Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Disruptive Technology, Single- Molecule Direct RNA Sequencing

Author(s): Chaithra Pradeep, Dharam Nandan, Arya A. Das, Dinesh Velayutham*

Journal Name: Current Bioinformatics

Volume 15 , Issue 2 , 2020

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: The standard approach for transcriptomic profiling involves high throughput short-read sequencing technology, mainly dominated by Illumina. However, the short reads have limitations in transcriptome assembly and in obtaining full-length transcripts due to the complex nature of transcriptomes with variable length and multiple alternative spliced isoforms. Recent advances in long read sequencing by the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offered both cDNA as well as direct RNA sequencing and has brought a paradigm change in the sequencing technology to greatly improve the assembly and expression estimates. ONT enables molecules to be sequenced without fragmentation resulting in ultra-long read length enabling the entire genes and transcripts to be fully characterized. The direct RNA sequencing method, in addition, circumvents the reverse transcription and amplification steps.

Objective: In this study, RNA sequencing methods were assessed by comparing data from Illumina (ILM), ONT cDNA (OCD) and ONT direct RNA (ODR).

Methods: The sensitivity & specificity of the isoform detection was determined from the data generated by Illumina, ONT cDNA and ONT direct RNA sequencing technologies using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as model. Comparative studies were conducted with two pipelines to detect the isoforms, novel genes and variable gene length.

Results: Mapping metrics and qualitative profiles for different pipelines are presented to understand these disruptive technologies. The variability in sequencing technology and the analysis pipeline were studied.

Keywords: Next generation sequencing, second-generation sequencing, third-generation single molecular sequencing, oxford nanopore technologies, illumina, principal components analysis.

[1]
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74(12): 5463-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463] [PMID: 271968]
[2]
Maxam AM, Gilbert W. A new method for sequencing DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74(2): 560-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.2.560] [PMID: 265521]
[3]
Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995; 270(5235): 467-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5235.467] [PMID: 7569999]
[4]
Lockhart DJ, Dong H, Byrne MC, et al. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Biotechnol 1996; 14(13): 1675-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1296-1675] [PMID: 9634850]
[5]
Marinov GK. On the design and prospects of direct RNA sequencing. Brief Funct Genomics 2017; 16(6): 326-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elw043] [PMID: 28334071]
[6]
van Dijk EL, Auger H, Jaszczyszyn Y, Thermes C. Ten years of next-generation sequencing technology. Trends Genet 2014; 30(9): 418-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.001] [PMID: 25108476]
[7]
Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10(1): 57-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484] [PMID: 19015660]
[8]
Wilhelm BT, Marguerat S, Watt S, et al. Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 2008; 453(7199): 1239-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07002] [PMID: 18488015]
[9]
Ozsolak F, Platt AR, Jones DR, et al. Direct RNA sequencing. Nature 2009; 461(7265): 814-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08390] [PMID: 19776739]
[10]
Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 2009; 323(5910): 133-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162986] [PMID: 19023044]
[11]
Clarke J, Wu H-C, Jayasinghe L, Patel A, Reid S, Bayley H. Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol 2009; 4(4): 265-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.12] [PMID: 19350039]
[12]
Magi A, Semeraro R, Mingrino A, et al. Nanopore sequencing data analysis: state of the art, applications and challenges. Brief Bioinform 2017.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx062] [PMID: 28637243]
[13]
Bolisetty MT, Rajadinakaran G, Graveley BR. Determining exon connectivity in complex mRNAs by nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 2015; 16: 204.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0777-z] [PMID: 26420219]
[14]
Hargreaves AD, Mulley JF. Assessing the utility of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for snake venom gland cDNA sequencing. PeerJ 2015; 3: e1441
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1441]
[15]
Haddad F, Qin AX, Giger JM, Guo H, Baldwin KM. Potential pitfalls in the accuracy of analysis of natural sense-antisense RNA pairs by reverse transcription-PCR. BMC Biotechnol 2007; 7: 21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-7-21] [PMID: 17480233]
[16]
Gubler U. Second-strand cDNA synthesis: classical method. Methods Enzymol 1987; 152: 325-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)52037-7] [PMID: 3657578]
[17]
Perocchi F, Xu Z, Clauder-Münster S, Steinmetz LM. Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(19): e128
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm683] [PMID: 17897965]
[18]
Cocquet J, Chong A, Zhang G, Veitia RA. Reverse transcriptase template switching and false alternative transcripts. Genomics 2006; 88(1): 127-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.12.013] [PMID: 16457984]
[19]
Mader RM, Schmidt WM, Sedivy R, et al. Reverse transcriptase template switching during reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: artificial generation of deletions in ribonucleotide reductase mRNA. J Lab Clin Med 2001; 137(6): 422-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mlc.2001.115452] [PMID: 11385363]
[20]
Garalde DR, Snell EA, Jachimowicz D, et al. Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. Nat Methods 2018; 15(3): 201-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4577] [PMID: 29334379]
[21]
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads 2011.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200]
[22]
Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 2015; 12(4): 357-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317] [PMID: 25751142]
[23]
Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33(3): 290-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3122] [PMID: 25690850]
[24]
Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2018; 34(18): 3094-100.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191] [PMID: 29750242]
[25]
Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47(D1): D419-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1038] [PMID: 30407594]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 15
ISSUE: 2
Year: 2020
Page: [165 - 172]
Pages: 8
DOI: 10.2174/1574893614666191017154427
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 12
HTML: 5