Comparative Assessment of Antibacterial Efficacy of Commercially Available Different Dental Gels: An In-vitro Study

Author(s): Minal M. Kshirsagar*, Arun S. Dodamani, Prashanth Vishwakarma, Gaurao Mali, Vrushali Ramdas Khobragade, Rahul Nivrutti Deokar

Journal Name: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Volume 16 , Issue 2 , 2021


Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: The topical routes of administering drugs have certain visible advantages, such as the direct application of a drug to the site of action and persistence of action for a prolonged duration. More stability and better application property of gel allow its use for topical application.

Objectives: To determine and compare antibacterial efficacy of commercially available different dental gels.

Methods: For the evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of commercially available different antiseptic gels on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus, well-diffusion method was used. To assess the antibacterial efficacy after incubation in an appropriate culture medium, diameter of zone of inhibition was measured.

Results: Maximum zone of inhibition was found with Cure next gel (40 mm,40mm) followed by Hexigel (30 mm, 21mm), Mucopain (17 mm, 17mm), and Dologel (7 mm, 16mm) against S. mutans and L. acidophilus, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Post Hoc Test were used to analyze results statistically. The difference between commercially available different dental gels was statistically significant (P < 0.001) at a 5%.

Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that Curenext gel was more effective, followed by Hexigel, Mucopain gel, and Dologel on S. Mutans and L. Acidophilus.

Keywords: Antibacterial, hexigel, lactobacillus acidophilus, streptococcus mutans, dental gels, in-vitro study.

[1]
Dodamani AS, Kshirsagar MM, Karibasappa GN, Prashanth VK, Dodamani GA, Jadhav HC. Comparative assessment of antibacterial efficacy of aqueous extract of commercially available black, green, and lemon tea: an in vitro study. IJHS 2017; 11(4): 1-5.[PMID: 29085259]
[2]
Varoni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol 2012; 61(9): 399-419.[PMID: 22976567]
[3]
Sajjan P, Laxminarayan N, Kar PP. Mangala sajjanar. Chlorhexidine as an Antimicrobial Agent in Dentistry – A Review. OHDM 2016; 15(2): 93-100.
[4]
Tugce TUNAC Ayse, ATES Mustafa, Hakan SEN Bilge . Esra UZER CELIK. Antimicrobial activity of different disinfectants against cariogenic microorganisms. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30(1): 1-6.
[5]
Anitha M, Monisha DM, Ramya K, Chinmayee Y, Mohamed Sulthan A. A study on the occurrence of bacterial isolation in mouth ulcer patients. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 2016; 3(10): 188-92.[http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijarbs.2016.03.10.025]
[6]
Sharma B, Singh LR. Pharmaceutical gels for topical drug delivery: An overview. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2018; 3(2): 19-24.
[7]
Kshirsagar MM, Dodamani AS, Karibasappa GN, et al. Antibacterial activity of garlic extract on cariogenic bacteria: An in vitro study. Ayu 2018; 39(3): 165-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ayu.AYU_193_16] [PMID: 31000994]
[8]
Sureshchandra B. Antibacterial efficacy of five different indian varieties of grape extracs against two antimicrobial resistant starins in endodontics An in vitro study https://www.google.co.in2019.
[9]
Bou-Chacra NA, Gobi SS, Ohara MT, Terezinha de Jesus AP. Antimicrobial activity of four different dental gel formulas on cariogenic bacteria evaluated using the linear regression method. Braz J Pharm Sci 2005; 41(3): 323-31.
[10]
Nagpal M, Sood S. Role of curcumin in systemic and oral health: An overview. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013; 4(1): 3-7.[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.107253] [PMID: 23633828]
[11]
Jitesh S. Kuwatada, Mitali Raja, Poonam Sood. Turmeric: A Boon to Oral Health. Int J Oral Care Res 2017; 5(4): 338-41.[http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10051-0128]
[12]
Nilofer Farjana H, Chandrasekaran SC. Bagavad Gita. Effect of Oral Curcuma Gel in Gingivitis Management - A Pilot Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8(12): 8-10.
[13]
Anuradha BR, Bai YD, Sailaja S, Sudhakar J, Priyanka M, Deepika V. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Curcumin Gel as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing: A Clinical Study. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7(7): 90-3.[PMID: 26229378]
[14]
Kumar H. An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of Curcuma longa, Tachyspermum ammi, chlorhexidine gluconate, and calcium hydroxide on Enterococcus faecalis. J Conserv Dent 2013; 16(2): 144-7.[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.108197] [PMID: 23716967]
[15]
Jaswal R, Dhawan S, Grover V, Malhotra R. Comparative evaluation of single application of 2% whole turmeric gel versus 1% chlorhexidine gel in chronic periodontitis patients: A pilot study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014; 18(5): 575-80.[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.142445] [PMID: 25425818]
[16]
Sari E, Birinci I. Microbiological evaluation of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouth rinse in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(5): 881-4.[http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/080506-320.1] [PMID: 17685773]
[17]
Sumalee WANNACHAIYASIT, Thawatchai PHAECHAMUD. Development of Chlorhexidine Thermosensitive Gels as a Mouth Antiseptic. Development of Chlorhexidine Thermosensitive Gels as a Mouth Antiseptic 2010; 20(3): 165-8.
[18]
Frederico Silva de Freitas Fernandes, Rubenice Amaral da Silva, Juliana de Kássia Braga Fernandes, Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo, Soraia de Fátima Carvalho Souza, Marcelo Vieira Jansen. Effect of Chlorhexidine Gel in Mentally Handicapped Children highly Infected with Streptococcus Mutans. Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic 2015; 15(1): 49-55.
[19]
Mohammadi Z. Chlorhexidine gluconate, its properties and applications in endodontics. Iran Endod J 2008; 2(4): 113-25.[PMID: 24265633]
[20]
Kloster AP, Lourenço Neto N, Costa SAD, Oliveira TM, Oliveira RC, Machado MAAM. in vitro Antimicrobial Effect of Bioadhesive Oral Membrane with Chlorhexidine Gel. Braz Dent J 2018; 29(4): 354-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801743] [PMID: 30462761]
[21]
Maha M, Yahya , Maan MNayif, A.Taqa Amer . An in-Vitro Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Experimental Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution Using Agar Diffusion Test. Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences 2013; 1: 94-100.
[22]
Horner C, Mawer D, Wilcox M. Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine in staphylococci: is it increasing and does it matter? J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67(11): 2547-59.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks284] [PMID: 22833635]
[23]
Jelvehgaria M, Rashidi b Mohammad-Reza , Samadi Hedayte. Mucoadhesive and Drug Release Properties of Benzocaine Gel. Indian J Pharm Sci 2006; 2(4): 185-94.
[24]
Hersh EV, Ciancio SG, Kuperstein AS, et al. An evaluation of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels in patients with acute toothaches: efficacy, tolerability and compliance with label dose administration directions. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144(5): 517-26.[http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0154] [PMID: 23633700]
[25]
Wróblewska B. Choline Salicylate Analysis: Chemical Stability and Degradation Product Identification Katarzyna. Molecules 2020; 25(51): 1-17.
[26]
Magee P. A worldwide yearly survey of new data in adverse drug reactions and interactions. SEDA 2012; 10 : 225 .


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 16
ISSUE: 2
Year: 2021
Published on: 04 November, 2020
Page: [206 - 211]
Pages: 6
DOI: 10.2174/1574887115666201104155458
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 46
HTML: 1