Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Evaluation of Mandibular Third Molar Region in a Turkish Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Author(s): Büyük Kaan Orhan, Dilek Yılmaz, Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre*, Kıvanç Kamburoğlu, Orhan Gulen and Ayse Gulsahi

Volume 16, Issue 9, 2020

Page: [1105 - 1110] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200103094611

Price: $65

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate impacted mandibular third molar tooth region and obtain linear measurements using CBCT images and to assess the relationship between the impacted third molar and the mandibular canal.

Methods: CBCT scans of 351 patients (208 females, 143 males) were assessed. Age, gender, and impaction site were recorded for each patient. The relationship of third molars with the vertical axis of second molars, 2nd molar resorption and the relationship between third molar apices and the mandibular canal were assessed. In addition, the distance between ramus and second molar, mesiodistal width of the third molar, the angle between third molar and second molar, and width of the third molar capsule were measured. Binary Logistic Regression, Chi-Square Test, and General Linear Model were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The highest percentage of impaction was found for mesioangular followed by transversal and vertical. The transversal impacted third molars revealed a significant association with adjacent second molar root resorption (p<0.001). There was a statistical significance between the second molar resorption and distance between ramus and second molar (p<0.001). The mesioangular impacted third molars revealed significant relation with the mandibular canal (p<0.05). The most frequent variation found was the dental canal followed by the retromolar canal. In general, higher measurement values were obtained for men when compared to women (p<0.05).

Conclusion: CBCT assessment of the third molar region provided useful information regarding impacted mandibular third molar surgery operations.

Keywords: İmpacted third molar, cone beam computed tomography, classification, measurement, patients, mandibular canal.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64(7): 1030-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.020] [PMID: 16781335]
[2]
Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(2): 253-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.060] [PMID: 17234544]
[3]
Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Heinrich S, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3): 412-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.008] [PMID: 17321455]
[4]
Matzen LH, Petersen LB, Wenzel A. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45(4)20150226
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150226] [PMID: 26943178]
[5]
Matzen LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: A review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(1)20140189
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140189] [PMID: 25135317]
[6]
Guerrero ME, Nackaerts O, Beinsberger J, Horner K, Schoenaers J, Jacobs R. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: A pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70(10): 2264-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.04.015] [PMID: 22705219]
[7]
Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, et al. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40(8): 834-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.032] [PMID: 21507612]
[8]
Öhman A, Kivijärvi K, Blombäck U, Flygare L. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35(1): 30-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/58068337] [PMID: 16421261]
[9]
Bishara SE, Andreasen G. Third molars: A review. Am J Orthod 1983; 83(2): 131-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(83)90298-1] [PMID: 6572040]
[10]
Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig 1933; 39: 330-8.
[11]
Gbotolorun OM, Olojede AC, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL, Akinwande JA, Bamgbose BO. Impacted mandibular third molars: Presentation and postoperative complications at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2007; 17(1): 26-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/nqjhm.v17i1.12537] [PMID: 17688169]
[12]
Chuang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for inflammatory complications following third molar surgery in adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66(11): 2213-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.067] [PMID: 18940482]
[13]
Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery-a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67(4): 771-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010] [PMID: 19304033]
[14]
Oenning AC, Neves FS, Alencar PN, Prado RF, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72(8): 1444-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.023] [PMID: 24856956]
[15]
Xu GZ, Yang C, Fan XD, et al. Anatomic relationship between impacted third mandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the risk factor of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51(8): e215-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.011] [PMID: 23411471]
[16]
Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: Literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34(1): 55-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/23146121] [PMID: 15709108]
[17]
DeSantis JL, Liebow C. Four common mandibular nerve anomalies that lead to local anesthesia failures. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127(7): 1081-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0333] [PMID: 8754466]
[18]
Rashsuren O, Choi JW, Han WJ, Kim EK. Assessment of bifid and trifid mandibular canals using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44(3): 229-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.229] [PMID: 25279344]
[19]
Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, Khanal A, et al. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68(12): 3022-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.046] [PMID: 20739116]
[20]
Motamedi MH, Gharedaghi J, Mehralizadeh S, et al. Anthropomorphic assessment of the retromolar foramen and retromolar nerve: Anomaly or variation of normal anatomy? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45(2): 241-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.017] [PMID: 26586301]
[21]
Kamburoğlu K, Murat S, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Yüksel S, Paksoy C. Comparative assessment of subjective image quality of cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Sci 2011; 53(4): 501-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.501] [PMID: 22167037]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
34
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy