Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Artery Occlusion May be Detrimental with Thrombus Fragmentation

Author(s): Ho Jun Yi, Jae Hoon Sung*, Dong Hoon Lee

Journal Name: Current Neurovascular Research

Volume 17 , Issue 1 , 2020

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Abstract:

Objective: We investigated whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) affected the outcomes and complications of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), specifically focusing on thrombus fragmentation.

Methods: The patients who underwent MT for large artery occlusion (LAO) were classified into two groups: MT with prior IVT (MT+IVT) group and MT without prior IVT (MT-IVT) group. The clinical outcome, successful recanalization with other radiological outcomes, and complications were compared, between two groups. Subgroup analysis was also performed for patients with simultaneous application of stent retriever and aspiration.

Results: There were no significant differences in clinical outcome and successful recanalization rate, between both groups. However, the ratio of pre- to peri-procedural thrombus fragmentation was significantly higher in the MT+IVT group (14.6% and 16.2%, respectively; P=0.004) compared to the MT-IVT group (5.1% and 6.8%, respectively; P=0.008). The MT+IVT group required more second stent retriever (16.2%), more stent passages (median value = 2), and more occurrence of distal emboli (3.9%) than the MT-IVT group (7.9%, median value = 1, and 8.1%, respectively) (P=0.004, 0.008 and 0.018, respectively). In subgroup analysis, the results were similar to those of the entire patients.

Conclusion: Thrombus fragmentation of IVT with t-PA before MT resulted in an increased need for additional rescue therapies, and it could induce more distal emboli. The use of IVT prior to MT does not affect the clinical outcome and successful recanalization, compared with MT without prior IVT. Therefore, we need to reconsider the need for IVT before MT.

Keywords: Ischemic stroke, thrombectomy, thrombolysis, tissue plasminogen activator, involving large artery occlusion, cerebral infarction.

[1]
Hacke, W.; Kaste, M.; Bluhmki, E. ECASS Investigators, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med., 2008, 359(13), 1317-1329.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804656] [PMID: 18815396]
[2]
Wardlaw, J.M.; Murray, V.; Berge, E.; del Zoppo, G.J. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2014, (7) CD000213https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25072528
[PMID: 25072528]
[3]
Berkhemer, OA; Fransen, PS; Beumer, D MR CLEAN Investigators, A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med., 2015, 372(1), 11-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411587] [PMID: 25517348]
[4]
Campbell, B.C.; Mitchell, P.J.; Kleinig, T.J. EXTEND-IA Investigators, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N. Engl. J. Med., 2015, 372(11), 1009-1018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414792] [PMID: 25671797]
[5]
Goyal, M.; Demchuk, A.M.; Menon, B.K. ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med., 2015, 372(11), 1019-1030.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414905] [PMID: 25671798]
[6]
Saver, J.L.; Goyal, M.; Bonafe, A. SWIFT PRIME Investigators, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N. Engl. J. Med., 2015, 372(24), 2285-2295.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061] [PMID: 25882376]
[7]
Broeg-Morvay, A.; Mordasini, P.; Bernasconi, C. Direct mechanical intervention versus combined intravenous and mechanical intervention in large artery anterior circulation stroke: A matched-pairs analysis. Stroke, 2016, 47(4), 1037-1044.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011134] [PMID: 26906917]
[8]
Mistry, E.A.; Mistry, A.M.; Nakawah, M.O. Mechanical thrombectomy outcomes with and without intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients: A meta-analysis. Stroke, 2017, 48(9), 2450-2456.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017320] [PMID: 28747462]
[9]
Tsivgoulis, G.; Katsanos, A.H.; Mavridis, D.; Magoufis, G.; Arthur, A.; Alexandrov, A.V. mechanical thrombectomy improves functional outcomes independent of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke, 2016, 47(6), 1661-1664.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013097] [PMID: 27094996]
[10]
Gerschenfeld, G.; Muresan, I.P.; Blanc, R. Two paradigms for endovascular thrombectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol., 2017, 74(5), 549-556.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5823] [PMID: 28319240]
[11]
Behme, D.; Kabbasch, C.; Kowoll, A. Intravenous thrombolysis facilitates successful recanalization with stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy in middle cerebral artery occlusions. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., 2016, 25(4), 954-959.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.007] [PMID: 26851970]
[12]
Leker, R.R.; Pikis, S.; Gomori, J.M.; Cohen, J.E. Is bridging necessary? A pilot study of bridging versus primary stentriever-based endovascular reperfusion in large anterior circulation strokes. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., 2015, 24(6), 1163-1167.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.01.008] [PMID: 25869772]
[13]
Pfefferkorn, T.; Holtmannspötter, M.; Patzig, M. Preceding intravenous thrombolysis facilitates endovascular mechanical recanalization in large intracranial artery occlusion. Int. J. Stroke, 2012, 7(1), 14-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00639.x] [PMID: 22010996]
[14]
Abilleira, S.; Ribera, A.; Cardona, P. Catalan stroke code and reperfusion consortium. outcomes after direct thrombectomy or combined intravenous and endovascular treatment are not different. Stroke, 2017, 48(2), 375-378.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015857] [PMID: 28062859]
[15]
Kaesmacher, J.; Kleine, J.F. Bridging Therapy with i.v. rtPA in MCA occlusion prior to endovascular thrombectomy: A double-edged sword? Clin. Neuroradiol., 2018, 28(1), 81-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-016-0533-0] [PMID: 27541957]
[16]
Guedin, P.; Larcher, A.; Decroix, J.P. Prior IV thrombolysis facilitates mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., 2015, 24(5), 952-957.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.12.015] [PMID: 25804567]
[17]
Sandercock, P.; Wardlaw, J.M.; Lindley, R.I. IST-3 collaborative group. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2012, 379(9834), 2352-2363.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60768-5] [PMID: 22632908]
[18]
Takagi, T; Yoshimura, S; Uchida, K Committee of Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism (RESCUE)-Japan Study Group, et al Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator before endovascular treatment increases symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery second division: subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(2), 147-153.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1608-3] [PMID: 26494464]
[19]
Rai, A.T.; Boo, S.; Buseman, C. Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy for large vessel strokes can lead to significantly higher hospital costs without improving outcomes. J. Neurointerv. Surg., 2018, 10(1), 17-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012830] [PMID: 28062805]
[20]
Desilles, J.P.; Loyau, S.; Syvannarath, V. Alteplase reduces downstream microvascular thrombosis and improves the benefit of large artery recanalization in stroke. Stroke, 2015, 46(11), 3241-3248.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010721] [PMID: 26443832]
[21]
Kaesmacher, J.; Boeckh-Behrens, T.; Simon, S. Risk of thrombus fragmentation during endovascular stroke treatment. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., 2017, 38(5), 991-998.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5105] [PMID: 28279987]
[22]
Coutinho, J.M.; Liebeskind, D.S.; Slater, L.A. Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy vs. thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of the SWIFT and STAR studies. JAMA Neurol., 2017, 74(3), 268-274.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5374] [PMID: 28097310]
[23]
Delgado Almandoz, J.E.; Kayan, Y.; Young, M.L. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy using either Solumbra or ADAPT techniques. J. Neurointerv. Surg., 2016, 8(11), 1123-1128.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012122] [PMID: 26667250]
[24]
Choi, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Lee, K.J.; Koo, J.S.; Kim, B.S.; Shin, Y.S. Comparison of outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy alone or combined with intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. World Neurosurg., 2018, 114, e165-e172.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.126] [PMID: 29510288]
[25]
Merlino, G.; Sponza, M.; Petralia, B. Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: A prospective single-center study. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis, 2017, 44(2), 203-209.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1527-8] [PMID: 28702769]
[26]
Bhatia, R.; Shobha, N.; Menon, B.K. Combined full-dose IV and endovascular thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Int. J. Stroke, 2014, 9(8), 974-979.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00890.x] [PMID: 23013039]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 17
ISSUE: 1
Year: 2020
Page: [18 - 26]
Pages: 9
DOI: 10.2174/1567202617666191223143831
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 28
HTML: 2
EPUB: 1
PRC: 1