Influence of Dimensionless Parameter on De-Ionized Water-alumina Nanofluid Based Parabolic Trough Solar Collector

Author(s): Vijayan Gopalsamy*, Karunakaran Rajasekaran, Logesh Kamaraj, Siva Sivasaravanan, Metin Kok

Journal Name: Recent Patents on Nanotechnology

Volume 13 , Issue 3 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Background: Aqueous-alumina nanofluid was prepared using magnetic stirrer and ultrasonication process. Then, the prepared nanofluid was subjected to flow through the unshielded receiver of the parabolic trough solar collector to investigate the performance of the nanofluid and the effects of the dimensionless parameter were determined.

Methods: The experimental work has been divided into two sections. First, the nanofluid was prepared and tested for its morphology, dimensions, and sedimentation using X-Ray Diffraction and Raman shift method. Then, the nanofluids of various concentrations from 0 to 4.0% are used as heat transfer fluid in unshielded type collector. Finally, the effect of the dimensionless parameter on the performance was determined.

Results: For the whole test period, depending upon the bulk mean temperature, the dimensionless parameters such as Re and Nu varied from 1098 to 4552 & 19.30 to 46.40 for air and 2150 to 7551 & 11.11 to 48.54 for nanofluid. The enhancement of thermal efficiency found for 0% and 4.0% nanoparticle concentrations was 32.84% for the mass flow rate of 0.02 kg/s and 13.26% for the mass flow rate of 0.06 kg/s.

Conclusion: Re and Nu of air depend on air velocity and ambient temperature. Re increased with the mass flow rate and decreased with concentration. Heat loss occurred by convection mode of heat transfer. Heat transfer coefficient and global efficiency increased with increased mass flow rate and volume fraction. The thermal efficiency of both 0% and 4.0% concentrations became equal for increased mass flow rate. It has been proven that at high mass flow rates, the time available to absorb the heat energy from the receiver is insufficient.

Keywords: Unshielded receiver, friction factor, heat transfer medium, heat loss, heat removal, global efficiency, thermal efficiency, DIW, alumina.

Kalogirou S. Solar energy engineering: Processes and systems. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, Academic Press 2009.
Aringhoff R, Brakmann G, Geyer M, Teske S. Concentrated solar thermal power-now. Report of Greenpeace International, the European Solar Thermal Industry Association (ESTIA) and IEA SolarPACES Programme. 2005 Sep 15.
Kalogirou SA. Solar thermal collectors and applications. Pror Energy Combust Sci 2004; 30: 231-95.
Afolabi LO, Al-Kayiem HH, Tesfamicheal AB. On the nano-additive enhanced flat plate solar collector integrated with thermal energy storage. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2017; 7(2): 172-82.
Sunny SA. Instantaneous ‘Figure of Merit’ for conducting autonomous systematic meta-energy-economic analyses-numerically verifiable emission reduction devices. Curr Environ Eng 2016; 3(1): 38-60.
Kalogirou S. Recent patents in solar energy collectors and applications. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 2007; 1: 23-32.
Laforgia D, Colangelo G, Milanese M, De Risi A. Heat transfer medium with nanofluid for a thermodynamic study system. German Patent EP2557373A1, 2007.
Kametani T. Solar heat collector method and devices. Japanese Patent 2010144957A, 2010.
Kuramoto T, Marumoto K, Mo T. Solar heat collector and solar heat utilization devices having the same. Japanese Patent 2007205645A, 2007.
Price H, Lupfert E, Kearney D, Zarza E, Cohen G, Gee R. Advances in parabolic trough solar power technology. Solar Energy Eng 2002; 124: 109-25.
Schuknecht N, White D, Hoste G. Sunshot initiative-high concentration- low cost parabolic trough system for base load CSP. Energy Efficiency Renewable Energy 2014. Available at: [Accessed December 12 3016].
Richter C, Teske S, Short R. Concentrating solar power global outlook 09. Greenpeace International/European Solar Thermal Electricity Association (ESTELA)/IEA SolarPACES, Report 2009 May.
Le M. Sunshot initiative-2014 portfolio. US Department of Energy 2014; pp. 1-124.
Ravi KK, Reddy KS. Numerical investigation of energy-efficient receiver for solar parabolic trough concentrator. Heat Transf Eng 2008; 29: 961-72.
Ravi KK, Reddy KS. Thermal analysis of solar parabolic trough with porous disc receiver. Appl Energy 2009; 86: 1-12.
Munoz J, Abanades A. Analysis of internal helically finned tubes for parabolic trough design by CFD Tools. Appl Energy 2011; 88: 4139-49.
Cheng ZD, He YL, Cui FQ. Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement by unilateral longitudinal vortex generators inside parabolic trough solar receivers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2012; 55: 5631-41.
Mwesigye A, Bello-Ochende T, Meyer JP. Heat transfer and thermodynamic performance of a parabolic trough receiver with centrally placed perforated plate inserts. Appl Energy 2014; 136: 989-93.
Schweitzer A, Schiel W, Birkle M, Nava P, Riffelmann K, Wohlfahrt A. Ultimate trough-fabrication, erection and commissioning of the world’s largest parabolic trough collector. Energ Proc 2014; 49: 1848-57.
Javadi FS, Saidur R, Kamalisarvestani M. Investigating performance improvement of solar collectors by using nanofluids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013; 28: 232-45.
Taylor AR, Phelan EP, Otanicar PT, Walker AC, Nguyen M, Trimble S. Applicability of nanofluids in high flux solar collectors. Renew Sustain Energy 2011; 023104: 1-15.
Sokhansefat T, Kasaeian AB, Kowsary F. Heat transfer enhancement in parabolic trough collector tube using Al2O3/Synthetic oil nanofluid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014; 33: 636-44.
Keblinski P, Eastman JA, Cahill DG. Nanofluids for thermal transport. Mater Today 2005; 8: 36-44.
Rashmi W, Khalid M, Ong SS, Saidur R. Preparation, thermo-physical properties and heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Mater Res Express 2014; 1(032001): 1-48.
Aladag B, Halelfadl S, Doner N, Mare T, Duret S, Estelle P. Experimental investigations of the viscosity of nanofluids at low temperatures. Appl Energy 2012; 97: 876-80.
Jang SP, Hwang KS, Lee JH, Kim JH, Lee Stephen BH, Choi US. Lee, Stephen BH, Choi US. Effective thermal conductivities and viscosities of water based nanofluids containing Al2O3 with low concentration. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology. 2007 Aug 2-5; Hong Kong.
Xie H, Wang J, Xi T, Liu Y, Ai F, Wu Q. Thermal conductivity enhancement of suspensions containing nano-sized alumina particles. J Appl Phys 2002; 91: 4568-72.
Mwesigye A, Josua MP. Optimal thermal and thermodynamic performance of a solar parabolic trough receiver with different nanofluids and at different concentration ratios. Appl Energy 2017; 193: 393-413.
Mwesigye A, Huan Z, Meyer JP. Thermal performance and entropy generation analysis of a high concentration ratio parabolic trough solar collector with Cu-Therminol VP-1 nanofluid. Energy Convers Manage 2016; 120: 449-65.
Mwesigye A, Huan Z, Meyer JP. Thermodynamic optimisation of the performance of a parabolic trough receiver using synthetic oil-Al2O3 nanofluid. Appl Energy 2015; 156: 398-412.
Duffie JA, Beckman WA. Solar engineering of thermal processes. USA: John Wiley and Sons 1991; pp. 1-468.
Goswami DY. Principles of Solzar Engineering. USA: Taylor and Francis 2003.
Sukhatme SP. Solar energy principles of thermal collection and storage. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company 1999.
Kasaeian A, Eshghi AT, Sameti M. A review on the applications of nanofluids in solar energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 43: 584-98.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Published on: 28 January, 2020
Page: [206 - 221]
Pages: 16
DOI: 10.2174/1872210513666190410123503
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 14