Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Ascites: The Role of Fluid Attenuation Values

Author(s): Paul-Andrei Ştefan, Andrei Lebovici*, Csaba Csutak and Carmen Mihaela Mihu

Volume 17, Issue 3, 2021

Published on: 22 July, 2020

Page: [390 - 395] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200722152105

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Intraperitoneal fluid accumulations are a common matter in current clinical practice, being encountered by most medical and surgical fields.

Objective: To assess ascites fluid with attenuation values in the form of Hounsfield units (HU) in order to determine a non-invasive differentiation criterion for the diagnosis of intraperitoneal collections.

Methods: Sixty patients with known intra-peritoneal collections who underwent computed tomography (CT) for reasons such as tumor staging, post-surgical follow-up or other indications, were retrospectively included in this study. All subjects had a final pathological analysis of the fluid collections. Two radiologists measured the attenuation values for each collection. The averaged values were used for comparing benign and malignancy-related ascites (MRA), bland and hemorrhagic ascites and infected and noninfected fluid collections by consuming the Mann–Whitney U test. Also, the receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the statistically significant results (P<0.05), and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results: Attenuation values could differentiate between benign and MRA (P=0.04; AUC=0.656; sensitivity, 65.52%; specificity, 71.43%) but failed to distinguish between bland ascites and ascites with hemorrhagic component (P=0.85), and between infected and noninfected fluid collections (P=0.47).

Conclusion: Although the results are statistically significant, the substrate of differentiation between benign and MRA ascites cannot be clearly stated. As being the first study to investigate this issue, it opens the way for other researches in the field to determine the dynamics of imaging quantitative measurements according to the fluid’s pathological features.

Keywords: Ascites, attenuation values, computed tomography, intra-peritoneal collection, hounsfield units, peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Smereczyński A, Kołaczyk K, Bernatowicz E. Difficulties in differentiating the nature of ascites based on ultrasound imaging. J Ultrason 2017; 17(69): 96-100.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2017.0013] [PMID: 28856016]
[2]
Funicelli L, Travaini LL, Landoni F, Trifirò G, Bonello L, Bellomi M. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: the role of CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35(6): 701-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9578-8] [PMID: 19784697]
[3]
Marin D, Catalano C, Baski M, et al. 64-Section multi-detector row CT in the preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis: correlation with histopathological findings. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35(6): 694-700.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9464-9] [PMID: 19455272]
[4]
Huang L-L, Xia HH-X, Zhu S-L. Ascitic fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of ascites: focus on cirrhotic acites. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2014; 2(1): 58-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2013.00010] [PMID: 26357618]
[5]
Hounsfield GN. Computed medical imaging. Nobel lecture, Decemberr 8, 1979. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980; 4(5): 665-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198010000-00017] [PMID: 6997341]
[6]
Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO, Lamba R, Wilson M, McGahan JP. Differentiation of ovarian endometriomas from hemorrhagic cysts at MR imaging: utility of the T2 dark spot sign. Radiology 2014; 271(1): 126-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131394] [PMID: 24475842]
[7]
Seishima R, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, et al. Computed tomography attenuation values of ascites are helpful to predict perforation site. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(5): 1573-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1573] [PMID: 25663776]
[8]
Nandalur KR, Hardie AH, Bollampally SR, Parmar JP, Hagspiel KD. Accuracy of computed tomography attenuation values in the characterization of pleural fluid: an ROC study. Acad Radiol 2005; 12(8): 987-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.002] [PMID: 16087093]
[9]
Allen BC, Barnhart H, Bashir M, Nieman C, Breault S, Jaffe TA. Diagnostic accuracy of intra-abdominal fluid collection characterization in the era of multidetector computed tomography. Am Surg 2012; 78(2): 185-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000313481207800236] [PMID: 22369827]
[10]
Sahni A, Mazumder S, Tangorra M, Abdullah M. Ascitic fluid density measured by hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) scan as a predictor of total protein and albumin content of the ascitic fluid: 216. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: S93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200509001-00216]
[11]
Khaladkar SM, Gujarath A, Thakkar D, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign ascites by Ultrasonography and / or CT. Int J Healthcare & Biomed Res 2015; 3: 102-16.
[12]
Sangisetty SL, Miner TJ. Malignant ascites: A review of prognostic factors, pathophysiology and therapeutic measures. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4(4): 87-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i4.87] [PMID: 22590662]
[13]
Approach to the Patient with Ascites - OpenThink Labs - Research and Development Division of Negeri Pelangi - a Pay it Forward Community nd http://wiki.openthinklabs.com/ science-corner/kesehatan/penyakit-perut/ascites /research-paper/approach-to-the-patient-with-ascites [November 30, 2019];
[14]
Gnannt R, Fischer MA, Baechler T, et al. Distinguishing infected from noninfected abdominal fluid collections after surgery: an imaging, clinical, and laboratory-based scoring system. Invest Radiol 2015; 50(1): 17-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000090] [PMID: 25198832]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy