A Tutorial and Performance Analysis on ENVI Tools for SAR Image Despeckling

Author(s): Mohammad R. Khosravi*, Babak Bahri-Aliabadi, Seyed R. Salari, Sadegh Samadi, Habib Rostami, Vahid Karimi

Journal Name: Current Signal Transduction Therapy

Volume 15 , Issue 2 , 2020


Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: The presence of speckle noise in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images makes the images of low quality in terms of textural features and spatial resolution which are required for processing issues such as image classification and clustering. Already, there are many adaptive filters to remove noise in SAR images. ENVI software is a fully applicable tool for this purpose which has a good library including several filters in the classes of adaptive, orderstatistics and non-linear filters.

Materials and Methods: In this study, the toolbox of ENVI is reviewed, analyzed and then numerically evaluated based on several single-band images along with multi-band polarimetric SAR (Pol-SAR) images achieved from SAR sensors such as TerraSAR-X. For evaluation, two metrics including Equivalent Number of Looks (ENL) and Edge Preservation Index (EPI) are used which show the ability of the filters in preserving jointly spatial/textural features based on general information and edges quality, respectively.

Results: It is notable that both metrics illustrate that some classic filters are better in comparison to newer filters.

Conclusion: The experiments can help us in selecting a better filter towards our aims. In this respect, attention to the results of commercial filters of ENVI software and their analysis can guide us to find the best case in order to process commercial data of SAR sensors in the applications of environmental monitoring, geo-science studies, industrial usages and so on.

Keywords: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), speckle noise, denoising, ENVI, radio imaging, remote sensing of environment.

[1]
Lopes A, Touzi R, Nezry E. Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 1990; 28: 992-1000.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.62623]
[2]
Shi Z, Fung K. A comparison of digital speckle filters. Proceedings of IGARSS. 2129-33.
[3]
Lee J. Speckle suppression and analysis for synthetic aperture radar. Opt Eng 1986; 25: 636-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.7973877]
[4]
Lee J, Jurkevich I. Speckle filtering of synthetic aperture radar images: A review. Remote Sens Rev 1994; 8: 313-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757259409532206]
[5]
Lee J. Digital image smoothing and the sigma filter. Comp Graph Image Process 1983; 24(2): 255-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(83)90047-6]
[6]
Rao P, Vidyadhar M, Rao M, Venkataratnam L. An adaptive filler for speckle suppression in synthetic aperture radar images. Int J Remote Sens 1995; 16(5): 877-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954449]
[7]
Eliason EM. Adaptive box filters for removal of random noise from digital images. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 1990; 56(4): 453-8.
[8]
Lopes A, Laur H, Nezry E. Statistical distribution and texture in multi-look and complex SAR images. IGARSS 1990; 1990: 2427-30.
[9]
Goodman JW. Some fundamental properties of speckle. J Opt Soc Am 1976; 66: 1145-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.66.001145]
[10]
Walessa M, Datcu M. Model-based despeckling and information extraction from SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 2000; 38(5): 2258-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.868883]
[11]
Lee JS. Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1980; 2(2): 165-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1980.4766994] [PMID: 21868887]
[12]
Salari R. Evaluation of statistical and nonlinear adaptive filters performance for noise reduction of SAR images. International Congress of Electrical Engineering. Computer Science and Information Technology 2015; 3: 352-62.
[13]
Baraldi A, Parmigiani F. A refined gamma MAP SAR speckle filter with improved geometrical adaptivity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 1995; 33(5): 1245-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.469489]
[14]
Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC. A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1982; 4(2): 157-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1982.4767223] [PMID: 21869022]
[15]
Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P. Adaptive restoration of images with speckle. IEEE Transactions Acoustic Speech Signal Processing 1987; 35: 373-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165131]
[16]
Lopes A. Maximum a posteriori filtering and first order texture models in SAR images. IGARSS 1990; 90: 2409-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1990.689026]
[17]
Gagnon L, Jouan A. . Speckle filtering of SAR images: A comparative study between complex-wavelet- based and standard filters. SPIE proceedings 2010; 80-91.
[18]
Moreira A. Improved multi-looktechniques applied to SAR and SCANSAR imagery. IEEE Transactions Geoscience Remote Sensors 1991; 29(4): 529-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.135814]
[19]
Chumning H, Huadong G, Changlin W. Edge preservation evaluation of digital speckle filters. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2002; 2471-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026581]
[20]
Hou B. SAR Image despeckling based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 2012; 5(3): 809-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2196680]
[21]
Li GT. SAR Image Despeckling using a space-domain filter with alterable window. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2013; 10(2): 263-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2012.2200875]
[22]
Khosravi MR. An introduction to ENVI tools for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image despeckling and quantitative comparison of denoising filters. IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering 2017; 212-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSI.2017.8392114]
[23]
Wang W, Liu X, Zhang W. A downsampled SAR-BM3D despeckling approach for single-look SAR images in high resolution. J Comp & Commun 2016; 4: 126-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2016.415012]
[24]
Abdikan S. Exploring image fusion of ALOS/PALSAR data and LANDSAT data to differentiate forest area. Geocarto Int 2018; 33(1): 21-37.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1222635]
[25]
Khosravi MR, Samadi S, Akbarzadeh O. Determining the optimal range of angle tracking radars. IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering 2017; 3132-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSI.2017.8392303]
[26]
Khosravi MR, Yazdi M. A lossless data hiding scheme for medical images using a hybrid solution based on IBRW error histogram computation and quartered interpolation with greedy weights. Neural Comput Appl 2018; 30(7): 2017-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3489-y]
[27]
Khosravi MR, Rostami H, Samadi S. Enhancing the binary watermark-based data hiding scheme using an interpolation-based approach for optical remote sensing images. Int J Agric Environ Inf Syst 2018; 9(2): 53-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJAEIS.2018040104]
[28]
Khosravi MR, Sharif-Yazd M, Moghimi MK, Keshavarz A, Rostami H, Mansouri S. MRF-based multispectral image fusion using an adaptive approach based on edge-guided interpolation. J Geogr Inf Syst 2017; 9(2): 114-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2017.92008]
[29]
Karimi V, Tashk A. Age and gender estimation by using hybrid facial features. Telecommunications Forum 2012; 1725-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR.2012.6419560]
[30]
Karimi V, Norouzi Y. Target Detection enhancement based on waveform design in cognitive radar. Electronics New Zealand Conference (ENZCon). 40-5.
[31]
Karimi V, Mohseni R, Norouzi Y, Dehghani MJ. Waveform design for cognitive radar with deterministic extended targets in the presence of clutter Int J Commun Net Sys Sci 2016; 352-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijcns.2016.96023]
[32]
Karimi V, Mohseni R. Radar waveform design based on OFDM signals for cognitive radar application. The 24th Int'l Conf on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications 2018; 168-9.
[33]
Tavallali P, Yazdi M, Khosravi MR. Robust cascaded skin detector based on AdaBoost. Multimedia Tools Appl 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6385-7]
[34]
Kala R, Deepa P. Adaptive hexagonal fuzzy hybrid filter for Rician noise removal in MRI images. Neural Comput Appl 2018; 29(8): 237-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2953-4]


open access plus

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 15
ISSUE: 2
Year: 2020
Published on: 04 October, 2018
Page: [215 - 222]
Pages: 8
DOI: 10.2174/1574362413666181005101315

Article Metrics

PDF: 31
HTML: 6
EPUB: 1
PRC: 1