Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Diabetes Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3998
ISSN (Online): 1875-6417

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Review Article

Quality Evaluation of English Mobile Applications for Gestational Diabetes: App Review using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)

Author(s): Sharareh R. Niakan Kalhori, Morteza Hemmat, Tayebe Noori, Saeede Heydarian and Meysam Rahmani Katigari*

Volume 17, Issue 2, 2021

Published on: 03 July, 2020

Page: [161 - 168] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1573399816666200703181438

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Mobile applications and social media serve their users as convenient tools to improve and monitor diseases and conditions such as pregnancy. These tools also exert a positive impact on Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) self-management.

Introduction: Despite the expansion of mobile health apps for the management of GDM, no study has evaluated these apps using a valid tool. This study aimed to search and review the apps developed for this purpose, providing overall and specific rating scores for each aspect of MARS.

Methods: Two cases of app stores (IOS and Google Play) were searched in January 2019 for apps related to GDM. Search keywords included “gestational diabetes”, “pregnant diabetes”, and “Health apps”. Eligibility criteria include: capable of running on Android or IOS operating systems, in the English language, especially for GDM, and available in Iran. After removal of duplicates, the apps were reviewed, rated, and evaluated independently by two reviewers with Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) tools.

Results: Initially, 102 apps were identified after the exclusion process, five selected apps were downloaded and analyzed. All apps were classified into four categories according to contents and their interactive capabilities. In most quadrants of MARS, the Pregnant with Diabetes app received the highest scores. Also, in general, the maximum app quality mean score belonged to Pregnant with Diabetes (3.10 / 5.00).

Conclusion: Findings revealed that apps designed for GDM are small in number and poor in quality based on MARS tools. Therefore, considering pregnant women’s need for using the capabilities of these apps in pregnancy management and promoting community-based care, it seems essential to develop and design a series of high-quality apps in all four specified categories (only giving comments, obtaining data and giving comments, diagnosis of GDM, and diet calculator).

Keywords: Telemedicine, diabetes, gestational pregnancy, mobile applications, evaluation study, medical informatics.

[1]
Fernandes SJ, Kamath P. Knowledge, Attitude and Risk Perception for diabetes among Pregnant Women with gestational diabetes Mellitus. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2018; 9(2): 19.
[2]
Baz B, Riveline J-P, Gautier J-F. Endocrinology of pregnancy: Gestational diabetes mellitus: definition, aetiological and clinical aspects. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 174(2): R43-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0378] [PMID: 26431552]
[3]
Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS. Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(24): 2477-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042973] [PMID: 15951574]
[4]
Guariguata L, Linnenkamp U, Beagley J, Whiting DR, Cho NH. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 103(2): 176-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.003] [PMID: 24300020]
[5]
Reece EA, Leguizamón G, Wiznitzer A. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet 2009; 373(9677): 1789-97.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60515-8] [PMID: 19465234]
[6]
Murphy HR, Rayman G, Lewis K, et al. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2008; 337: a1680.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1680] [PMID: 18818254]
[7]
Chen Q, Carbone ET. Functionality, implementation, impact, and the role of health literacy in mobile phone apps for gestational diabetes: scoping review. JMIR diabetes 2017; 2(2): e25
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/diabetes.8045]
[8]
Smith A, Page D. The smartphone difference. Pew Research Center 2015; 53: 1689-99.
[9]
Carissoli C, Villani D, Riva G. An emerging model of pregnancy care: The introduction of new technologies in maternal wellbeing Integrating technology in positive psychology practice. IGI Global 2016; pp. 162-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9986-1.ch007]
[10]
Lupton D, Pedersen S. An Australian survey of women’s use of pregnancy and parenting apps. Women Birth 2016; 29(4): 368-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.008] [PMID: 26874938]
[11]
Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med 2013; 10(1)e1001362
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362] [PMID: 23349621]
[12]
Årsand E, Frøisland DH, Skrøvseth SO, et al. Mobile health applications to assist patients with diabetes: lessons learned and design implications. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012; 6(5): 1197-206.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193229681200600525] [PMID: 23063047]
[13]
Goyal S, Morita P, Lewis GF, Yu C, Seto E, Cafazzo JA. The systematic design of a behavioural mobile health application for the self-management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2016; 40(1): 95-104.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.06.007] [PMID: 26455762]
[14]
Guo H, Zhang Y, Li P, Zhou P, Chen L-M, Li S-Y. Evaluating the effects of mobile health intervention on weight management, glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Endocrinol Invest 2019; 42(6): 709-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0975-0] [PMID: 30406378]
[15]
Halili L, Liu R, Hutchinson KA, Semeniuk K, Redman LM, Adamo KB. Development and pilot evaluation of a pregnancy-specific mobile health tool: a qualitative investigation of SmartMoms Canada. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18(1): 95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0705-8] [PMID: 30419896]
[16]
Skar JB, Garnweidner-Holme LM, Lukasse M, Terragni L. Women’s experiences with using a smartphone app (the Pregnant+ app) to manage gestational diabetes mellitus in a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 2018; 58: 102-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.021] [PMID: 29329023]
[17]
Grainger R, Townsley H, White B, Langlotz T, Taylor WJ. Apps for people with rheumatoid arthritis to monitor their disease activity: a review of apps for best practice and quality. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5(2)e7
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6956] [PMID: 28223263]
[18]
Subhi Y, Bube SH, Rolskov Bojsen S, Skou Thomsen AS, Konge L. Expert involvement and adherence to medical evidence in medical mobile phone apps: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3(3)e79
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4169] [PMID: 26215371]
[19]
Huckvale K, Prieto JT, Tilney M, Benghozi P-J, Car J. Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med 2015; 13(1): 214.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y] [PMID: 26404673]
[20]
Rodrigues P, Silva IS, Ang V, et al. Beyond the Stars: Towards a Novel Sentiment Rating to Evaluate Applications in Web Stores of Mobile Apps. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. Perth, Australia. 2017; pp. 109-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054139]
[21]
Hoppe CD, Cade JE, Carter M. An evaluation of diabetes targeted apps for Android smartphone in relation to behaviour change techniques. J Hum Nutr Diet 2017; 30(3): 326-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12424] [PMID: 27747955]
[22]
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3(1)e27
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422] [PMID: 25760773]
[23]
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016; 4(2)e72
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5849] [PMID: 27287964]
[24]
Baumel A, Muench F. Heuristic evaluation of Ehealth interventions: Establishing standards that relate to the therapeutic process perspective. JMIR Ment Health 2016; 3(1 e5)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.4563] [PMID: 26764209]
[25]
Hingle M, Patrick H. There are thousands of apps for that: navigating mobile technology for nutrition education and behavior. J Nutr Educ Behav 2016; 48(3): 213-8.
[26]
Kenny R, Dooley B, Fitzgerald A. Feasibility of” CopeSmart”: a telemental health app for adolescents. JMIR Ment Health 2015; 2(3)e22
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.4370] [PMID: 26552425]
[27]
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15(2): 155-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012] [PMID: 27330520]
[28]
Tassone C, Keshavjee K, Paglialonga A, Moreira N, Pinto J, Quintana Y. Evaluation of mobile apps for treatment of patients at risk of developing gestational diabetes. Health Inform J. 2020; p. 1460458219896639.
[29]
Pustozerov E, Popova P, Tkachuk A, Bolotko Y, Yuldashev Z, Grineva E. Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Personalized Blood Glucose Prediction System for Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6(1 e6)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9236] [PMID: 29317385]
[30]
Jovicic S, Siodmiak J, Watson I. Quality evaluation of smartphone applications for laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019; 57(3): 388-97.
[PMID: 30496130]
[31]
Kim BY, Sharafoddini A, Tran N, Wen EY, Lee J. Consumer mobile apps for potential drug-drug interaction check: systematic review and content analysis using the mobile app rating scale (MARS). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6(3)e74
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8613] [PMID: 29592848]
[32]
Boudreaux ED, Waring ME, Hayes RB, Sadasivam RS, Mullen S, Pagoto S. Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Transl Behav Med 2014; 4(4): 363-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0293-9] [PMID: 25584085]
[33]
Nikolopoulos M, Karampela I, Antonakos G, Tzortzis E, Stratigou T, Diomidous M, et al. Mobile Phone Applications for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Appraisal and Perspectives 2019. InICIMTH 2019; 39-42.
[34]
Hartmann J, Sutcliffe A, Angeli AD. Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Trans Comput Hum 2008; 15(4): 15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357]
[35]
Lindgaard G, Dudek C, Sen D, Sumegi L, Noonan P. An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Trans Comput Hum 2011; 18(1): 1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1959022.1959023]
[36]
Lee J, Dallery J, Laracuente A, Ibe I, Joseph S, Huo J, et al. A content analysis of free smoking cessation mobile applications in the USA. J Smok Cessat 2019; 14(4): 195-202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2019.6]
[37]
Nguyen AD, Baysari MT, Kannangara DR, et al. Mobile applications to enhance self-management of gout. Int J Med Inform 2016; 94: 67-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.021] [PMID: 27573313]
[38]
Singh K, Drouin K, Newmark LP, et al. Developing a Framework for Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality, and Safety of Mobile Health Applications. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2016; 5(1): 1-11.
[PMID: 26934758]
[39]
Sonderegger A, Sauer J. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl Ergon 2010; 41(3): 403-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002] [PMID: 19892317]
[40]
Con D, De Cruz P. Mobile phone apps for inflammatory bowel disease self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016; 4(1)e13
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4874] [PMID: 26831935]
[41]
Abroms LC, Padmanabhan N, Thaweethai L, Phillips T. iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. Am J Prev Med 2011; 40(3): 279-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.032] [PMID: 21335258]
[42]
Huckvale K, Car M, Morrison C, Car J. Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools. BMC Med 2012; 10(1): 144.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-144] [PMID: 23171675]
[43]
Nicholas J, Larsen ME, Proudfoot J, Christensen H. Mobile apps for bipolar disorder: a systematic review of features and content quality. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17(8)e198
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4581] [PMID: 26283290]
[44]
Mani M, Kavanagh DJ, Hides L, Stoyanov SR. Review and evaluation of mindfulness-based iPhone apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3(3)e82
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328] [PMID: 26290327]
[45]
Bardus M, van Beurden SB, Smith JR, Abraham C. A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2016; 13(1): 35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0359-9] [PMID: 26964880]
[46]
Grundy QH, Wang Z, Bero LA. Challenges in assessing mobile health app quality: a systematic review of prevalent and innovative methods. Am J Prev Med 2016; 51(6): 1051-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.009] [PMID: 27659122]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
57
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy