Generic placeholder image

Current Drug Metabolism


ISSN (Print): 1389-2002
ISSN (Online): 1875-5453

Review Article

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Very-low Volume Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Narrative Review

Author(s): Emanuele Sinagra*, Sandro Sferrazza, Alessandro Vitello, Gaetano Morreale, Francesca Rossi, Giuseppe Conoscenti, Socrate Pallio, Dario Raimondo and Marcello Maida

Volume 22, Issue 2, 2021

Published on: 08 December, 2020

Page: [85 - 88] Pages: 4

DOI: 10.2174/1389200221999201208212007

Price: $65


An adequate bowel preparation is essential for a successful colonoscopy, in particular, in the setting of colorectal cancer screening. However, up to one-quarter of colonoscopies are associated with inadequate bowel preparation, which may result in reduced polyp and adenoma detection rates, prolonged procedural time, and an increased likelihood of repeat the procedure.

The ideal intestinal preparation should provide an optimal observation of the mucosa (at least > 90% of the visible surface), with adequate acceptability and safety for the patient.

With this premise, a very low-volume 1 L PEG-ASC solution (Plenvu; Norgine, Harefield, United Kingdom) has been recently introduced to improve patients’ experience in colonoscopy by reducing the total intake of liquids to be consumed. This could represent a valid option for bowel cleansing, considering CRC screening and surveillance programs, improving both the quality of the examination and the patients’ compliance.

Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that a “one size fits all” preparation strategy is not feasible and that a bowel preparation regime must always be selected and tailored by the clinician for each patient, evaluating the best options on a case by case basis.

This narrative review aims to sum up the evidence regarding new bowel preparation regimens in order to help clinicians to tailor the best choice for patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Keywords: NER1006, colonoscopy, colorectal cancer, low volume solution, split dose, 1 L peg-asc.

Graphical Abstract
Parekh, P.J.; Oldfield, E.C., IV; Johnson, D.A. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: What is best and necessary for quality? Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol., 2019, 35(1), 51-57.
[] [PMID: 30489414]
Kastenberg, D.; Bertiger, G.; Brogadir, S. Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol., 2018, 24(26), 2833-2843.
[] [PMID: 30018478]
Nicholson, F.B.; Korman, M.G. Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention. J. Med. Screen., 2005, 12(2), 89-95.
[] [PMID: 15949120]
Rex, D.K.; Imperiale, T.F.; Latinovich, D.R.; Bratcher, L.L. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2002, 97(7), 1696-1700.
[] [PMID: 12135020]
Froehlich, F.; Wietlisbach, V.; Gonvers, J.J.; Burnand, B.; Vader, J.P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc., 2005, 61(3), 378-384.
[] [PMID: 15758907]
Kaminski, M.F.; Regula, J.; Kraszewska, E.; Polkowski, M.; Wojciechowska, U.; Didkowska, J.; Zwierko, M.; Rupinski, M.; Nowacki, M.P.; Butruk, E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 362(19), 1795-1803.
[] [PMID: 20463339]
Johnson, DA; Barkun, AN; Cohen, LB US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology, 2014, 147(4), 903-24.
Hassan, C.; East, J.; Radaelli, F.; Spada, C.; Benamouzig, R.; Bisschops, R.; Bretthauer, M.; Dekker, E.; Dinis-Ribeiro, M.; Ferlitsch, M.; Fuccio, L.; Awadie, H.; Gralnek, I.; Jover, R.; Kaminski, M.F.; Pellisé, M.; Triantafyllou, K.; Vanella, G.; Mangas-Sanjuan, C.; Frazzoni, L.; Van Hooft, J.E.; Dumonceau, J.M. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(8), 775-794.
[] [PMID: 31295746]
Maida, M; Morreale, G; Sinagra, E. Quality measures improving endoscopic screening of colorectal cancer: a review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2019, 19(3), 223-235.
Seo, E.H.; Kim, T.O.; Park, M.J.; Joo, H.R.; Heo, N.Y.; Park, J.; Park, S.H.; Yang, S.Y.; Moon, Y.S. Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc., 2012, 75(3), 583-590.
[] [PMID: 22177570]
Rex, DK Optimal bowel preparation a practical guide for clinicians. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 11(7), 419-25.
Kilgore, T.W.; Abdinoor, A.A.; Szary, N.M.; Schowengerdt, S.W.; Yust, J.B.; Choudhary, A.; Matteson, M.L.; Puli, S.R.; Marshall, J.B.; Bechtold, M.L. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest. Endosc., 2011, 73(6), 1240-1245.
[] [PMID: 21628016]
Wu, L; Cao, Y; Liao, C; Huang, J; Gao, F Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Simethicone for gastrointestinal endoscopic visibility. Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 2011, 46(2), 227-235.
Waldmann, E.; Penz, D.; Majcher, B.; Zagata, J.; Šinkovec, H.; Heinze, G.; Dokladanska, A.; Szymanska, A.; Trauner, M.; Ferlitsch, A.; Ferlitsch, M. Impact of high-volume, intermediate-volume and low-volume bowel preparation on colonoscopy quality and patient satisfaction: An observational study. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J., 2019, 7(1), 114-124.
[] [PMID: 30788123]
Yi, L.J.; Tian, X.; Shi, B.; Chen, H.; Liu, X.L.; Pi, Y.P.; Chen, W.Q. Low-volume polyethylene glycol improved patient attendance in bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Front. Med. (Lausanne), 2019, 6, 92.
[] [PMID: 31134201]
DeMicco, M.P.; Clayton, L.B.; Pilot, J.; Epstein, M.S. NOCT Study Group. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest. Endosc., 2018, 87(3), 677-687.e3.
[] [PMID: 28803744]
Schreiber, S.; Baumgart, D.C.; Drenth, J.P.H.; Filip, R.S.; Clayton, L.B.; Hylands, K.; Repici, A.; Hassan, C. DAYB Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(1), 73-84.
[] [PMID: 30025415]
Bisschops, R.; Manning, J.; Clayton, L.B.; Ng Kwet Shing, R.; Álvarez- González, M. MORA Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy, 2019, 51(1), 60-72.
[] [PMID: 30025414]
Maida, M; Macaluso, FS; Sferrazza, S Effectiveness and safety of NER1006 versus standard bowel preparations: a meta-analysis of randomized phase-3 clinical trials. Dig Liver Dis., 2020, 52(8), 833-839.
Maida, M.; Sinagra, E.; Morreale, G.C.; Sferrazza, S.; Scalisi, G.; Schillaci, D.; Ventimiglia, M.; Macaluso, F.S.; Vettori, G.; Conoscenti, G.; Di Bartolo, C.; Garufi, S.; Catarella, D.; Manganaro, M.; Virgilio, C.M.; Camilleri, S. Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter observational study. World J. Gastroenterol., 2020, 26(16), 1950-1961.
[] [PMID: 32390705]
Fuccio, L.; Frazzoni, L.; Spada, C.; Mussetto, A.; Fabbri, C.; Manno, M.; Aragona, G.; Zagari, R.M.; Rondonotti, E.; Manes, G.; Occhipinti, P.; Cadoni, S.; Bazzoli, F.; Hassan, C.; Radaelli, F. QIPS study group. Factors that affect adequacy of colon cleansing for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 2020, S1542-3565(20)30342-6.
[] [PMID: 32200083]
Ware, J.H.; Hamel, M.B. Pragmatic trials-guides to better patient care? N. Engl. J. Med., 2011, 364(18), 1685-1687.
[] [PMID: 21542739]

Rights & Permissions Print Export Cite as
© 2022 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy