Clinicians' and Midwives' Views of Factors Influencing Decision-making for Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section: A Qualitative Study

Author(s): Roghieh Bayrami, Roksana Janghorban*

Journal Name: Current Women`s Health Reviews

Volume 16 , Issue 4 , 2020

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing in both developed and developing countries. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is an important option for reducing the CS rate.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to explore clinicians' and midwives' views of factors influencing decision-making for VBAC based on the theory of planned behavior.

Methods: This qualitative study was carried out in Urmia- Iran, during 2017-2018. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 21 obstetricians and midwives. Participants were selected among governmental hospitals through purposeful sampling until data saturation was reached. Data were analyzed through a directed content analysis approach using the MAXQDA software version 10.

Results: Three themes and seven sub-themes including 1. "attitude toward VBAC": positive attitude and negative attitude; 2. "control belief": organizational support, fear, and self-efficacy; and 3. "subjective norms": peer recommendation and maternal perceived pressure were emerged from data analysis.

Conclusion: Clinicians' and midwives' positive attitude and clinicians' self-efficacy could reinforce their intentions to select VBAC and support the mother. Insufficient organization support, clinicians' and midwives' negative attitude, clinicians' and women's fear, clinicians' peer recommendation and pressure of outside sources, which is perceived by mothers, could be barrier factors for VBAC.

Keywords: Vaginal birth after cesarean, cesarean section, clinicians, midwives, delivery, qualitative research.

[1]
Stjernholm YV, Petersson K, Eneroth E. Changed indications for cesarean sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89(1): 49-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016340903418777] [PMID: 19916892]
[2]
Betràn AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21(2): 98-113.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x] [PMID: 17302638]
[3]
Nilsson C, Lalor J, Begley C, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women Birth 2017; 30(6): 481-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.009] [PMID: 28545775]
[4]
WHO statement on caesarean section rates. World Health Organization. 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/ [Accessed on: March 5, 2019]
[5]
Betràn AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016; 11(2) e0148343
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343] [PMID: 26849801]
[6]
World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2018/en/ [Accessed on: March 10, 2019]
[7]
Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health 2014; 43(5): 545-55.
[PMID: 26060756]
[8]
Rafiei M, Saei Ghare M, Akbari M, et al. Prevalence, causes, and complications of cesarean delivery in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 2018; 16(4): 221-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.16.4.221] [PMID: 29942930]
[9]
Foureur M, Ryan CL, Nicholl M, Homer C. Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Birth 2010; 37(1): 3-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00372.x] [PMID: 20402716]
[10]
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin No. 184: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130(5): e217-33.
[PMID: 29064970]
[11]
Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010; (191): 1-397.
[PMID: 20629481]
[12]
Halvorsen L1. Nerum H, Sørlie T, Oian P. Does counsellor’s attitude influence change in a request for a caesarean in women with fear of birth? Midwifery 2010; 26(1): 45-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.011] [PMID: 18621452]
[13]
Gunnervik C, Josefsson A, Sydsjö A, Sydsjö G. Attitudes towards Mode of birth among Swedish midwives. Midwifery 2010; 26(1): 38-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.006] [PMID: 18632194]
[14]
Churchill H, Francome C. British midwives’ views on rising caesarean section rates. Br J Midwifery 2009; 17(12): 774-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2009.17.12.45545]
[15]
Cox KJ. Providers’ perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-72] [PMID: 21992871]
[16]
Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: approach to delivery after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34(5): 331-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.006] [PMID: 20869549]
[17]
Wingert A, Hartling L, Sebastianski M, et al. Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19(1): 529.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2689-5] [PMID: 31888540]
[18]
Lundgren I, Healy P, Carroll M, et al. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16(1): 350.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1144-0] [PMID: 27832743]
[19]
Foureur M, Turkmani S, Clack DC, et al. Caring for women wanting a vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A qualitative study of the experiences of midwives and obstetricians. Women Birth 2017; 30(1): 3-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.011] [PMID: 27318563]
[20]
Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001; 40(Pt 4): 471-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939] [PMID: 11795063]
[21]
Rich A, Brandes K, Mullan B, Hagger MS. Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med 2015; 38(4): 673-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3] [PMID: 25994095]
[22]
Zoellner J, Krzeski E, Harden S, Cook E, Allen K, Estabrooks PA. Qualitative application of the theory of planned behavior to understand beverage consumption behaviors among adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112(11): 1774-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.368] [PMID: 23102176]
[23]
Ajzen I. Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology In: Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1987; 20: pp. 1-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60411-6]
[24]
Noar SM. A health educator' guide to theories of health behavior Int Q Community Health Educ 2005-2006-2006. 24(1): 75-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/DALP-3F95-GCT3-M922] [PMID: 17690053]
[25]
Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62(1): 107-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x] [PMID: 18352969]
[26]
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15(9): 1277-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687] [PMID: 16204405]
[27]
Emmett CL, Murphy DJ, Patel RR, et al. DiAMOND Study Group. Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expect 2007; 10(2): 161-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00429.x] [PMID: 17524009]
[28]
Litorp H, Mgaya A, Kidanto HL, Johnsdotter S, Essen B. “What about the mother? ”Women’s and caregivers perspectives on caesarean birth in a low-resource setting with rising caesarean section rates. Midwifery 2015; 31(7): 713-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.008] [PMID: 25886967]
[29]
Lundgren I, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nilsson C. Clinicians views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 196.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6] [PMID: 26314295]
[30]
Bagheri A, Masoudi Alavi N, Abbaszadeh F. Iranian obstetricians’ views about the factors that influence pregnant women’s choice of delivery method: a qualitative study. Women Birth 2013; 26(1): e45-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.09.004] [PMID: 23083642]
[31]
Yazdizadeh B, Nedjat S, Mohammad K, Rashidian A, Changizi N, Majdzadeh R. Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 159.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-159] [PMID: 21729279]
[32]
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth Green-top guideline No 45. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: RCOG Press 2015.
[33]
Coleman VH, Erickson K, Schulkin J, Zinberg S, Sachs BP. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists. J Reprod Med 2005; 50(4): 261-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000180847.45288.49] [PMID: 15916210]
[34]
Litorp H, Mgaya A, Mbekenga CK, Kidanto HL, Johnsdotter S, Essen B. Fear, blame and transparency: Obstetric caregivers’ rationales for high caesarean section rates in a low-resource setting. Soc Sci Med 2015; 143: 232-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.003] [PMID: 26364010]
[35]
Lyerly AD, Little MO. Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34(5): 337-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.007] [PMID: 20869550]
[36]
Darling EK. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: outcomes of women receiving midwifery care in Ontario. Can J Midwifery Res Pract 2011; 10(1): 9-19.
[37]
Avery MD, Carr CA, Burkhardt P. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a pilot study of outcomes in women receiving midwifery care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49(2): 113-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.12.014] [PMID: 15010663]
[38]
Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators towards implementing guidelines to reduce caesarean section rates in Quebec. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85(10): 791-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.06.039289] [PMID: 18038061]
[39]
Colomar M, Cafferata ML, Aleman A, et al. Mode of childbirth in low-risk pregnancies: Nicaraguan physicians’ viewpoints. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18(10): 2382-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1478-z] [PMID: 24740720]
[40]
Kamal P, Dixon-Woods M, Kurinczuk JJ, Oppenheimer C, Squire P, Waugh J. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians’ and midwives’ accounts. BJOG 2005; 112(8): 1054-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00647.x] [PMID: 16045517]
[41]
Long Q, Kingdon C, Yang F, et al. Prevalence of and reasons for women’s, family members’, and health professionals’ preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2018; 15(10) e1002672
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002672] [PMID: 30325928]
[42]
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84(2): 191-215.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191] [PMID: 847061]
[43]
Taghizadeh Z, Khoshnam Rad M, Kazemnejad A. Midwives’ professional competencies for preventing maternal mortality in disasters: A cross-sectional study in Iran. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2018; 12(3): 305-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2017.58] [PMID: 28854997]
[44]
Nilsson C, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lundgren I. Vaginal birth after cesarean: Views of women from countries with high VBAC rates. Qual Health Res 2017; 27(3): 325-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732315612041] [PMID: 26531882]
[45]
Dexter SC, Windsor S, Watkinson SJ. Meeting the challenge of maternal choice in mode of delivery with vaginal birth after caesarean section: a medical, legal and ethical commentary. BJOG 2014; 121(2): 133-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12409] [PMID: 24034671]
[46]
Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109(1): 57-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6] [PMID: 17197588]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 16
ISSUE: 4
Year: 2020
Published on: 09 September, 2020
Page: [334 - 340]
Pages: 7
DOI: 10.2174/1573404816999200511102757
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 23
HTML: 1