The Effectiveness of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Determining Radiological Response after Radiosurgery in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

Author(s): Dilek Hacer Cesme*, Alpay Alkan, Lutfullah Sari, Ahmet Kaya, Ismail Yurtsever, Gokberk Alkan, Mehmet Hakan Seyithanoglu, Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu

Journal Name: Current Medical Imaging
Formerly: Current Medical Imaging Reviews

Volume 17 , Issue 5 , 2021

Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Background: The effectiveness of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) in demonstrating functional changes in the tumor in determining the response to treatment after radiosurgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is not clear yet.

Objective: The study aimed to determine the change in total tumor volume (TTV) in terms of radiological response in patients who had VS and were treated with radiosurgery and investigated the relationship between the TTV, follow-up times and DTI parameters.

Methods: Thirty-one patients were assessed using DTI and MRI. TTV, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA) were calculated. Patients were divided into three groups: those who responded to the treatment (group 1) (n=11), those who did not (group 0) (n=9) and those who remained stable (group 2) (n=11).

Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 28.81±14 months. ADC values increased in patients with VS after radiosurgery (p=0.004). There was no statistical difference in the FA values. A significant reduction in TTV after radiosurgery was detected in group 1 (p=0.003). ADC values increased significantly after radiosurgery in group 2 (p=0.04). Although there were no significant differences, ADC values after radiosurgery increased in group 1 and group 0.

Conclusions: ADC values continuously increase due to radiation damage in the period before the tumor volume shrinks after radiosurgery. We think that it is not appropriate to diagnose inadequate treatment or progression only when TTV is evaluated in terms of response to treatment in the early period after radiosurgery.

Keywords: Radiosurgery, gamma knife radiosurgery, vestibular schwannomas, tumor volume, diffusion tensor imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient.

Buss EJ, Wang TJC, Sisti MB. Stereotactic radiosurgery for management of vestibular schwannoma: a short review. Neurosurg Rev 2020.
[] [PMID: 32170501]
Langenhuizen PPJH, Sebregts SHP, Zinger S, Leenstra S, Verheul JB, de With PHN. Prediction of transient tumor enlargement using MRI tumor texture after radiosurgery on vestibular schwannoma. Med Phys 2020; 47(4): 1692-701.
[] [PMID: 31975523]
Morselli C, Boari N, Artico M, et al. The emerging role of hearing loss rehabilitation in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44(1): 223-38.
[] [PMID: 32030543]
Camargo A, Schneider T, Liu L, Pakpoor J, Kleinberg L, Yousem DM. Pretreatment ADC values predict response to radiosurgery in vestibular schwannomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38(6): 1200-5.
[] [PMID: 28408629]
Udawatta M, Kwan I, Preet K, et al. Hearing preservation for vestibular schwannomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. World Neurosurg 2019; 129: e303-10.
[] [PMID: 31132496]
Schneider T, Chapiro J, Lin M, et al. 3D quantitative assessment of response to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and single-session stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma. Eur Radiol 2016; 26(3): 849-57.
[] [PMID: 26139318]
Fu VX, Verheul JB, Beute GN, et al. Retreatment of vestibular schwannoma with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: clinical outcome, tumor control, and review of literature. J Neurosurg 2018; 129(1): 137-45.
[] [PMID: 28984523]
Chagas Saraiva CW, Cardoso SC, Groppo DP, De Salles AAF, de Ávila LF, Ribeiro da Rosa LA. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Evaluation of planning using the sphericity degree of the target volume. PLoS One 2020; 15(1): e0225638.
Thomas C, Di Maio S, Ma R, et al. Hearing preservation following fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: prognostic implications of cochlear dose. J Neurosurg 2007; 107(5): 917-26.
[] [PMID: 17977261]
Boari N, Bailo M, Gagliardi F, et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: clinical results at long-term follow-up in a series of 379 patients. J Neurosurg 2014; 121(Suppl.): 123-42.
[] [PMID: 25434946]
Persson O, Bartek J Jr, Shalom NB, Wangerid T, Jakola AS, Förander P. Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159(6): 1013-21.
[] [PMID: 28409393]
Lin YC, Wang CC, Wai YY, et al. Significant temporal evolution of diffusion anisotropy for evaluating early response to radiosurgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma: findings from functional diffusion maps. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31(2): 269-74.
[] [PMID: 19779002]
Régis J, Delsanti C, Roche PH. Editorial: Vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery: progression or pseudoprogression? J Neurosurg 2017; 127(2): 374-9.
[] [PMID: 27885955]
Marston AP, Jacob JT, Carlson ML, Pollock BE, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Pretreatment growth rate as a predictor of tumor control following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2017; 127(2): 380-7.
[] [PMID: 27885952]
Windisch PY, Tonn JC, Fürweger C, et al. Clinical results after single-fraction rdiosurgery for 1,002 vestibular schwannomas. Cureus 2019; 11(12): e6390.
Plotkin SR, Halpin C, Blakeley JO, et al. Suggested response criteria for phase II antitumor drug studies for neurofibromatosis type 2 related vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol 2009; 93(1): 61-77.
[] [PMID: 19430883]
van de Langenberg R, Dohmen AJ, de Bondt BJ, Nelemans PJ, Baumert BG, Stokroos RJ. Volume changes after stereotactic LINAC radiotherapy in vestibular schwannoma: control rate and growth patterns. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84(2): 343-9.
[] [PMID: 22361083]
Lin Y, Wang J, Wu C, Wai Y, Yu J, Ng S. Diffusion tensor imaging of the auditory pathway in sensorineural hearing loss: changes in radial diffusivity and diffusion anisotropy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28(3): 598-603.
[] [PMID: 18777540]
Chuang CC, Chang CS, Tyan YS, Chuang KS, Tu HT, Huang CF. Use of apparent diffusion coefficients in evaluating the response of vestibular schwannomas to Gamma Knife surgery. J Neurosurg 2012; 117(Suppl.): 63-8.
[] [PMID: 23205791]
Park CK, Kim DC, Park SH, et al. Microhemorrhage, a possible mechanism for cyst formation in vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2006; 105(4): 576-80.
[] [PMID: 17044561]
Nasi D, Zunarelli E, Puzzolante A, Moriconi E, Pavesi G. Early life-threating enlargement of a vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162(8): 1977-82.
[] [PMID: 32504117]
Matsuo T, Okunaga T, Kamada K, Izumo T, Hayashi N, Nagata I. Long-term follow-up results of linear accelerator-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma using serial three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MRI. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22(2): 320-5.
[] [PMID: 25443082]
Huo M, Foley H, Pinkham M, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for large vestibular schwannomas: Volume change following single fraction versus hypofractionated approaches. J Radiosurg SBRT 2020; 7(1): 11-7.
[PMID: 32802574]
Roche PH, Noudel R, Régis J. Management of radiation/radiosurgical complications and failures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45(2): 367-374, ix.
[] [PMID: 22483822]
Hayhurst C, Zadeh G. Tumor pseudoprogression following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neuro-oncol 2012; 14(1): 87-92.
[] [PMID: 22028389]
Meijer OW, Weijmans EJ, Knol DL, et al. Tumor-volume changes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: implications for follow-up MR imaging protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29(5): 906-10.
[] [PMID: 18296549]

open access plus

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2021
Published on: 27 January, 2021
Page: [602 - 607]
Pages: 6
DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210127160848

Article Metrics

PDF: 29