Generic placeholder image

New Emirates Medical Journal

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): -
ISSN (Online): 0250-6882

Case Report

Myocardial Infarction with Non Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Case Report

Author(s): Mousa S. A. Ghoush*, Safaa Almohdar and Thamer Samha

Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 2021

Published on: 08 September, 2020

Page: [64 - 67] Pages: 4

DOI: 10.2174/0250688201999200908145933

open access plus

Abstract

Background: Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is a syndrome with different causes, characterized by clinical evidence of myocardial infarction with normal or near-normal coronary arteries on angiography.

Case Presentation: Here we describe an interesting case of a 29 year old male known to have bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement who presented with chest pain suggestive of the acute coronary syndrome, with rising troponin levels but having a normal coronary angiography and a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showing evidence of myocardial infarction thus suggestive of MINOCA.

Conclusion: This case illustrates the increasing clinical role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in modern cardiology and its ability to detect a final diagnosis in patients with MINOCA and also raise the possibility of recurrent embolic phenomena to the epicardial vessels from bioprosthetic valves, which might be challenging to prove.

Keywords: CMR, Cardiac MRI, MINOCA, Myocardial infarction with spontaneous recanalization, Myocardial oedema, Myocardial infarction.

[1]
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60(16): 1581-98.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001] [PMID: 22958960]
[2]
Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. Acc/aha guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on coronary angiography). Developed in collaboration with the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(6): 1756-824.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00126-6] [PMID: 10334456]
[3]
Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP, Tavella R, Beltrame JF. Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation 2015; 131(10): 861-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011201] [PMID: 25587100]
[4]
Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J 2017; 38(33): 2565-8.
[PMID: 26245334]
[5]
Ghosh Dastidar A, Jonathan CL. Rodrigues, Baritussio A, Bucciarelli-Ducci C. . MRI in the assessment of ischaemic heart disesase. Heart 2016; 102(3): 239-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306963] [PMID: 26719357]
[6]
Frishman WH. Calcium channel blockers: Differences between subclasses. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2007; 7(Suppl. 1): 17-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00129784-200707001-00003] [PMID: 19845073]
[7]
Lanza GA, Maseri A. Coronary Artery Spasm. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2000; 2(1): 83-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11936-000-0031-0] [PMID: 11096513]

© 2022 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy