Giannopoulos AA, Steigner ML, George E, et al. Cardiothoracic applications of 3-dimensional printing. J Thorac Imaging 2016; 31: 253-72.
Ryan J, Plasencia J, Richardson R, et al. 3D printing for congenital heart disease: a single site’s initial three-year experience. 3D Print Med 2018; 4: 10.
Lau I, Liu D, Xu L, Fan Z, Sun Z. Clinical value of patient-specific three-dimensional printing of congenital heart disease: Quantitative and qualitative assessments. PLoS One 2018; 13 e0194333
Sun Z, Lau I, Wong YH, Yeong CH. Personalized three-dimensional printed models in congenital heart disease. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 522.
Sun Z, Lee S. A systematic review of 3-D printing in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Anatol J Cardiol 2017; 17: 423-35.
Lau I, Sun Z. Dimensional accuracy and clinical value of 3D printed models in congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 1483.
White SC, Sedler J, Jones TW, Seckeler M. Utility of three-dimensional models in resident education on simple and complex intracardiac congenital heart defects. Congenit Heart Dis 2018; 13(6): 1045-9.
Loke YH, Harahsheh AS, Krieger A, Olivieri LJ. Usage of 3D models of tetralogy of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart disease. BMC Med Educ 2017; 17: 54.
Su W, Xiao Y, He S, Huang P, Deng X. Three-dimensional printing models in congenital heart disease education for medical students: a controlled comparative study. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18(1): 178.
Smerling J, Marboe CC, Lefkowitch JH, et al. Utility of 3D printed cardiac models for medical student education in congenital heart disease: across a spectrum of disease severity. Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 40: 1258-65.
Lim KH, Loo ZY, Goldie S, Adams J, McMenamin P. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016; 9: 213-21.
Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv 2015; 1 e1500758
Velasco Forte MN, Byrne N, Valverde Perez I, et al. 3D printed models in patients with coronary artery fistulae: anatomical assessment and interventional planning. EuroIntervention 2017; 13: e1080-3.
Aroney N, Lau K, Daniele L, et al. Three-dimensional printing: to guide management of a right coronary artery to left ventricular fistula. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 19: 268.
Oliveira-Santos M, Oliveira-Santos E, Gonçalves L, Marques JS. Cardiovascular three-dimensional printing in non-congenital percutaneous interventions. Heart Lung Circ 2019; 28: 1525-34.
Lee M, Moharem-Elgamal S, Beckingham R, et al. Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK. BMJ Open 2019; 9 e025227
Sun Z, Ng CK, Squelch A. Synchrotron radiation computed tomography assessment of calcified plaques and coronary stenosis with different slice thicknesses and beam energies on 3D printed coronary models. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9: 6-22.
Sun Z, Jansen S, Sun Z, Jansen S. Personalized 3D printed coronary models in coronary stenting. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9: 1356-67.
Sun Z. 3D printed coronary models offer new opportunities for developing coronary CT angiography protocols in imaging coronary stents. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9: 1350-5.
Sun Z, Almutairi AM. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73: 266-73.
Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69: 489-95.
Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Pepi M, Bartorelli A. Multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 645-55.
Liu WJ, Li GZ, Liu HF, Lei JQ. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Echocardiography 2018; 35: 541-50.
Liu HF, Wang M, Xu YS, Shrestha MK, Lei JQ. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source and 320-row computed tomography angiography in detecting coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 2019; 60: 149-59.
Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography performed in 100 consecutive patients with coronary stents using a whole-organ high-definition CT scanner. Int J Cardiol 2019; 274: 382-7.
Eckert J, Renczes-Janetzko P, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtländer T, Schmermund A. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using third-generation dual-source CT for ruling out in-stent restenosis. Clin Res Cardiol 2019; 108: 402-10.
Mangold S, Cannaó PM, Schoepf UJ, et al. Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 1871-8.
Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent restenosis using model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography: initial experience. Br J Radiol 2018; 91 20170598
Ulrich A, Burg MC, Raupach R, et al. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using different convolution kernels and postprocessing filters. Acta Radiol 2015; 56: 42-50.
Hickethier T, Wenning J, Doerner J, Maintz D, Michels G, Bunck AC. Fourth update on CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 24 novel stent types. Acta Radiol 2018; 59: 1060-5.
Gassenmaier T, Petri N, Allmendinger T, et al. Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2953-61.