The Impact of Nitrogen Fixers and Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes on Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Yield

Author(s): V. Vijayalakshmi*, S. Pradeep, H. Manjunatha, V. Krishna, V. Jyothi

Journal Name: Current Biotechnology

Volume 9 , Issue 3 , 2020


Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Objective: The inoculants, mainly nitrogen fixers and phosphate solubilizing microbes, have an influence on plant growth attributes. The current study was conducted to assess the fertilizing activity of A. chroocaccum and B. megaterium strains on growth, yield parameters and nutrient uptake of Sorghum bicolor.

Methods: The isolation and identification of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium- A. chroocaccum and phosphate solubilizing microbe- B. megaterium and the growth and yield parameters of Sorghum bicolor as well as NPK uptake levels were studied.

Results: A. chroocaccum and B. megaterium exhibited the proliferation of microbial population in soil by synergistic interaction with plants, and the application increased the availability of NPK in the soil after harvest of the crop. These beneficial inoculants are also known to help in the uptake of some other nutrients. The maximum beneficial aspects of the plant were noticed in the plants inoculated with 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF)+ A. chroocaccum+ B. megaterium, and the least was noticed in the control plants at all growth stages and at the time of harvest.

Conclusion: From this study, it can be concluded that the beneficial effect of A. chroocaccum and B. megaterium is observed in sorghum crop with improved yield and nutrient uptake. Therefore, this species can be used extensively for future inoculation of the sorghum crop for better growth and development and for good returns in an ecological way.

Keywords: A. chroocaccum, B. megaterium, bio-fertilizer, sorghum, compatability, NPK.

[1]
Arun KS. Bio-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture mechanism of P-solubilization. 6th ed. Jodhpur, India: Agribios publishers 2007; pp. 196-7.
[2]
Maryenko VG. Dokt TSHA, No 99 1964; 2: 399-406.
[3]
Lipman JG. Soil bacteriological studies. Further contributions to the physiology and morphology of the members of the Azotobacter group Report of the New Jersey State Agricultural Experiment station 1904; 25: 237-89.
[4]
Krassilnikov NA. Guide to the bacteria and actinomycetes (Russian) Akad Nauk. Moscow: S.S.S.R. 1949; p. 198.
[5]
Dobereiner J. Azotobacter pasapali sp.n. urna bactreia fixodora de nitrogenio na rizosfera de Paspalum. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 1966; 1: 357-65.
[6]
Thompson JP, Skerman VBD. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List no. 6. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1981; 31: 215-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-31-2-215]
[7]
Shivaprasad S. Physiological response of sodium- dependant Azotoabcter chrocaccum strain 184 to oxygen stress. 1991.
[8]
Horner CK, Burk D, Allison FE, Sherman MS. Nitrogen fixation by Azotobacter as influenced by molybdenum and vanadium. J Agric Res 1942; 65: 173-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00172-7]
[9]
Wani SP, Lee KK. Biofertilizers role in upland crops production: Fertilizers, Organic manures, recyclable wastes and biofertilizers (Tandon HLS, Ed) In: New Delhi, India: Fertilizers development and Consultation Organization. 1992; pp. 91-112.
[10]
Wani SP. Improving the livelihoods: New partenrships for win-win solutions for natural resource management. Paper submitted in the 2nd International Agronomy Congress held at New Delhi, India during 26-30 November
[11]
Adesemoye AO, Kloepper JW. Plant-microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009; 85(1): 1-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2196-0] [PMID: 19707753]
[12]
Khrurana AL, Dudeja SS. Biological nitrogen fixation technology for pulses production in India Technical Bulletin. Kanpur: Indian Institute of Pulses Research 1997; pp. 1-18.
[13]
Wu SC, Cao ZH. Effect of biofertilizer containing N- fixers, P & K solubilizers and AM fungi o maize growth: A greenhouse trial, Geoderma. Elsevier publishers 2005; pp. 155-66.
[14]
Ghosh R, Tarafdar A, Sharma M. Rapid and sensitive diagnoses of dry root rot pathogen of chickpea (Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler) using loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 42737.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42737] [PMID: 28218268]
[15]
Kreig NR, Holt JG. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins 1984; p. 1.
[16]
Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. PWN, Warsaw. Saunders D.L., Kalff J., 2001 Denitrification rate in the sediments of lake Mem-phremagog, Canada – USA. Water Res 1957; 35(8): 1897-904.
[17]
Subbaiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of vailable nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci 1956; 25: 259.
[18]
Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. 1973; pp. 38-56.
[19]
Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF. Lithium, sodium and potassium. In: Methods of soil analysis 2nd ed. 1982; pp. 199-224.
[20]
Gobeze L, Legesse H, Daniel M. Effect of inter and intra row spacing on yield and yield components of cassava in moisture stress areas. Proceedings of African Crop Science Society 2005; 147-50.
[21]
Vikram A, Hamzehzarghani H, Alagawadi AR, Krishnaraj PU, Chandrashekar BS. Production of plant growth promoting substances by phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from vertisols. J Plant Sci 2003; 2(3): 326.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jps.2007.326.333]
[22]
Gholami A, Shahsavani S, Nezarat S. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on germination, seedling growth and yield of Maize. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2009; 49: 156-62.
[23]
Abdel-Salam AA, Noufal EH, Shaban KA, Ahmed MA. Bipfertilization and efficient productivity of maize grown on a newly reclaimed saline sandy clay soil. 1st International Conference Bio technology Applications in Agriculture, Benha University, Moshtohor and Hurghada. 18-22 Feb.; Egypt. 2012.
[24]
Mathukia RK, Dobariya VK, Gohil BS, Chhodavadiya SK. Integrated weed management in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Advance in crop science and Technology 2014; 2: 139-44.
[25]
Aulakh MS, Pasricha NS, Bahl GS. Phosphorous fertilizer response in an irrigated soybeen-wheat production system on a subtrophical, semiarid soil. Field Crops Res 2003; 80(2): 99-109.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00172-7]


open access plus

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 9
ISSUE: 3
Year: 2020
Published on: 18 December, 2019
Page: [198 - 208]
Pages: 11
DOI: 10.2174/2211550109666191218125559

Article Metrics

PDF: 21
HTML: 4
EPUB: 1
PRC: 1