Bond Strength of Ceramic and Metal Orthodontic Brackets to Aged Resinbased Composite Restorations

Author(s): Alvaro Della Bona*, Ricardo Kochenborger, Luís A. Di Guida

Journal Name: Current Dentistry

Volume 1 , Issue 1 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Background: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation. Thus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate protocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.

Objective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets bonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.

Methods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20) as follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38% phosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed bur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to ACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens were stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.

Results: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when using the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because of different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution generated complex failures.

Conclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated, sufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.

Keywords: Resin-based composite, ceramics, metals, aged biomaterials, ACR, orthodontic.

Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171-8.
Gange P. Bonding in today’s orthodontic practice. J Clin Orthod 2006; 40: 361-7.
Evans LS, McGrory KR, English JD, et al. A comparison of shear bond strengths among different self-etching primers. Tex Dent J 2009; 126(4): 312-9.
Sfondrini MF, Calderoni G, Vitale MC, Gandini P, Scribante A. Is laser conditioning a valid alternative to conventional etching for aesthetic bracket. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2018; 19(1): 61-6.
Costa AR, Vedovello-Filho M, Correr AB, et al. Bonding orthodontic brackets to enamel using experimental composites with an iodonium salt. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 297-302.
Gupta SP, Shrestha BK. Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2018; 10: 61-7.
Pazzini CA, Pereira LJ, Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge J, Aparecida da Silva T, Paiva SM. Nickel-free vs conventional braces for patients allergic to nickel: gingival and blood parameters during and after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150(6): 1014-9.
Godard M, Deuve B, Lopez I, Hippolyte MP, Barthélemi S. Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel. Int Orthod 2017; 15(3): 388-404.
Tonus JL, Manfroi FB, Borges GA, Grigolo EC, Helegda S, Spohr AM. Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22(1): 82-8.
Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 87-101.
Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, Santos PH, Briso AL, Fagundes TC. Influence of mechanical and chemical degradation in the surface roughness, gloss, and color of microhybrid composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(4): 283-8.
Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, Campos RA, Santos PH, Machado LS, Fagundes TC. Repair ability of aged resin composites mediated by different restorative system. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2016; 29(1): 7-13.
Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A. Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology 2018; 106(2): 171-80.
Shafiei F, Berahman N, Niazi E. Effect of finishing time on microleakage at the composite-repair interface. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 497-504.
Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 391-6.
Barbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior J.F., Conti ACCF. The association between patient’s compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod 2018; 19(1): 11-5.
Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 285-90.
Evans LJ, Peters C, Flickinger C, et al. A comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets using various light sources, light guides, and cure times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 510-5.
Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, et al. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 141-8.
Baka ZM, Akin M, Ileri Z, Basciftci FA. Effects of remineralization procedures on shear bond strengths of brackets bonded to demineralized enamel surfaces with self-etch systems. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(4): 661-7.
Claudino D, Kuga MC, Belizário L, Pereira JR. Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(3): e248-51.
Koll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolf MS. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 89: 476-9.
Khanehmasjedi M, Naseri MA, Khanehmasjedi S, Basir L. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination. J Chin Med Assoc 2017; 80(2): 103-8.
Chen CS, Hsu ML, Chang KD, et al. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 1071-7.
Fleming PS, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Pandis N. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143(4)(Suppl.): S92-S103.
Jurišić S, Jurišić G, Jurić H. Influence of adhesives and methods of enamel pretreatment on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015; 49(4): 269-74.
Gungor AY, Alkis H, Turkkahraman H. Shear bond strengths of brackets bonded with a new self-adhering resin composite. Int J Artif Organs 2016; 39(8): 431-4.
Wongsamut W, Satrawaha S, Wayakanon K. Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets. J Orthod Sci 2017; 6(4): 129-35.
Zhang ZC, Qian YF. Yang YM1, Feng QP, Shen G. Bond strength of metal brackets bonded to a silica-based ceramic with light-cured adhesive: Influence of various surface treatment methods. J Orofac Orthop 2016; 77(5): 366-72.
Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123(5): 540-6.
Buyuk SK, Kucukekenci AS. Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials. Angle Orthod 2018; 88(2): 221-6.
Park SB, Son WS, Ko CC, et al. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent Mater J 2009; 28(6): 730-4.
Iliadi A, Baumgartner S, Athanasiou AE, Eliades T, Eliades G. Effect of intraoral aging on the setting status of resin composite and glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145(4): 425-33.
Rodrigues Junior SA, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 442-51.
Della Bona A, Van Noort R. Shear versus tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1591-6.
Gittner R, Müller-Hartwich R, Engel S, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2. J Orofac Orthop 2012; 73: 49-57.
Bakhadher W, Halawany H, Talic N, Abraham N, Jacob V. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets - A review of in vitro studies. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2015; 58(2): 43-8.
Ousehal L, El Aouame A, Rachdy Z, Benkiran G. Comparison of the efficacy of a conventional primer and a self-etching primer. Int Orthod 2016; 14(2): 195-205.
Eliades T, Brantley WA. Orthodontics materials, scientific and clinical aspects. Stuttgart: Thieme 2001; p. 310.
Boscato N, Della Bona A, Del Bel Cury A. Influence of ceramic pre-treatments on tensile bond strength and mode of failure of resin bonded to ceramics. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 103-8.
Knox J, Jones ML, Hubsch P, Middleton J, Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different loadcases using the finite element method of stress analysis. J Orthod 2000; 27(1): 39-46.
Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34(5): 610-7.
Bayram M, Yesilyurt C, Kusgöz A, Ulker M, Nur M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(2): 174-9.
Demirtas HK, Akin M, Ileri Z, Basciftci FA. Shear-bond-strength of orthodontic brackets to aged nano-hybrid composite-resin surfaces using different surface preparation. Dent Mater J 2015; 34(1): 86-90.
Swartz ML. Limitations of in vitro orthodontic bond strength testing. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41: 207-10.
Mirzakouchaki B, Shirazi S, Sharghi R, Shirazi S, Moghimi M, Shahrbaf S. Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with conventional acid-etch and self-etch primer systems: An in-vivo study. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8(1): e38-43.
Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, et al. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 65-70.
Jurubeba JEP, Costa AR, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al. Influence of thermal cycles number on bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J 2017; 28(2): 206-9.
Bishara SE, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, et al. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 400-4.
Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, et al. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 74-82.
Smith DC, Maijer R. Improvements in bracket base design. Am J Orthod 1983; 83(4): 277-81.
Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122(3): 260-6.
Costenoble A, Vennat E, Attal JP, Dursun E. Bond strength and interfacial morphology of orthodontic brackets bonded to eroded enamel treated with calcium silicate-sodium phosphate salts or resin infiltration. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(6): 909-16.
Mirzakouchaki B, Kimyai S, Hydari M, Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki-Boroujeni P. Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17(1): e164-70.
Arash V, Naghipour F, Ravadgar M, Karkhah A, Barati MS. Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives. Electron Physician 2017; 9(1): 3584-91.
Daratsianos N, Musabegovic E, Reimann S, et al. The influence of cyclic shear fatigue on the bracket-adhesive-enamel complex: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 506-13.
Faria e Silva AL, Covell DA Jr, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS. Effectiveness of high irradiance for short-time exposures on polymerization of composite under metal brackets. Angle Orthod 2017; 87(6): 834-40.
Seeliger JH, Botzenhart UU, Gedrange T, Kozak K, Stepien L, Machoy M. Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2017; 62(4): 415-20.
Baeshen H, Alturki BN, Albishi WW, Alsadi FM, El-Tubaigy KM. Mechanical and physical properties of two different resin-based materials: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(10): 905-10.
Hellak A, Ebeling J, Schauseil M, Stein S, Roggendorf M, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 6307107.
Montasser MA. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(4): 402-6.
Jain M, Shetty S, Mogra S, Shetty VS, Dhakar N. Determination of optimum adhesive thickness using varying degrees of force application with light-cured adhesive and its effect on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Orthodontics (Chic) 2013; 14(1): e40-9.
Piccoli L, Migliau G, Besharat LK, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Di Giorgio R. Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017; 8(2): 71-8.
Cochrane NJ, Lo TWG, Adams GG, Schneider PM. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152(3): 312-9.
Della Bona A. Bonding to ceramics: scientific evidences for clinical dentistry. São Paulo: Artes Médicas 2009; p. 252.
Cumerlato M, Lima EM, Osorio LB, Mota EG, Menezes LM, Rizzatto SMD. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated teeth on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22(4): 47-52.
Dias FM, Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Tavares RR, Gurgel Jde A, Bramante FS, Fialho MN. Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20(4): 57-62.
Stella JP, Oliveira AB, Nojima LI, Marquezan M. Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20(4): 51-6.
Sperber RL, Watson PA, Rossouw PE, Sectakof PA. Adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam: In vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116(5): 506-13.
Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: Clinical versus laboratory findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 592-4.
Vidor MM, Felix RP, Marchioro EM, Hahn L. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20(2): 61-7.
Baherimoghadam T, Akbarian S, Rasouli R, Naseri N. Evaluation of enamel damages following orthodontic bracket debonding in fluorosed teeth bonded with adhesion promoter. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(2): 193-8.
Rodríguez-Chávez JA, Arenas-Alatorre J, Belio-Reyes I. Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microsc Res Tech 2017; 80(7): 680-6.
Kim YK, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37(5): 550-5.
Rocha JM, Gravina MA, Silva Campos MJ, Quintão CC, Elias CN, Vitral RW. Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19(1): 77-85.

open access plus

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Published on: 19 September, 2018
Page: [40 - 45]
Pages: 6
DOI: 10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640

Article Metrics

PDF: 260