Gender Differences in Types, Frequency, Clinical Manifestations and Atherosclerotic Burden of Coronary Artery Anomalies

Author(s): Nooraldaem Yousif, Mohammady Shahin, Thomas F. Lüscher, Slayman Obeid*

Journal Name: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Volume 14 , Issue 1 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer
Call for Editor

Graphical Abstract:


Background: Although not well established; gender may play a role in the incidence, clinical manifestations, and atherosclerotic burden of Coronary Artery Anomalies (CAAS). Our aim is to investigate the impact of gender on coronary artery anomalies.

Methods: All coronary angiograms performed at the University Heart Center Zurich, Switzerland, between January 2000 and December 2016 were investigated. Those of anomalous origin, course and termination (fistula) were included in the analysis with the exclusion of coronary artery aneurysms and myocardial bridges.

Results: Out of the original 39577 angiographic studies that included 28550 males and 11026 females, Coronary Artery Anomalies (CAAS) were documented in 130 (0.32%) patients of whom 69.2% (n=90) and 30.8%(n=40) were males and females respectively. However, the overall prevalence of coronary anomalies amongst both genders did not differ (0.32% vs 0.36%, P = 1) and so were the basic characteristics except for hypertension, which was more prevalent in females (P = 0.03644). The most prevalent anomaly overall was (left circumflex artery from right coronary artery/sinus), which was present in (n=47, 36.2%). No impact of gender on the incidence of individual anomalies except for Right Coronary Artery (RCA) originating from Left Circumflex Artery (LCX), which was only documented in men (P = 0.0000116). On the other hand malignant CAAS presented equally with a proportion of 10% for both genders (P = 1). Although males outnumbered females in terms of atherosclerotic burden in CAAS this was statistically not significant (P = 0.331).

Conclusion: Both genders have a similar impact on the overall prevalence, clinical manifestations and atherosclerotic burden of CAAs. Anomaly of RCA originating from LCX occurred more frequently in males than females.

Keywords: Anomaly, congenital anomalies, coronary artery nomalies, fistula PCI congenital anomalies, gender, PCI.

Walsh R, Nielsen JC, Ko HH, et al. Imaging of congenital coronary artery anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 2011; 41: 1526-35.
Figueroa Y, Altieri PI, Banchs H, et al. Coronary artery abnormalities in Puerto Rico. P R Health Sci J 2006; 25: 225-7.
Graidis C, Dimitriadis D, Chamouratidis N. Percutaneous coronary intervention of a totally occluded anomalous right coronary artery arising from the left sinus of valsalva with the use of multiple overlapping drug-eluting stents (“full-metal jacket” technique). J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19: E261-2.
Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 21: 28-40.
Shriki JE, Shinbane JS, Rashid MA, et al. Identifying, characterizing, and classifying congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries. Radiographics 2012; 32: 453-68.
Angelini P. Normal and anomalous coronary arteries: Definitions and classification. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 418-34.
Zhongheng Z. Univariate description and bivariate stat istical inference: The first step delving into data. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4(5): 91.
Angelini P, Velasco JA, Flamm S. Coronary anomalies: Incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance. Circulation 2002; 105: 2449-54.
Correia MJ, Faria JL, Cardoso PP, et al. Percentage of coronary anomalies in a population of patients undergoing coronary angiography: A retrospective study. Rev Port Cardiol 2004; 23: 671-81.
Aydar Y, Yazici HU, Birdane A, et al. Gender differences in the types and frequency of coronary artery anomalies. Tohoku J Exp Med 2011; 225(4): 239-47.
Aydinlar A, Cicek D, Senturk T, et al. Primary congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: A coronary arteriographic study in Western Turkey. Int Heart J 2005; 46: 97-103.
Taylor AJ, Rogan KM, Virmani R. Sudden cardiac death associated with isolated congenital coronary artery anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 640-7.
Lipsett J, Byard RW, Carpenter BF, et al. Anomalous coronary arteries arising from the aorta associated with sudden death in infancy and early childhood. An autopsy series. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1991; 115: 770-3.
Ouali S, Neffeti E, Sendid K, et al. Congenital anomalous aortic origins of the coronary arteries in adults: A Tunisian coronary arteriography study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2009; 102: 201-8.
Yildiz A, Okcun B, Peker T, et al. Prevalence of coronary artery anomalies in 12,457 adult patients who underwent coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol 2010; 33: E60-4.
Wilkins CE, Betancourt B, Mathur VS, et al. Coronary artery anomalies: A review of more than 10,000 patients from the clayton cardiovascular laboratories. Tex Heart Inst J 1988; 15: 166-73.
Arteaga RB, Tronolone J, Mandawat M. Single coronary ostium- A right coronary artery arising from the main coronary artery. J Invasive Cardiol 2006; 18: E241-3.
Roffi M, Eberli FR, Wyttenbach R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main trunk in congenitally anomalous single coronary artery. J Invasive Cardiol 2001; 13: 808-9.
Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29: 364-71.
Antunes N, Meireles A, Gomes C, et al. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery and acute myocardial infarction: Cause or coincidence? Rev Port Cardiol 2012; 31: 509-1.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Published on: 30 January, 2019
Page: [41 - 46]
Pages: 6
DOI: 10.2174/1574887113666180820111341
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 24