractures. Radiographics 1996; 16(2): 335-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.16.2.8966291] [PMID: 8966291]
[93]
Cooper KL, Beabout JW, Swee RG. Insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. Radiology 1985; 156(1): 15-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.156.1.4001403] [PMID: 4001403]
[94]
Aparisi Gómez MP. Nonspinal fragility fractures. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2016; 20(4): 330-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592434] [PMID: 27842426]
[95]
Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, Link TM. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191(4): 995-1001.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3714] [PMID: 18806133]
[96]
Byun WM, Jang HW, Kim SW, Jang SH, Ahn SH, Ahn MW. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of sacral insufficiency fractures: comparison with metastases of the sacrum. Spine 2007; 32(26): E820-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815ce70c] [PMID: 18091477]
[97]
Torricelli P, Martinelli C, Biagini R, Ruggieri P, De Cristofaro R. Radiographic and computed tomographic findings in hydatid disease of bone. Skeletal Radiol 1990; 19(6): 435-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00241799] [PMID: 2218593]
[98]
Booz MY. The value of plain film findings in hydatid disease of bone. Clin Radiol 1993; 47(4): 265-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81136-5] [PMID: 8495574]
[99]
Akhan O, Dinçer A, Saatçi I, Gülekon N, Besim A. Spinal intradural hydatid cyst in a child. Br J Radiol 1991; 64(761): 465-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-64-761-465] [PMID: 2036575]
[100]
Apt WL, Fierro JL, Calderon C, Perez C, Mujica P. Vertebral hydatid disease. Clinical experience with 27 cases. J Neurosurg 1976; 44(1): 72-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1976.44.1.0072] [PMID: 1244436]
[101]
Bonakdarpour A. Echinococcus disease. Report of 112 cases from Iran and a review of 611 cases from the United States. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1967; 99(3): 660-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.99.3.660] [PMID: 6020644]
[102]
Braithwaite PA, Lees RF. Vertebral hydatid disease: radiological assessment. Radiology 1981; 140(3): 763-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.140.3.7280247] [PMID: 7280247]
[103]
Marani SA, Canossi GC, Nicoli FA, Alberti GP, Monni SG, Casolo PM. Hydatid disease: MR imaging study. Radiology 1990; 175(3): 701-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343117] [PMID: 2343117]
[104]
Inan N, Akhun N, Akansel G, Arslan A, Ciftçi E, Demirci A. Conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI of extrahepatic hydatid cysts. Diagn Interv Radiol 2010; 16(2): 168-74.
[PMID: 20140855]
[105]
Guthrie JA, Lawton JO, Chalmers AG. Case report: The MR appearances of primary intramuscular hydatid disease. Clin Radiol 1996; 51(5): 377-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80122-X] [PMID: 8641107]
[106]
Singh P, Shankar S, Sharma BS, Nk V, Khandelwal N, Suri S. MRI in sacral echinococcosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24(1): 176-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200001000-00031] [PMID: 10667679]
[107]
Kyriakos M. Benign notochordal lesions of the axial skeleton: a review and current appraisal. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40(9): 1141-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1167-6] [PMID: 21847746]
[108]
Yeom KW, Lober RM, Mobley BC, Harsh G, Vogel H, Allagio R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI: distinction of skull base chordoma from chondrosarcoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34(5): 1056-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3333]
[109]
Kreshak J, Larousserie F, Picci P, Boriani S, Mirra J, Merlino B, et al. Difficulty distinguishing benign notochordal cell tumor from chordoma further suggests a link between them. Cancer Imaging Off Publ Int Cancer Imaging Soc 2014; 14(1): 4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1470-7330-14-4]
[110]
Barwick KW, Huvos AG, Smith J. Primary osteogenic sarcoma of the vertebral column: a clinicopathologic correlation of ten patients. Cancer 1980; 46(3): 595-604.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800801)46:3<595::AID-CNCR2820460328>3.0.CO;2-8] [PMID: 6930985]
[111]
Aponte-Tinao LA, Ritacco LE, Milano FE, Ayerza MA, Farfalli GF. Techniques in surgical navigation of extremity tumors: state of the art. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2015; 8(4): 319-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9305-8] [PMID: 26408148]
[112]
Sung MS, Lee GK, Kang HS, et al. Sacrococcygeal chordoma: MR imaging in 30 patients. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34(2): 87-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-004-0840-4] [PMID: 15480648]
[113]
Stacchiotti S, Sommer J. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16(2): e71-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71190-8] [PMID: 25638683]
[114]
Ilaslan H, Sundaram M, Unni KK, Shives TC. Primary vertebral osteosarcoma: imaging findings. Radiology 2004; 230(3): 697-702.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303030226] [PMID: 14749514]
[115]
Müller U, Kubik-Huch RA, Ares C, et al. Is there a role for conventional MRI and MR diffusion-weighted imaging for distinction of skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma? Acta Radiol 2016; 57(2): 225-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185115574156] [PMID: 25722460]
[116]
Bier G, Kloth C, Schabel C, Bongers M, Nikolaou K, Horger M. Vertebral lesion distribution in multiple myeloma-assessed by reduced-dose whole-body MDCT. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45(1): 127-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2268-4] [PMID: 26476728]
[117]
Ak R, Akoğlu EÜ, Onur ÖE. Diffuse punched out lesions in multiple myeloma. Bull Emerg Trauma 2016; 4(3): 180-1. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27540555
[PMID: 27540555]
[118]
Nayil K, Makhdoomi R, Ramzan A, et al. Primary sacral lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2011; 21(4): 659-62.
[PMID: 22194134]
[119]
Krishnan A, Shirkhoda A, Tehranzadeh J, Armin AR, Irwin R, Les K. Primary bone lymphoma: radiographic-MR imaging correlation. Radiographics 2003; 23(6): 1371-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.236025056] [PMID: 14615550]
[120]
Mulligan ME, McRae GA, Murphey MD. Imaging features of primary lymphoma of bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173(6): 1691-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.6.10584821] [PMID: 10584821]
[121]
Barakat MI, Abdelaal SM, Saleh AM. Sacrococcygeal teratoma in infants and children. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153(9): 1781-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1048-8] [PMID: 21604208]
[122]
Schneider DT, Calaminus G, Koch S, et al. Epidemiologic analysis of 1,442 children and adolescents registered in the German germ cell tumor protocols. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004; 42(2): 169-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.10321] [PMID: 14752882]
[123]
Ng EW, Porcu P, Loehrer PJS Sr. Sacrococcygeal teratoma in adults: case reports and a review of the literature. Cancer 1999; 86(7): 1198-202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991001)86:7<1198::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-M] [PMID: 10506704]
[124]
Kaste SC, Bridges JO, Marina NM. Sacrococcygeal yolk sac carcinoma: imaging findings during treatment. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26(3): 212-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01405303] [PMID: 8599013]
[125]
Dedushi K, Kabashi S, Mucaj S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging verification of a case of sacrococcygeal teratoma. World J Oncol 2016; 7(4): 81-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon965w] [PMID: 28983369]
[126]
Kocaoglu M, Frush DP. Pediatric presacral masses. Radiographics 2006; 26(3): 833-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.263055102] [PMID: 16702458]
[127]
Shirley SK, Gilula LA, Siegal GP, Foulkes MA, Kissane JM, Askin FB. Roentgenographic-pathologic correlation of diffuse sclerosis in Ewing sarcoma of bone. Skeletal Radiol 1984; 12(2): 69-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00360810] [PMID: 6484604]
[128]
Whitehouse GH, Griffiths GJ. Roentgenologic aspects of spinal involvement by primary and metastatic Ewing’s tumor. J Can Assoc Radiol 1976; 27(4): 290-7.
[PMID: 993244]
[129]
Srinivasalu S, D’Souza A. Sacral ewing’s Sarcoma and Challenges in it’s Diagnosis on MRI. J Radiol Case Rep 2009; 3(1): 23-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v3i1.79] [PMID: 22470616]
[130]
Bovée JVMG, Hogendoorn PCW, Wunder JS, Alman BA. Cartilage tumours and bone development: molecular pathology and possible therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10(7): 481-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2869] [PMID: 20535132]
[131]
Shives TC, McLeod RA, Unni KK, Schray MF. Chondrosarcoma of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71(8): 1158-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971080-00006] [PMID: 2777842]
[132]
Dahlin DC, Henderson ED. Chondrosarcoma, a surgical and pathological problem; review of 212 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956; 38-A(5): 1025-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195638050-00007] [PMID: 13367080]
[133]
Boriani S, De Iure F, Bandiera S, et al. Chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine: report on 22 cases. Spine 2000; 25(7): 804-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200004010-00008] [PMID: 10751291]
[134]
Green R, Saifuddin A, Cannon S. Pictorial review: Imaging of primary osteosarcoma of the spine. Clin Radiol 1996; 51(5): 325-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80108-5] [PMID: 8641093]
[135]
Shives TC, Dahlin DC, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Earle JD. Osteosarcoma of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68(5): 660-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668050-00004] [PMID: 3459729]
[136]
Boriani S, Biagini R, De Iure F, et al. En bloc resections of bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. A preliminary report on 29 patients. Spine 1996; 21(16): 1927-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199608150-00020] [PMID: 8875727]
[137]
Hrehorovich PA, Franke HR, Maximin S, Caracta P. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Radiographics 2003; 23(3): 790-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.233025153] [PMID: 12740477]
[138]
Li C-S, Huang G-S, Wu H-D, et al. Differentiation of soft tissue benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2008; 32(2): 121-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.05.006] [PMID: 18313576]
[139]
Demehri S, Belzberg A, Blakeley J, Fayad LM. Conventional and functional MR imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35(8): 1615-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3910] [PMID: 24763412]
[140]
Combemale P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Giammarile F, et al. Utility of 18F-FDG PET with a semi-quantitative index in the detection of sarcomatous transformation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. PLoS One 2014; 9(2): e85954.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085954] [PMID: 24516522]
[141]
Aktuğ T, Hakgüder G, Sarioğlu S, Akgür FM, Olguner M, Pabuçcuoğlu U. Sacrococcygeal extraspinal ependymomas: the role of coccygectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35(3): 515-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(00)90228-8] [PMID: 10726703]
[142]
Moelleken SM, Seeger LL, Eckardt JJ, Batzdorf U. Myxopapillary ependymoma with extensive sacral destruction: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16(1): 164-6.
[PMID: 1729299]
[143]
Sun B, Wang C, Wang J, Liu A. MRI features of intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas. J Neuroimaging 2003; 13(4): 346-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00202.x] [PMID: 14569827]
[144]
Sanchez-Mejia RO, Ojemann SG, Simko J, Chaudhary UB, Levy J, Lawton MT. Sacral epithelioid angiosarcoma associated with a bleeding diathesis and spinal epidural hematoma: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4(3): 246-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.3.246] [PMID: 16572625]
[145]
Nakamura M, Tsushima K, Yasuo M, et al. Angiosarcoma with sacral origin metastasizing to the lung. Intern Med 2006; 45(15): 923-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1596] [PMID: 16946576]
[146]
Roldan-Valadez E, Piña-Jimenez C, Favila R, Rios C. Gender and age groups interactions in the quantification of bone marrow fat content in lumbar spine using 3T MR spectroscopy: a multivariate analysis of covariance (Mancova). Eur J Radiol 2013; 82(11): e697-702. Available from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048 X13003823
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.012] [PMID: 23938236]
[147]
Roldán-Valadez E, Cortez-Conradis D, Ríos-Hoyo A, Arrieta Ó. Variability of apparent diffusion coefficients in metastatic small cell lung carcinoma: comparisons between-within normal tissue and liver metastases. Ann Hepatol 2014; 13(2): 297-302.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1665-2681(19)30895-6] [PMID: 24558224]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy