Evaluation of LVDD by CCTA with Dual-source CT in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Author(s): Zengfa Huang, Jianwei Xiao, Zuoqin Li, Yun Hu, Yuanliang Xie, Shutong Zhang*, Xiang Wang*

Journal Name: Current Medical Imaging
Formerly: Current Medical Imaging Reviews

Volume 16 , Issue 3 , 2020

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is a common abnormality among patients in T2DM.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the assessment of LVDD in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

Methods: 80 consecutive T2DM patients who were referred for a clinically dual-source CCTA examination to evaluate suspected coronary artery disease and also underwent 2D echocardiography within 7 days of CCTA inclusion and exclusion criteria, were performed. Correlation between CCTA and echocardiography was tested through linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: In total, 60 T2DM patients were included for the analysis. Pearson correlation showed good correlation for E (r = 0.28; P = 0.028), E/A (r = 0.69; P < 0.01); E (r = -0.06; P = 0.776), E/A (r = 0.54; P = 0.003) and E (r = 0.64; P < 0.01), E/A (r = 0.83; P < 0.01) in three groups, respectively. Overall, diagnostic accuracy for assessment in CCTA of diastolic dysfunction was 79.76% (95% CI: 68%-91%), 71.43% (95% CI: 58%-85%) and 87.50 (95% CI: 79%-96%) in three groups.

Conclusion: The presented study proved that CCTA showed good correlations in the estimation of LV filling pressures compared with echocardiography in T2DM patients. Accordingly, retrospectively ECG-gated CCTA may provide valuable information on the evaluation of LVDD in T2DM patients.

Keywords: Coronary computed tomography angiography, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, echocardiography, type 2 diabetes mellitus, patients, cardiovascular disease.

[1]
Morrish NJ, Wang SL, Stevens LK, Fuller JH, Keen H. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes. Diabetologia 2001; 44: S14-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000013955.34262.AF] [PMID: 11994265]
[2]
Redberg RF, Greenland P, Fuster V, et al. Prevention conference VI: Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Writing group III: risk assessment in persons with diabetes. Circulation 2002; 105(18): e144-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000013955.34262.AF] [PMID: 11994265]
[3]
Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 2010; 375(9733): 2215-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9] [PMID: 20609967]
[4]
From AM, Scott CG, Chen HH. Changes in diastolic dysfunction in diabetes mellitus over time. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103(10): 1463-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.358] [PMID: 19427447]
[5]
Paelinck BP, de Roos A, Bax JJ, et al. Feasibility of tissue magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study in comparison with tissue Doppler imaging and invasive measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45(7): 1109-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.051] [PMID: 15808772]
[6]
Hartiala JJ, Mostbeck GH, Foster E, et al. Velocity-encoded cine MRI in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: measurement of mitral valve and pulmonary vein flow velocities and flow volume across the mitral valve. Am Heart J 1993; 125(4): 1054-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(93)90114-O] [PMID: 8465728]
[7]
Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ. Evaluation of diastolic filling of left ventricle in health and disease: Doppler echocardiography is the clinician’s Rosetta stone. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30(1): 8-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00144-7] [PMID: 9207615]
[8]
Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: A comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 2000; 102(15): 1788-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.15.1788] [PMID: 11023933]
[9]
Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Redfield MM, Ilstrup DM, Holmes DR Jr, Tajik AJ. Noninvasive doppler echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with cardiomyopathies: a simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28(5): 1226-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00315-4] [PMID: 8890820]
[10]
Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26(15): 1482-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi261] [PMID: 15840624]
[11]
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(3): 552-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056] [PMID: 16053973]
[12]
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112(15): 2318-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471] [PMID: 16203914]
[13]
Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(1): 147-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.071] [PMID: 15992649]
[14]
van der Vleuten PA, de Jonge GJ, Lubbers DD, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRI. Eur Radiol 2009; 19(2): 271-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1138-z] [PMID: 18704432]
[15]
Palazzuoli A, Cademartiri F, Geleijnse ML, et al. Left ventricular remodelling and systolic function measurement with 64 multi-slice computed tomography versus second harmonic echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: a double blind study. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73(1): 82-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.022] [PMID: 19013044]
[16]
Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 2008; 248(2): 466-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482071478] [PMID: 18641250]
[17]
Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3(2): 122-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2009.01.001] [PMID: 19272853]
[18]
Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology 1993; 187(1): 261-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.187.1.8451425] [PMID: 8451425]
[19]
Boogers MJ, van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, et al. Feasibility of diastolic function assessment with cardiac CT: feasibility study in comparison with tissue Doppler imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4(3): 246-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.11.017] [PMID: 21414572]
[20]
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American society of echocardiography’s guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European association of echocardiography, a branch of the european society of cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18(12): 1440-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005] [PMID: 16376782]
[21]
Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. CAD-RADS: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Amer Coll Radiol 2016; 13(12 Pt A): 1458-66.
[22]
Klapholz M, Maurer M, Lowe AM, et al. Hospitalization for heart failure in the presence of a normal left ventricular ejection fraction: Results of the New York heart failure registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(8): 1432-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.040] [PMID: 15093880]
[23]
Fischer M, Baessler A, Hense HW, et al. Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the community. Results from a Doppler echocardiographic-based survey of a population sample. Eur Heart J 2003; 24(4): 320-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00428-1] [PMID: 12581679]
[24]
Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C, Sanderson JE, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the heart failure and echocardiography associations of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28(20): 2539-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm037] [PMID: 17428822]
[25]
van den Hurk K, Alssema M, Kamp O, et al. Independent associations of glucose status and arterial stiffness with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: an 8-year follow-up of the Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care 2012; 35(6): 1258-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1336] [PMID: 22399696]
[26]
Karamitsos TD, Karvounis HI, Dalamanga EG, et al. Early diastolic impairment of diabetic heart: the significance of right ventricle. Int J Cardiol 2007; 114(2): 218-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.02.003] [PMID: 16777248]
[27]
Caudron J, Fares J, Bauer F, Dacher JN. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function with cardiac MR imaging. Radiographics 2011; 31(1): 239-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.311105049] [PMID: 21257944]
[28]
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American Society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29(4): 277-314.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011] [PMID: 27037982]
[29]
Suzuki M, Kotooka N, Sakuma M, Nakazono T, Node K, Irie H. Validity and reliability of three-chamber-view three-directional encoded phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity-vector mapping for transmitral velocity measurements: comparison with Doppler echocardiography and intra- and inter-observer variability. Magn Reson Med Sci 2017; 16(2): 152-8.
[30]
Bollache E, Redheuil A, Clément-Guinaudeau S, et al. Automated left ventricular diastolic function evaluation from phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance and comparison with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-63] [PMID: 21062448]
[31]
García-Fernández MA, Azevedo J, Moreno M, et al. Regional diastolic function in ischaemic heart disease using pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging. Eur Heart J 1999; 20(7): 496-505.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1998.1278] [PMID: 10365286]
[32]
Wen Z, Ma H, Zhao Y, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction assessment with dual-source CT. PLoS One 2015; 10(5)e0127289
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127289] [PMID: 25993545]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 16
ISSUE: 3
Year: 2020
Page: [214 - 223]
Pages: 10
DOI: 10.2174/1573405615666191126101454

Article Metrics

PDF: 17
HTML: 4