Pain and Opioid Addiction: A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Pain Measurement in Patients with Opioid Dependence on Methadone Maintenance Treatment

Author(s): B. B. Dennis, M. Bawor, J. Paul, C. Plater, G. Pare, A. Worster, M. Varenbut, J. Daiter, D. C. Marsh, D. Desai, L. Thabane, Z. Samaan

Journal Name: Current Drug Abuse Reviews
Continued as Current Drug Research Reviews

Volume 9 , Issue 1 , 2016


Background: While chronic pain has been said to impact patient’s response to methadone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence, the reported findings are inconsistent. These discrepancies may be a direct result of variations in the measurement of chronic pain or definitions of response to methadone treatment. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between pain and substance use behaviour to determine the real impact of comorbid pain in the methadone population. We also aim to examine sources of variation across the literature with a specific focus on the measurement of pain.

Methods/Design: We performed a systematic review using an electronic search strategy across CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library including Cochrane Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Title, abstract, as well as full text screening and extraction were performed in duplicate. Studies evaluating the association between chronic pain and methadone maintenance treatment response were eligible for inclusion in this review. Using a sample of 297 methadone patients from the Genetics of Opioid Addiction (GENOA) research collaborative, we assessed the reliability of patient self-reported pain and the validated Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assessment tool.

Results: After screening 826 articles we identified five studies eligible for full text extraction, of which three showed a significant relationship between the presence of pain and the increase in substance abuse among patients on methadone for the treatment of opioid dependence. Studies varied largely in the definitions and measurement of both pain and response to treatment. Results from our validation of pain measurement in the GENOA sample (n=297) showed the use of a simple self-reported pain question is highly correlated to the use of the BPI. Simply asking patients whether they have pain showed a 44.2% sensitivity, 88.8% specificity, 84.4% PPV and 53.6% NPV to the BPI. The area under the ROC curve was 0.67 and the Pearson χ2 was 37.3; (p<0.0001).

Discussion: The field of addiction medicine is at a lack of consensus as to the real effect of chronic pain on treatment response among opioid dependent patients. Whether it be the lack of a single “gold standard” measurement of response, or a lack of consistent measurement of pain, it is difficult to summarize and compare the results of these relatively small investigations. In comparison to the BPI, use of the simple self-reported pain has lower sensitivity for identifying patients with pain, suggesting the inconsistencies in these studies may result from differences in pain measurement. Future validation studies of pain measurement are required to address the predictive value of self-reported pain.

Keywords: Chronic pain, methadone, opioid, opioid dependence, pain, substance abuse.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2016
Published on: 17 March, 2016
Page: [49 - 60]
Pages: 12
DOI: 10.2174/187447370901160321102837

Article Metrics

PDF: 194
HTML: 27
PRC: 1