Zinc Phosphate and Resin Cements Provide Similar Bonding of Cast Metal Post to Dentin

Author(s): Carolina J. Ferreira, Paula Benetti*, Karen Nicolodi, Larissa S. da Rocha, João P. De Carli

Journal Name: Current Dentistry

Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 2020


Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Cast metal posts-and-core are frequently used to retain restorations to extensively destroyed teeth. However, the influence of different cements on the posts bond strength to dentin remains unclear. Objective: to evaluate the effect of different cements on the bond strength of cast metal posts and dentin.

Methods: Forty roots (14 mm length) of extracted human teeth were endodontically treated and prepared. Impressions of each root canal were taken to obtain customized cast metal posts. The roots were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10): (1) ZP: zinc phosphate cement (non adhesive); (2) ARC_Sin: Single Bond adhesive and RelyX ARC; (3) ARC_Sco: Scotchbond adhesive and RelyX ARC; (4) U200: RelyX U200. After cementation, the samples were cross-sectioned to obtain specimens of 1mm thickness. Push-out test was performed applying a compressive load (0.5 mm/min) to the center of the metal post until failure. Bond strength was calculated based on the diameter of the root canal and the thickness of each specimen. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey (α=0.05). The fracture mode was analyzed.

Results: Bond strength values were statistically similar between the groups (p>0.05). The fracture analysis showed the prevalence of mixed fractures (cement partially attached to the dentin and/or post). Experimental groups showed inexpressive amount of adhesive fractures (complete detachment of the cement from dentin and/or post). The ARC_Sco and U200 groups presented higher prevalence of dentin cohesive fracture.

Conclusion: bonding had no influence on the immediate bond strength between cast metal posts and root canal dentin.

Keywords: Cast post and core, resin composite cements, dentine, push-out bond strength, dental cements, prosthodontics.

[1]
Sorensen JA. Preservation of tooth structure. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988; 16(11): 15-22.
[PMID: 2478673]
[2]
Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H, Sharma V, Bhasin SS. The effect of ferrule presence and type of dowel on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with metal-ceramic crowns. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17(2): 183-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.128053 ] [PMID: 24778519]
[3]
Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113(6): 519-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00257.x ] [PMID: 16324143]
[4]
Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study. J Dent 2005; 33(4): 305-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.005 ] [PMID: 15781138]
[5]
Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 2009; 35(11): 1477-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.026 ] [PMID: 19840634]
[6]
Carlini B Jr, Cecchin D, Pereira GD, Paulillo LA. Influence of remaining coronal structure and finish line on the fracture strength of roots restored with metallic posts. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25(4): 345-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000400011 ] [PMID: 21860923]
[7]
Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I. Controlled Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Glass Fiber Composite Cores Versus Wrought Posts and Cast Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A 5-Year Follow-up Study. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30(1): 71-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4861 ] [PMID: 28085986]
[8]
de Moraes AP, Poletto Neto V, Boscato N, Pereira-Cenci T. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of impression technique on the fabrication of cast metal posts. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116(1): 47-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.022 ] [PMID: 26868965]
[9]
Ferrari M, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Goracci C, et al. Posterior partial crowns out of lithium disilicate (LS2) with or without posts: A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial with a 3-year follow up. J Dent 2019; 83: 12-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.004 ] [PMID: 30716452]
[10]
Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2015; 41(3): 309-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006 ] [PMID: 25459568]
[11]
Garcia PP, Wambier LM, de Geus JL, da Cunha LF, Correr GM, Gonzaga CC. Do anterior and posterior teeth treated with post-and-core restorations have similar failure rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pros Dent 2019; 121(6): 887-94.
[12]
Naumann M, Sterzenbac G, Alexandra F, Dietrich T. Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: preliminary results after up to 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20(5): 499-503.
[PMID: 17944340]
[13]
Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod 2012; 38(12): 1557-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.015 ] [PMID: 23146637]
[14]
Wang X, Shu X, Zhang Y, Yang B, Jian Y, Zhao K. Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int 2019; 50(1): 8-20.
[PMID: 30600326]
[15]
Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Debels E, Lesaffre E, Naert I. An up to 3-Year Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Outcome of Glass Fiber Posts and Composite Cores with Gold Alloy-Based Posts and Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24(4): 363-72.
[PMID: 21716975]
[16]
Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13(Spec No): 15B-8B.
[PMID: 11763866]
[17]
Soares CJ, Valdivia AD, da Silva GR, Santana FR, Menezes Mde S. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2012; 23(2): 135-740.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000200008 ] [PMID: 22666771]
[18]
Jiangkongkho P, Kamonkhantikul K, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using fiber post with an elastic modulus similar to dentin. Dent Mater J 2013; 32(5): 781-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-052 ] [PMID: 24088834]
[19]
Radovic I, Corciolani G, Magni E, Krstanovic G, Pavlovic V, Vulicevic ZR, et al. Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2009.; 25(7): 837-44. .
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.004]
[20]
Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116(6): 557-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x ] [PMID: 19049527]
[21]
Teshigawara D, Ino T, Otsuka H, Isogai T, Fujisawa M. Influence of elastic modulus mismatch between dentin and post-and-core on sequential bonding failure. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63(2): 227-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.12.003 ] [PMID: 30651211]
[22]
Ona M, Wakabayashi N, Yamazaki T, Takaichi A, Igarashi Y. The influence of elastic modulus mismatch between tooth and post and core restorations on root fracture. Int Endod J 2013; 46(1): 47-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02092.x ] [PMID: 22775227]
[23]
Sathorn C, Palamara JE, Palamara D, Messer HH. Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis. J Endod 2005; 31(4): 288-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000140579.17573.f7 ] [PMID: 15793386]
[24]
Türker SA, Özçelik B, Yilmaz Z. Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Fracture Resistance of Different Post Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16(10): 788-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1758 ] [PMID: 26581458]
[25]
Hill EE, Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J 2011; 56(Suppl. 1): 67-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01297.x ] [PMID: 21564117]
[26]
Alenzi A, Samran A, Samran A, et al. Restoration Strategies of Endodontically Treated Teeth among Dental Practitioners in Saudi Arabia. A Nationwide Pilot Survey. Dent J (Basel) 2018; 6(3) E44
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030044 ] [PMID: 30177593]
[27]
Krunić N. The significance of the size and type of surface of prepared teeth for retention of permanent dentures fixed with zinc-phosphate cement. Stomatologia (Mosk) 2003; 82(6): 52-4.
[PMID: 14671594]
[28]
Fakiha Z, Al-Aujan A, Al-Shamrani S. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques. J Prosthodont 2001; 10(1): 37-41.
[29]
Vargas JW, Liewehr FR, Joyce AP, Runner RR. A comparison of the in vitro retentive strength of glass-ionomer cement, zinc-phosphate cement, and mineral trioxide aggregate for the retention of prefabricated posts in bovine incisors. J Endod 2004; 30(11): 775-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200411000-00006 ] [PMID: 15505508]
[30]
Wassell RW, Barker D, Steele JG. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: try-in and cementation of crowns. Br Dent J 2002; 193(1): 17-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801473]
[31]
Axelsson B. The solubility of dental zinc phosphate cements. Odontol Revy 1965; 16: 131-4.
[PMID: 14308501]
[32]
Wilson AD, Abel G, Lewis BG. The ‘solubility and disintegration’ test for zinc phosphate dental cements: the use of small specimens. J Dent 1976; 4(1): 28-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(76)90067-1 ] [PMID: 1063140]
[33]
Wilson AD, Abel G, Lewis BG. The solubility and disintegration test for zinc phosphate dental cements. A chemical study. Br Dent J 1974; 137(8): 313-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4803314 ] [PMID: 4531342]
[34]
Farid F, Mahgoli H, Hosseini A, Chiniforush N. Effect of eugenol-containing and resin endodontic sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts cemented with zinc phosphate and resin cements. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57(4): 284-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.08.002 ] [PMID: 24095644]
[35]
Strefezza C, Amaral MM, Quinto J Jr, Gouw-Soares SC, Zamataro CB, Zezell DM. Effect of 830 nm Diode Laser Irradiation of Root Canal on Bond Strength of Metal and Fiber Post. Photomed Laser Surg 2018; 36(8): 439-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4378 ] [PMID: 29768091]
[36]
De Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF, Lopes GC. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23(4): 358-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140524]
[37]
Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10(4): 251-8.
[PMID: 18792695]
[38]
Weiser F, Behr M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical review. J Prosthodont 2015; 24(2): 100-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12192]
[39]
Barbosa De Souza F, Sinclér Delfino C, Lacalle Turbino M, Braz R. Deproteinized dentin: a favorable substrate to self-bonding resin cements? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 98(2): 387-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31863 ] [PMID: 21648064]
[40]
Chen L, Lei HY, Xu GF, Liang XP, Li JJ. Bonding interfaces of three kinds of cements and root canal dentin: A scanning electron microscope observation. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010; 28(2): 132-4.
[41]
El-Badrawy W, Hafez RM, El Naga AI, Ahmed DR. Nanoleakage for Self-Adhesive Resin Cements used in Bonding CAD/CAD Ceramic Material to Dentin. Eur J Dent 2011; 5(3): 281-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698893 ] [PMID: 21769269]
[42]
Hitz T, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength. Dent Mater 2012; 28(11): 1183-90.
[43]
Kenshima S, Francci C, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Filho LE. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer. J Dent 2006; 34(10): 775-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.001 ] [PMID: 16621219]
[44]
Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Dentin treatment effects on the bonding performance of self-adhesive resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118(1): 80-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00703.x ] [PMID: 20156269]
[45]
Barszczewska-Rybarek I, Chladek G. Studies on the Curing Efficiency and Mechanical Properties of Bis-GMA and TEGDMA Nanocomposites Containing Silver Nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19(12) E3937
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123937 ] [PMID: 30544584]
[46]
Gopal S, Irodi S, Mehta D, Subramanya S, Govindaraju VK. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots Restored with Fiber Posts Using Different Resin Cements- An In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11(2): ZC52-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/21167.9387 ] [PMID: 28384981]
[47]
Yousry MM. Effect of re-etching oxalate-occluded dentin and enamel on bonding effectiveness of etch-and-rinse adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14(1): 31-8.
[PMID: 22282758]
[48]
Rodrigues RF, Ramos CM, Francisconi PA, Borges AF. The shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and enamel: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113(3): 220-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.008 ] [PMID: 25444282]
[49]
Bitter K, Meyer-Lückel H, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts. Am J Dent 2006; 19(3): 138-42.
[PMID: 16838475]
[50]
Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51(2): 333-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001 ] [PMID: 17532916]
[51]
Hirabayashi S, Yoshida E, Hayakawa T. SEM analysis of microstructure of adhesive interface between resin cement and dentin treated with self-etching primer. Dent Mater J 2011; 30(4): 528-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-197 ] [PMID: 21778607]
[52]
Kukletová M, Halacková Z, Horký D, Matousek A, Gojisová E, Cihlár J. Comparison of dentine-resin interface in total-etch and self-etching adhesives using electron microscopy. Prague Med Rep 2007; 108(4): 358-67.
[PMID: 18780648]
[53]
Liao ZQ, Ouyang Y, Yang JZ. Nanoleakage at the resin-dental interface of four self-etching adhesives. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2011; 46(9): 554-7.
[54]
Teixeira CS, Chain MC. Evaluation of shear bond strength between self-etching adhesive systems and dentin and analysis of the resin-dentin interface. Gen Dent 2010; 58(2): e52-61.
[PMID: 20236904]
[55]
Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29(6): 528-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00855.x ] [PMID: 12071920]
[56]
Waldman GL, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems. Open Dent J 2008; 2: 120-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210600802010120 ] [PMID: 19444319]
[57]
Walker MP, Wang Y, Spencer P. Morphological and chemical characterization of the dentin/resin cement interface produced with a self-etching primer. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4(3): 181-9.
[PMID: 12666753]
[58]
Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post. Dent Mates 2008; 24(7): 967-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011]
[59]
Mazzoni A, Marchesi G, Cadenaro M, et al. Push-out stress for fibre posts luted using different adhesive strategies. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117(4): 447-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00656.x ] [PMID: 19627358]
[60]
Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2015; 31(7): 855-63..
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.015]
[61]
Daleprane B, Pereira CN, Bueno AC, Ferreira RC, Moreira AN, Magalhães CS. Bond strength of fiber posts to the root canal: Effects of anatomic root levels and resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116(3): 416-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.030 ] [PMID: 27086107]
[62]
Almohareb T. Sealing Ability of Esthetic Post and Core Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(7): 627-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2096 ] [PMID: 28713120]
[63]
Brondani LP, Pereira-Cenci T, Wandsher VF, Pereira GK, Valandro LF, Bergoli CD. Longevity of metal-ceramic crowns cemented with self-adhesive resin cement: a prospective clinical study. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31 e22
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0022 ] [PMID: 28403329]
[64]
Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Carlini-Júnior B, Ferraz CC. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. Int Endod J 2011; 44(4): 314-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01831.x ] [PMID: 21219360]
[65]
Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117(3): 326-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x ] [PMID: 19583763]
[66]
Makishi P, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Wei S, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12(5): 393-401.
[PMID: 20157654]
[67]
Moda MD, Fagundes TC, Briso ALF, Dos Santos PH. Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro. PLoS One 2018; 13(11) e0208024
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208024 ] [PMID: 30475892]
[68]
Souza NC, Marcondes ML, Breda RV, Weber JB, Mota EG, Spohr AM. Relined fiberglass post: an ex vivo study of the resin cement thickness and dentin-resin interface. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30(1): S1806-83242016000100274.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0077 ] [PMID: 27556553]
[69]
Perdigao J, Monteiro P, Gomes G, Santos V. Restoring teeth with prefabricated fiber-reinforced resin posts. Northwest Dent 2009; 88(2): 16-7.
[70]
Perdigão J, Monteiro P, Gomes G, Santos V. Restoring teeth with prefabricated fiber-reinforced resin posts. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19(6): 359-64.
[PMID: 17821941]
[71]
Sterzenbach G, Karajouli G, Naumann M, Peroz I, Bitter K. Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements-an evaluation of different adhesive approaches. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70(5): 368-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.603702 ] [PMID: 21815838]
[72]
Bitter K, Gläser C, Neumann K, Blunck U, Frankenberger R. Analysis of resin-dentin interface morphology and bond strength evaluation of core materials for one stage post-endodontic restorations. PLoS One 2014; 9(2) e86294
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086294 ] [PMID: 24586248]
[73]
Bueno CE, Pelegrine RA, Silveira CF, et al. The impact of endodontic irrigating solutions on the push-out shear bond strength of glass fiber posts luted with resin cements. Gen Dent 2016; 64(1): 26-30.
[PMID: 26742163]
[74]
Dias LL, Giovani AR, Silva Sousa YT, Vansan LP, Alfredo E, Sousa-Neto MD. Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17(6): 579-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600008]
[75]
Al-Ali K. Effect of eugenol-based root canal sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts luted with resin cement. Saudi Dent J 2009; 21(2): 69-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2009.07.003 ] [PMID: 23960462]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 2
ISSUE: 1
Year: 2020
Page: [70 - 77]
Pages: 8
DOI: 10.2174/2542579X02999200702124845
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 15
HTML: 3