Protein Quality, Secondary Structure and Effect of Physicochemical Factors on Emulsifying Properties of Irvingia gabonensis Almonds

Author(s): Martin A. Mune Mune*, Christian B. Bassogog, Pierre A. Bayiga, Carine E. Nyobe, Samuel R. Minka.

Journal Name: Current Nutrition & Food Science

Volume 15 , Issue 4 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: There is a constant search of new plant proteins, with adequate nutritional and functional properties, as well as bioactive properties and low-cost for utilization in various food formulations.

Objective: The aim of this work was to access the nutritional and functional potential of protein from Irvingia gabonensis, for utilization as ingredient or supplement in food.

Methods: Proximate composition and amino acid were analyzed. Nutritional parameters were calculated from amino acid composition. Physicochemical properties and secondary structure of protein were determined. Finally, effect of oil to water ratio (OWR), pH and concentration on emulsifying properties was analyzed.

Results: The flour contained 22.26% protein, 5.30% ash and 60% carbohydrates. Proteins contained all essential amino acids, with high content of Leu, Ile, Val, Thr and sulfur-containing amino acids. Essential amino acid index (69%), protein efficiency ratio (2.39-2.63) and biological value (79.91%) were studied. The maximum protein solubility (61%) was noticed at pH 8, while high hydrophobicity was observed at pH 2. A transition from an irregular secondary structure to a more ordered structure was found from pH 2-4 to pH 6-10. pH, OWR and concentration significantly affected emulsifying properties of Irvingia gabonensis almonds. The maximum emulsifying capacity (EC) was observed under acidic pH and high flour concentration. EC increased with increasing OWR and concentration, while decreased with increasing pH. High ES (25-35%) was observed at pH 4-8 and OWR of 1/3 to 1/2 (v/v), at flour concentration of 3-4% (w/v).

Conclusion: Irvingia gabonensis showed good potential as food ingredient or supplement.

Keywords: Emulsifying properties, hydrophobicity, Irvingia gabonensis, protein quality, response surface methodology, secondary structure.

[1]
Onimawo IA, Oteno F, Orokpo G, Okubor PI. Physicochemical and nutrient evaluation of African bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis) seeds and pulp. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 2003; 58: 1-6.
[2]
Joseph JK. Physico-chemical attributes of wild mango (Irvingia gabonensis) seeds. Bioresour Technol 1995; 53(2): 179-81.
[3]
Ejiofor MAN, Onwubuke SN, Okafor JC. Developing improved methods of processing and utilization of kernels of Irvingia gabonensis (var. gabonensis and var. excelsa). Int Tree Crops J 1987; 4(4): 283-90.
[4]
Oboh G, Ekperigin MM. Nutritional evaluation of some Nigerian wild seeds. Mol Nutr Food Res 2004; 48(2): 85-7.
[5]
Giami SY, Okonkwo VI, Akusu MO. Chemical composition and functional properties of raw, heat-treated and partially proteolysed wild mango (Irvingia gabonensis) seed flour. Food Chem 1994; 49(3): 237-43.
[6]
Ndjouenkeu R, Akingbala JO, Oguntimein GB. Emulsifying properties of three African food hydrocolloids: okra (Hibiscus esculentus), dika nut (Irvingia gabonensis), and khan (Belschmiedia sp.). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 1997; 51(3): 245-55.
[7]
Adamson I, Okafor C, Abu-Bakare A. A supplement of Dikanut (Irvingia gabonesis) improves treatment of type II diabetics. West Afr J Med 1989; 9(2): 108-15.
[8]
Ngondi JL, Oben JE, Minka SR. The effect of Irvingia gabonensis seeds on body weight and blood lipids of obese subjects in Cameroon. Lipids Health Dis 2005; 4(1): 12.
[9]
Kinsella JE, Melachouris N. Functional properties of proteins in foods: A survey. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1976; 7(3): 219-80.
[10]
Cano-Medina A, Islas HJ, Dendooven L, Herrera RP, Alatorre GG. Escamilla-Silva. Emulsifying and foaming capacity and emulsion and foam stability of sesame protein concentrates. Food Res Int 2011; 44: 684-92.
[11]
Mune Mune MA, Sogi DS. Emulsifying and foaming properties of protein concentrates prepared from cowpea and bambara bean using different drying methods. Int J Food Prop 2016; 19: 371-84.
[12]
Zayas JF. Functionality of proteins in foods Springer: New York 1997.
[13]
Lu Q, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. California Hass avocado: Profiling of carotenoids, tocopherols, fatty acids and fat content during maturation and from different growing areas. J Agric Food Chem 2009; 57(21): 10408-13.
[14]
AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990.
[15]
Hellwig M, Matthes R, Peto A, Löbner J, Henle T. N-epsilon-fructosyllysine and N-epsilon-carboxyme-thyllysine but not lysinoalanine are available for absorption after simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Amino Acids 2014; 46: 289-99.
[16]
Hellwig M, Henle T. Release of pyrraline in absorbable peptides during simulated digestion of casein glycated by 2-deoxyglucose. Eur Food Res Technol 2013; 237: 47-55.
[17]
Hurrell RF, Lerman P, Carpenter KJ. Reactive lysine in foodstuffs as measured by a rapid dye - binding pro cedure. J Food Sci 1979; 44: 1221-7.
[18]
Mune Mune MA, Nyobe EC, Bassogog CB, Minka SR. A comparison on the nutritional quality of proteins from Moringa oleifera leaves and seeds. Cogent Food Agric 2016; 2(1): 1213618.
[19]
FAO/WHO. Protein quality evaluation. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy 1991.
[20]
Alsmeyer RH, Cunningham AE, Happich ML. Equations predict PER from amino acid analysis. Food Technol 1974; 28: 34-40.
[21]
Oser BL. An integrated essential amino acid index for predicting the biological value of proteins In: Albanese AA, Ed Protein and amino acid nutrition Academic Press: New York 1959; pp. 295- 311.
[22]
Mørup IK, Olesen ES. New method for prediction of protein value from essential amino acid pattern. Nutr Rep Int 1976; 13: 355-65.
[23]
Chelh I, Gatellier P, Sante-Lhoutellier V. A simplifier procedure for Myofibril hydrophobicity determination. Meat Sci 2006; 74(4): 681-3.
[24]
Mune Mune MA, Bakwo Bassogog CB, Nyobe EC, Minka SR. Physicochemical and functional properties of Moringa oleifera seed and leaf flour. Cogent Food Agric 2016; 2(1): 1220352.
[25]
Farrell HM Jr, Wickham ED, Unruh JJ, Qi PX, Hoagland PD. Secondary structural studies of bovine caseins: Temperature dependence of β-casein structure as analyzed by circular dichroism and FTIR spectroscopy and correlation with micellization. Food Hydrocoll 2001; 15: 341-54.
[26]
Lawal O. Functionality of African locust bean (Parkia biglobossa) protein isolate: Effect of pH, ionic strength and various protein concentrations. Food Chem 2004; 86: 345-55.
[27]
Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments 2nd ed Wiley: New York 2002.
[28]
Rebello CJ, Greenway FL, Finley JW. A review of the nutritional value of legumes and their effects on obesity and its related co‐morbidities. Obes Rev 2014; 15(5): 392-407.
[29]
Pastor‐Cavada E, Juan R, Pastor JE, Alaiz M, Vioque J. Nutritional characteristics of seed proteins in 28 Vicia species (Fabaceae) from Southern Spain. J Food Sci 2011; 76(8): C1118-24.
[30]
Rangel A, Saraiva K, Schwengber P, et al. Biological evaluation of a protein isolate from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds. Food Chem 2004; 87(4): 491-9.
[31]
Mubarak AE. Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of mung bean seeds (Phaseolus aureus) as affected by some home traditional processes. Food Chem 2005; 89(4): 489-95.
[32]
Waller G, Feather M. The maillard reactions in foods and nutrition American Chemical Society: Washington DC 1983.
[33]
Deosthale YG, Mohan VS, Rao KV. Varietal deficiencies in protein lysine and leucine content of gram sorghum. J Agric Food Chem 1970; 18: 644-6.
[34]
Achouri A, Nail V, Boye JI. Sesame protein isolate: Fractionation, secondary structure and functional properties. Food Res Int 2012; 46: 360-9.
[35]
Mune Mune MA, Sogi DS, Minka SR. Response surface methodology for investigating structure-function relationship of grain legume proteins. J Food Process Preserv 2017; 42(5): e13524.


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 15
ISSUE: 4
Year: 2019
Page: [367 - 375]
Pages: 9
DOI: 10.2174/1573401314666180223142018
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 26
HTML: 3