Recent Advances in Cone-beam CT in Oral Medicine

Author(s): Delphine Maret*, Jean-Noel Vergnes, Ove A. Peters, Christine Peters, Karim Nasr, Paul Monsarrat

Journal Name: Current Medical Imaging
Formerly: Current Medical Imaging Reviews

Volume 16 , Issue 5 , 2020

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: The cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) technology has continuously evolved since its appearance in oral medicine in the early 2000s.

Objectives: To present recent advances in CBCT in oral medicine: i) selection of recent and consensual evidence-based sources, ii) structured summary of the information based on an iterative framework and iii) compliance with ethical, public health and patient-centered concerns.

Main Findings: We will focus on technological advances, such as sensors and reconstruction algorithms used to improve the constant quality of the image and dosimetry. CBCT examination is now performed in almost all disciplines of oral medicine: currently, the main clinical disciplines that use CBCT acquisitions are endodontics and oral surgery, with clearly defined indications. Periodontology and ear, nose and throat medicine are more recent fields of application. For a given application and indication, the smallest possible field of view must be used. One of the major challenges in contemporary healthcare is ensuring that technological developments do not take precedence over admitted standards of care. The entire volume should be reviewed in full, with a systematic approach. All findings are noted in the patient’s record and explained to the patient, including incidental findings. This presupposes the person reviewing the images is sufficiently trained to interpret such images, inform the patient and organize the clinical pathway, with referrals to other medical or oral medicine specialties as needed.

Conclusion: A close collaboration between dentists, medical physicists, radiologists, radiographers and engineers is critical for all aspects of CBCT technology.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography, radiology, oral medicine, stomatognathic diseases, incidental findings, patientcentered care.

[1]
Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Pinheiro LR, Priaminiarti M, Sales MAO. The emerging role of maxillofacial radiology in the diagnosis and management of patients with complex periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 2017; 74(1): 116-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/prd.12193] [PMID: 28429477]
[2]
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(1): 75-80.
[PMID: 16480609]
[3]
Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(9): 1558-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050586] [PMID: 9866761]
[4]
Hatcher DC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141(141): 3S-6S.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0359] [PMID: 20884933]
[5]
Setzer FC, Hinckley N, Kohli MR, Karabucak B. A survey of cone-beam computed tomographic use among endodontic practitioners in the United States. J Endod 2017; 43(5): 699-704.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.021] [PMID: 28292601]
[6]
Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an overview of published indications and clinical usage in United States academic centers and oral and maxillofacial surgery practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(4): 668-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.018] [PMID: 26611374]
[7]
Hol C, Hellén-Halme K, Torgersen G, Nilsson M, Møystad A. How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73(3): 195-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.979866] [PMID: 25415368]
[8]
Parashar V, Whaites E, Monsour P, Chaudhry J, Geist JR. Cone beam computed tomography in dental education: a survey of US, UK, and Australian dental schools. J Dent Educ 2012; 76(11): 1443-7.
[PMID: 23144479]
[9]
Hanzelka T, Dusek J, Ocasek F, et al. Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116(6): 769-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.010] [PMID: 24237728]
[10]
Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 2012; 57(Suppl. 1): 46-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x] [PMID: 22376097]
[11]
Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: A review. Phys Med 2015; 31(8): 844-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.004] [PMID: 26481816]
[12]
Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(4): S130-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.015] [PMID: 20381753]
[13]
Macleod I, Heath N. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental practice. Dent Update 2008; 35(9): 590-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/denu.2008.35.9.590] [PMID: 19065875]
[14]
Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: what dental educators and learners should know. J Dent Educ 2012; 76(11): 1437-42.
[PMID: 23144478]
[15]
Razavi T, Palmer RM, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21(7): 718-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01905.x] [PMID: 20636726]
[16]
Brüllmann D, Schulze RKW. Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(1) 20140204
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140204] [PMID: 25168812]
[17]
Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(1) 20140224
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140224] [PMID: 25263643]
[18]
Chakeres DW. Clinical significance of partial volume averaging of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1984; 5(3): 297-302.
[PMID: 6426283]
[19]
Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005]
[20]
Kwong JC, Palomo JM, Landers MA, Figueroa A, Hans MG. Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133(2): 317-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.053] [PMID: 18249300]
[21]
Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42(8) 20120443
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120443] [PMID: 23818529]
[22]
Kim DW, Han JC, Yun S, Kim HK. Aging of imaging properties of a CMOS flat-panel detector for dental cone-beam computed tomography. J Instrum 2017; 12 P01005
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01005]
[23]
Cha BK, Jeon S, Seo C-W. X-ray performance of a wafer-scale CMOS flat panel imager for applications in medical imaging and nondestructive testing. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 2016; 831: 404-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.04.117]
[24]
Inglese J, Bothorel S, Loustauneau V, Rankin-Parobek D. Dental imaging with photon-counting detector 2017. Available from:. https://www.google.com/patents/US9743893
[25]
Panetta D. Advances in X-ray detectors for clinical and preclinical computed tomography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 2016; 809: 2-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.10.034]
[26]
Inglese J, Schildkraut J. Volume image reconstruction using data from multiple energy spectra 2016. Available from:. http://www.google.com/patents/US9269168
[27]
Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40(5): 265-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039] [PMID: 21697151]
[28]
Liu W, Rong J, Gao P, Liao Q, Lu H. Algorithm for x-ray beam hardening and scatter correction in low-dose cone-beam CT: phantom studies. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics. San Diego, California, United States; SPIE 2016; p. 978332.
[29]
Park JC, Zhang H, Chen Y, et al. Priori mask guided image reconstruction (p-MGIR) for ultra-low dose cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60(21): 8505-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/21/8505] [PMID: 26485492]
[30]
Cao Q, Zbijewski W, Sisniega A, Yorkston J, Siewerdsen JH, Stayman JW. Multiresolution iterative reconstruction in high-resolution extremity cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61(20): 7263-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/20/7263] [PMID: 27694701]
[31]
Du Y, Yu G, Xiang X, Wang X. GPU accelerated voxel-driven forward projection for iterative reconstruction of cone-beam CT. Biomed Eng Online 2017; 16(1): 2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0293-8] [PMID: 28086901]
[32]
Boas FE, Fleischmann D. CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging Med 2012; 4: 229-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/iim.12.13]
[33]
Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Patient movement and motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography of the dentomaxillofacial region: a systematic literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121(4): 425-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.11.019] [PMID: 26972541]
[34]
Queiroz PM, Rovaris K, Gaêta-Araujo H, et al. Influence of artifact reduction tools in micro-computed tomography images for endodontic research. J Endod 2017; 43(12): 2108-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.024] [PMID: 29033091]
[35]
Gu J, Bae W, Ye JC. Translational motion correction algorithm for truncated cone-beam CT using opposite projections. J XRay Sci Technol 2017; 2017: 1-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-16231]
[36]
Spin-Neto R, Matzen LH, Schropp L, Sørensen TS, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Accuracy of video observation and a three-dimensional head tracking system for detecting and quantifying robot-simulated head movements in cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123(6): 721-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.010] [PMID: 28412232]
[37]
Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(1) 20140197
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140197] [PMID: 25224586]
[38]
Choi E, Ford NL. Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(6) 20150018
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150018] [PMID: 25785822]
[39]
Bogdanich W, McGinty J. Radiation worries for children in dentists’ chairs, 2010. Available from:. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/us/23scan.html
[40]
Widmann G, Al-Shawaf R, Schullian P, Al-Sadhan R, Hörmann R, Al-Ekrish AA. Effect of ultra-low doses, ASIR and MBIR on density and noise levels of MDCT images of dental implant sites. Eur Radiol 2017; 27(5): 2225-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4588-8] [PMID: 27655306]
[41]
Goulston R, Davies J, Horner K, Murphy F. Dose optimization by altering the operating potential and tube current exposure time product in dental cone beam CT: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45(3) 20150254
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150254] [PMID: 26732433]
[42]
Ludlow JB, Walker C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144(6): 802-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.013] [PMID: 24286904]
[43]
Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, Panmekiate S. Determination of size-specific exposure settings in dental cone-beam CT. Eur Radiol 2017; 27(1): 279-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4353-z] [PMID: 27108296]
[44]
Pauwels R, Zhang G, Theodorakou C, et al. SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation. Br J Radiol 2014; 87(1042) 20130654
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130654] [PMID: 25189417]
[45]
Pauwels R, Silkosessak O, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, Panmekiate S. A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43(5) 20140059
[46]
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2012; 143(8): 899-902.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0295] [PMID: 22855905]
[47]
European Commission. Guidelines on CBCT for dental and maxillofacial radiology | SEDENTEXCT 2012. Available from:. http://www.sedentexct.eu/content/guidelines-cbct-dental-and-maxillofacial-radiology
[48]
Kamburoğlu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol 2015; 7(6): 128-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128] [PMID: 26120381]
[49]
Oser DG, Henson BR, Shiang EY, Finkelman MD, Amato RB. Incidental findings in small field of view cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2017; 43(6): 901-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.033] [PMID: 28359665]
[50]
Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(1): 114-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001] [PMID: 17178504]
[51]
de Paula-Silva FWG, Wu M-K, Leonardo MR, da Silva LAB, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod 2009; 35(7): 1009-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.006] [PMID: 19567324]
[52]
Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008; 34(3): 273-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023] [PMID: 18291274]
[53]
Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Reibel J, Wenzel A, Kirkevang L-L. Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46(7) 20170210
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170210] [PMID: 28707526]
[54]
Sirotheau CPF, Paiva FF, Souza de JA, et al. Nonendodontic lesions misdiagnosed as apical periodontitis lesions: series of case reports and review of literature. J Endod 2014; 40(1): 16-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.021] [PMID: 24331985]
[55]
Guo J, Simon JH, Sedghizadeh P, Soliman ON, Chapman T, Enciso R. Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of using cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosing periapical cysts from granulomas. J Endod 2013; 39(12): 1485-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.019] [PMID: 24238434]
[56]
Mota de Almeida FJ, Huumonen S, Molander A, Öhman A, Kvist T. Computed tomography (CT) in the selection of treatment for root-filled maxillary molars with apical periodontitis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45(5) 20150391
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150391] [PMID: 26985980]
[57]
Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Day P, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28(2): 88-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01125.x] [PMID: 22409417]
[58]
Cohenca N, Silberman A. Contemporary imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic dental injuries: A review. Dent Traumatol 2017; 33(5): 321-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edt.12339] [PMID: 28317333]
[59]
Huumonen S, Kvist T, Gröndahl K, Molander A. Diagnostic value of computed tomography in re-treatment of root fillings in maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2006; 39(10): 827-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01157.x] [PMID: 16948669]
[60]
Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, Azevedo B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in detecting small periapical lesions. J Endod 2012; 38(7): 965-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.001] [PMID: 22703662]
[61]
Yoshioka T, Kikuchi I, Adorno CG, Suda H. Periapical bone defects of root filled teeth with persistent lesions evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011; 44(3): 245-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01814.x] [PMID: 21166825]
[62]
Estrela C, Alencar AH, Kitten GT, Vencio EF, Gava E. Mesenchymal stem cells in the dental tissues: perspectives for tissue regeneration. Braz Dent J 2011; 22(2): 91-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000200001] [PMID: 21537580]
[63]
Decurcio DA, Bueno MR, de Alencar AHG, Porto OCL, Azevedo BC, Estrela C. Effect of root canal filling materials on dimensions of cone-beam computed tomography images. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20(2): 260-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200023] [PMID: 22666847]
[64]
Bueno MR, Estrela C, De Figueiredo JAP, Azevedo BC. Map-reading strategy to diagnose root perforations near metallic intracanal posts by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2011; 37(1): 85-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.006] [PMID: 21146084]
[65]
Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. J Endod 2011; 37(2): 151-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.014] [PMID: 21238794]
[66]
Dawood A, Brown J, Sauret-Jackson V, Purkayastha S. Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41(1): 70-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/16421849] [PMID: 22184628]
[67]
Schloss T, Sonntag D, Kohli MR, Setzer FC. A comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional healing assessment after endodontic surgery using cone-beam computed tomographic volumes or periapical radiographs. J Endod 2017; 43(7): 1072-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.007] [PMID: 28527841]
[68]
von Arx T, Jensen SS, Bornstein MM. Changes of root length and root-to-crown ratio after apical surgery: an analysis by using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2015; 41(9): 1424-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.001] [PMID: 25958177]
[69]
Cevidanes LHS, Boen V, Paniagua B, Styner M, Nguyen T. Orthodontic and orthognathic surgery planning using CBCT. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2016.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119004370.ch8]
[70]
Rios HF, Borgnakke WS, Benavides E. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in management of patients requiring dental implants: an American academy of periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 2017; 88(10): 946-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160548] [PMID: 28967330]
[71]
Bornstein MM, Horner K, Jacobs R. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73(1): 51-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/prd.12161] [PMID: 28000270]
[72]
Magill D, Beckmann N, Felice MA, Yoo T, Luo M, Mupparapu M. Investigation of dental cone-beam CT pixel data and a modified method for conversion to Hounsfield unit (HU). Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol 2017; 2017 20170321
[73]
Talaat W, Al Bayatti S, Al Kawas S. CBCT analysis of bony changes associated with temporomandibular disorders. Cranio 2016; 34(2): 88-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2151090315Y.0000000002] [PMID: 25672907]
[74]
Ma R-H, Yin S, Li G. The detection accuracy of cone beam CT for osseous defects of the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 34714.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34714] [PMID: 27708375]
[75]
Al-Saleh MAQ, Alsufyani NA, Saltaji H, Jaremko JL, Major PW. MRI and CBCT image registration of temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 45(1): 30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0144-4] [PMID: 27164975]
[76]
Kim DM, Bassir SH. When is cone-beam computed tomography imaging appropriate for diagnostic inquiry in the management of inflammatory periodontitis? An American academy of periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 2017; 88(10): 978-98.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2017.160505] [PMID: 28967334]
[77]
Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(1) 20140282
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140282] [PMID: 25358833]
[78]
Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG. Cone beam computed tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Aust Dent J 2017; 62(Suppl. 1): 33-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12479] [PMID: 28297089]
[79]
Momany SM, AlJamal G, Shugaa-Addin B, Khader YS. Cone beam computed tomography analysis of upper airway measurements in patients with obstructive sleep Apnea. Am J Med Sci 2016; 352(4): 376-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2016.07.014] [PMID: 27776719]
[80]
Zimmerman JN, Lee J, Pliska BT. Reliability of upper pharyngeal airway assessment using dental CBCT: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2017; 39(5): 489-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw079] [PMID: 27999121]
[81]
Chen H, Li Y, Reiber JH, et al. Analyses of aerodynamic characteristics of the oropharynx applying CBCT: obstructive sleep apnea patients versus control subjects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 2017 0238
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170238] [PMID: 29076751]
[82]
Hodez C, Griffaton-Taillandier C, Bensimon I. Cone-beam imaging: applications in ENT. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011; 128(2): 65-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2010.10.008] [PMID: 21459066]
[83]
Şeker E, Ozcelik TB, Rathi N, Yilmaz B. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115(1): 47-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.006] [PMID: 26518986]
[84]
Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 2015; 24(4): 313-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12218] [PMID: 25220390]
[85]
Flügge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J, Hassan B, Nelson K, Wismeijer D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28(9): 1113-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12925] [PMID: 27440381]
[86]
Inbarajan A, Banu F, Tv P, Kumar A, Seenivasan M. Pre-surgical provisional prosthesis for immediate non-occlusal-loaded flapless implant. Cureus 2017; 9(6) e1345
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1345] [PMID: 28713661]
[87]
Aslanidou K, Kau CH, Vlachos C, Saleh TA. The fabrication of a customized occlusal splint based on the merging of dynamic jaw tracking records, cone beam computed tomography, and CAD-CAM digital impression. J Orthod Sci 2017; 6(3): 104-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_61_16] [PMID: 28717635]
[88]
Alsufyani NA, Al-Saleh MAQ, Major PW. CBCT assessment of upper airway changes and treatment outcomes of obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review. Sleep Breath 2013; 17(3): 911-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-012-0799-7] [PMID: 23344828]
[89]
van der Meer WJ, Vissink A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K III. 3D Computer aided treatment planning in endodontics. J Dent 2016; 45: 67-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.007] [PMID: 26627596]
[90]
Patel S, Aldowaisan A, Dawood A. A novel method for soft tissue retraction during periapical surgery using 3D technology: a case report. Int Endod J 2017; 50(8): 813-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12701] [PMID: 27632716]
[91]
Mirković S, Budak I, Puskar T, et al. Application of modern computer-aided technologies in the production of individual bone graft: A case report. Vojnosanit Pregl 2015; 72(12): 1126-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/VSP140915117M] [PMID: 26898039]
[92]
Zinser M, Zoeller J. Computer-Designed splints for surgical transfer of 3D Orthognathic planning. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31(5): 474-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1565010] [PMID: 26579863]
[93]
Evans ZP, Renne WG, Bacro TR, Mennito AS, Ludlow ME, Lecholop MK. Anatomic customization of root-analog dental implants with cone-beam CT and CAD/CAM fabrication: a cadaver based pilot evaluation. J Oral Implantol 2017; 2017: 1-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00090] [PMID: 29064779]
[94]
Naumovich SS, Naumovich SA, Goncharenko VG. Three-dimensional reconstruction of teeth and jaws based on segmentation of CT images using watershed transformation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44(4) 20140313
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140313] [PMID: 25564886]
[95]
Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet J-P, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 2010; 36(7): 1187-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.029] [PMID: 20630296]
[96]
Stoetzer M, Nickel F, Rana M, et al. Advances in assessing the volume of odontogenic cysts and tumors in the mandible: a retrospective clinical trial. Head Face Med 2013; 9: 14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-9-14] [PMID: 23601144]
[97]
Lee RJ, Weissheimer A, Pham J, et al. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147(1): 132-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.010] [PMID: 25533080]
[98]
Jiang F, Kula K, Chen J. Estimating the location of the center of resistance of canines. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(3): 365-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/051215-322.1] [PMID: 26401827]
[99]
Stimmelmayr M, Denk K, Erdelt K, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of four cone beam computed tomography devices using 3D implant-planning software. Int J Comput Dent 2017; 20(1): 21-34.
[PMID: 28294203]
[100]
Joda T, Ferrari M, Braegger U. A digital approach for one-step formation of the supra-implant emergence profile with an individualized CAD/CAM healing abutment. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60(3): 220-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.005] [PMID: 26868927]
[101]
Marroquin TY, Karkhanis S, Kvaal SI, Vasudavan S, Kruger E, Tennant M. Age estimation in adults by dental imaging assessment systematic review. Forensic Sci Int 2017; 275: 203-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.03.007] [PMID: 28410514]
[102]
Galibourg A, Dumoncel J, Telmon N, Calvet A, Michetti J, Maret D. Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 14(1) 20170220
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170220] [PMID: 28937285]
[103]
Apelian N, Vergnes JN, Hovey R, Bedos C. How can we provide person-centred dental care? Br Dent J 2017; 223(6): 419-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.806] [PMID: 28937118]
[104]
Makanjee CR, Bergh A-M, Hoffmann WA. Healthcare provider and patient perspectives on diagnostic imaging investigations. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2015; 7(1): 7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.801] [PMID: 26245604]
[105]
O’Sullivan JW, Muntinga T, Grigg S, Ioannidis JPA. Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings: umbrella review. BMJ 2018; 361: k2387.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2387] [PMID: 29914908]
[106]
Scarfe WC. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomographic images: a Pandora’s box? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 117(5): 537-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.002] [PMID: 24508511]
[107]
Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38(4): 187-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/74941012] [PMID: 19372107]
[108]
Edwards R, Altalibi M, Flores-Mir C. The frequency and nature of incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomographic scans of the head and neck region: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144(2): 161-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0095] [PMID: 23372132]
[109]
Maret D, Telmon N, Treil J, Caron P, Nabet C. Pituitary adenoma as an incidental finding in dental radiology: a case report. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160(4): 290-1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/L14-5004-4] [PMID: 24727848]
[110]
Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care 2013; 2013 13e010
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.886] [PMID: 23687482]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 16
ISSUE: 5
Year: 2020
Page: [553 - 564]
Pages: 12
DOI: 10.2174/1573405615666190114152003

Article Metrics

PDF: 23
HTML: 4
EPUB: 1
PRC: 1