Genetic Algorithm to Evaluate Downstream and Upstream Information Sharing

Author(s): Mansour Rached*

Journal Name: Current Signal Transduction Therapy

Volume 15 , Issue 1 , 2020

Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Background: In this paper, we present an approach to evaluate the information sharing in the supply chain.

Materials and Methods: We propose a study of four scenarios of sharing upstream and downstream information simultaneously. Replenishment lead time is the upstream information studied in this work and demand information is the downstream one. We treat in this context the case of two-echelon (a warehouse and several retailers) and multi-products supply chain.

Results: We focus our approach on the centralised decision, in which, the warehouse is the decision maker and his goal is to minimise the system cost independently. In our formulation, we consider a system cost composed of holding, ordering, penalty and transportation costs. Then, we use a Genetic Algorithm in order to approximate the optimal echelon inventory position at the warehouse and optimal allocation quantity of each item from the warehouse to the respective retailer, which minimises the system cost.

Conclusion: Our approach is illustrated by some numerical experiments.

Keywords: Information sharing, supply chain, genetic algorithm, downstream information, upstream information, two-echelon.

Byrne PJ, Heavey C. The impact of information sharing and forecasting in capacitated industrial supply chains: A case study. Int J Prod Econ 2006; 103(1): 420-37.
Chu WHJ, Lee CC. Strategic information sharing in a supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 2006; 174(3): 1567-79.
Zhang C, Zhang C. Design and simulation of demand information sharing in a supply chain. Simul Model Pract Theory 2007; 15(1): 32-46.
Li J, Sikora R, Shaw MJ, Tan GW. A strategic analysis of inter organizational information sharing. Decis Support Syst 2006; 42(1): 251-66.
Huang MX, Pan Q, Cheng YM. An Incentive Mechanism of Information Sharing in Supply Chain Proceeding of th 7th Management Science and Engineering ICMSE’07, Harbin. 711-6.
Zaojie K, Guoying H. The Effect of Information Sharing on Inventory in A Two-stage Supply Chain. Proceeding of ICAL’07. Jinan. 2007; pp. 2883-6.
Li L, Zhang H. Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Manage Sci 2008; 54(8): 1467-81.
Wu YN, Cheng TCE. The impact of information sharing in a multiple-echelon supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 2008; 115(1): 1-11.
Srinivas C, Rao CSP, Rao YV. Consignment stock policy using genetic algorithm for effective inventory management in supply chains. Int J Services Operations Inf 2008; 3(2): 107-26.
Rached M, Bahroun Z, Campagne JP. Assessing the value on information sharing and its impacts on the performance of the various links in supply chains. Int J Com Ind Eng 2015; 237-53.
Rached M, Bahroun Z. Decentralized decision-making with information sharing vs. centralized decision-making in supply chains. Int J Prod Res 2016; 22.
Chen MC, Yang T, Yen CT. Investigating the value of information sharing in multi-echelon supply chains. Qual Quant 2007; 41(3): 497-511.
Rached M, Bahroun Z, Baboli A, Campagne JP, Zouari B. A method to evaluate downstream and upstream information sharing using the genetic algorithm. Intl Conf Comp Ind Eng 1635-40.
Moyaux T, Chaib DB, D’Amours S. Information sharing as a coordination mechanism for reducing the bullwhip effect in a supply chain. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2007; 37(3): 396-409.
Zhang H, Wu P, Zhao X, Yeung J. The impact of information sharing pattern and replanning cycle on the performance of supply chain proceeding of automation and logistics ICAL’07, Jinan 2007; 2902-6.
Agrawal S, Sengupta RN, Shanker K. Impact of information sharing and lead time on bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory. Eur J Oper Res 2008; 192(2): 576-93.
Cachon GP, Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Manage Sci 2000; 46(8): 1032-48.
Hsiao JM, Shieh CJ. Evaluating the value of information sharing in a supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2006; 27(5-6): 604-9.
Lee H, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Manage Sci 1997; 43(4): 546-58.
Lee HL, So KC, Tang CS. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Manage Sci 2000; 46(5): 626-43.
Chen F, Yu B. Quantifying the value of leadtime information in a single-location inventory system. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 2005; 7(2): 144-51.
Jia Q, Guo W, Li B. Study on the effect of information sharing strategy to complex supply chain system based on mul-tidimension view by simulation proceeding of wireless communications, networking and mobile computing WiCom’07, Shanghai. 4847-50.
Mehrabi A, Baboli A, Campagne JP. A simulation model for evaluation of the effect of leadtime information sharing in a distribution network Proceeding of Service Systems and Service Management ICSSSM’06, Troyes-France. 2006; 1032.
Mehrabi A, Baboli A, Campagne JP. Evaluer la valeur de partage d’information de délais dans une chaîne logistique avec l’algorithme génétique. Proceeding of 7e Congrès international de génie industriel. Québec. 2007.
Rached M, Bahroun Z, Baboli A, Campagne JP, Zouari B. A method to evaluate downstream and upstream information sharing using the genetic algorithm. Proc Int Con Com Ind Eng 1635-40.
Chan CCH, Cheng CB, Huang W. Formulating ordering policies in a supply chain by genetic algorithm. Int J Mod Simul 2006; 26(2): 129-36.
Lu J, Humphreys P, Mclvor R, Maguire L. Employing genetic algorithms to minimise the bullwhip effect in a supply chain. Ind Eng Eng Manag 2007; pp. 1527-32.
Radhakrishnan P, Prasad VM. Inventory optimization in supply chain management using genetic algorithm IJCSNS international. J Comp Sci Net Sec 2009; 9(1): 33-40.
Chih-Yao L. Advance of dynamic production-inventory strategy for multiple policies using genetic algorithm. Infor Technol J 2008; 7: 647-53.
Mitchell M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. Cambridge: MIT 1997.

open access plus

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2020
Published on: 31 July, 2020
Page: [24 - 33]
Pages: 10
DOI: 10.2174/1574362413666180830105740

Article Metrics

PDF: 13