Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Cardiology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-403X
ISSN (Online): 1875-6557

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Review Article

The Vectorcardiogram and the Main Dromotropic Disturbances

Author(s): Andrés R. Pérez-Riera*, Raimundo Barbosa-Barros, Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo, Luiz C. de Abreu and Kjell Nikus

Volume 17, Issue 1, 2021

Published on: 10 August, 2020

Page: [50 - 59] Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/1573403X16666200810105504

Price: $65

Abstract

Until the mid-1980s, it was believed that the vectorcardiogram (VCG) presented a greater specificity, sensitivity and accuracy in comparison to the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), in the cardiology diagnosis. Currently, the VCG still is superior to the ECG in specific situations, such as in the evaluation of myocardial infarctions when associated with intraventricular conduction disturbances, in the identification and location of accessory pathways in ventricular preexcitation, in the differential diagnosis of patterns varying from normal of electrical axis deviation, in the evaluation of particular aspects of Brugada syndrome, Brugada phenocopies, concealed form of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and zonal or fascicular blocks of the right bundle branch on right ventricular free wall.VCG allows us to analyze the presence of left septal fascicular block more accurately than ECG and in the diagnosis of the interatrial blocks and severity of some chambers enlargements. The three-dimensional spatial orientation of both the atrial and the ventricular activity provides a far more complete observation tool than the linear ECG. We believe that the ECG/VCG binomial simultaneously obtained by the technique called electro-vectorcardiography (ECG/VCG) brought a significant gain for the differential diagnosis of several pathologies. Finally, in the field of education and research, VCG provided a better and more rational tridimensional insight into the electrical phenomena that occurs spatially, and represented an important impact on the progress of electrocardiography.

Keywords: Vectorcardiogram, electrocardiogram, dromotropic disturbances, left septal fascicular block, interatrial block, ventricular preexcitation.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Benchimol A, Desser KB, Schumacher J. Value of the vectorcardiogram for distinguishing left anterior hemiblock from inferior infarction with left axis deviation. Chest 1972; 61(1): 74-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.61.1.74] [PMID: 5049507]
[2]
Lee GB, Wilson WJ, Amplatz K, Tuna N. Correlation of vectorcardiogram and electrocardiogram with coronary arteriogram. Circulation 1968; 38(1): 189-200.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.38.1.189] [PMID: 11712288]
[3]
Chou TC. When is the vectorcardiogram superior to the scalar electrocardiogram? J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8(4): 791-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80419-3] [PMID: 2944936]
[4]
Hurd HP II, Starling MR, Crawford MH, Dlabal PW, O’Rourke RA. Comparative accuracy of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for inferior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1981; 63(5): 1025-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.63.5.1025] [PMID: 7471360]
[5]
de Luna AB, Massó-van Roessel A, Robledo LAE. The diagnosis and clinical implications of interatrial block. Eur Cardiol 2015; 10(1): 54-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2015.10.01.54] [PMID: 30310424]
[6]
Escobar-Robledo LA, Bayés-de-Luna A, Lupón J, et al. Advanced interatrial block predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure: The “Bayes’ Syndrome-HF” study. Int J Cardiol 2018; 271: 174-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.050] [PMID: 29801761]
[7]
Bayés de Luna A, Cladellas M, Oter R, et al. Interatrial conduction block and retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eur Heart J 1988; 9(10): 1112-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062407] [PMID: 3208776]
[8]
Bayés de Luna A, Oter MC, Guindo J. Interatrial conduction block with retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: Influence of preventive antiarrhythmic treatment. Int J Cardiol 1989; 22(2): 147-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-5273(89)90061-2] [PMID: 2914739]
[9]
Bayes de Luna A, Fort de Ribot R, Trilla E, et al. Electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic study of interatrial conduction disturbances with left atrial retrograde activation. J Electrocardiol 1985; 18(1): 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(85)80029-7] [PMID: 3156200]
[10]
Bayés de Luna A. The ECG for beginners. USA: Wiley-Blackwell 2014.
[11]
Bayés de Luna A, Gusí Gené C, Soler Soler J, et al. Electrocardiologia clínica (2 volúmenes). Barcelona, Spain: Cinetiífico-Médica 1977.
[12]
Bayés de Luna A, Platonov P, Cosio FG, et al. Interatrial blocks. A separate entity from left atrial enlargement: A consensus report. J Electrocardiol 2012; 45(5): 445-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.06.029] [PMID: 22920783]
[13]
Baranchuk A, Bayes-Genis A. Bayés’ syndrome. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2016; 69(4): 439.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2015.12.013] [PMID: 26948392]
[14]
Ariyarajah V, Spodick DH. Advanced interatrial block: A classic electrocardiogram. Cardiology 2005; 104(1): 33-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000086052] [PMID: 15942182]
[15]
Waldo AL, Vitikainen KJ, Hoffman BF. The sequence of retrograde atrial activation in the canine heart. Correlation with positive and negative retrograde P waves. Circ Res 1975; 37(2): 156-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.37.2.156] [PMID: 1149190]
[16]
Spodick DH, Ariyarajah V, Apiyasawat S. Higher prevalence of cardiovascular events among patients with abnormal atrial depolarization and coronary artery disease at 18 months’ post-exercise tolerance testing. Am Heart Hosp J 2007; 5(4): 236-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-9215.2007.07361.x] [PMID: 17982305]
[17]
Miquel C, Sodi-Pallares D, Cisneros F, Pileggi F, Medrano GA, Bisteni A. Right bundle branch block and right ventricular hypertrophy; electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis. Am J Cardiol 1958; 1(1): 57-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(58)90076-6] [PMID: 13497956]
[18]
Bussink BE, Holst AG, Jespersen L, Deckers JW, Jensen GB, Prescott E. Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J 2013; 34(2): 138-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs291] [PMID: 22947613]
[19]
de Micheli A, Medrano GA, Martínez Rios MA. Right blocks in interauricular communication. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1978; 48(6): 1091-113.
[PMID: 727842]
[20]
Tabatabaei N, Katanyuwong P, Breen JF, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Uncommon variant of Ebstein anomaly with tricuspid stenosis. Circulation 2009; 120(1): e1-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.835652] [PMID: 19581515]
[21]
Hébert JL, Duthoit G, Hidden-Lucet F, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Fortuitous discovery of partial Uhl anomaly in a male adult. Circulation 2010; 121(22): e426-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960773] [PMID: 20530016]
[22]
Gelband H, Waldo AL, Kaiser GA, Bowman FO Jr, Malm JR, Hoffman BF. Etiology of right bundle-branch block in patients undergoing total correction of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation 1971; 44(6): 1022-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.44.6.1022] [PMID: 5127831]
[23]
Krongrad E, Hefler SE, Bowman FO Jr, Malm JR, Hoffman BF. Further observations on the etiology of the right bundle branch block pattern following right ventriculotomy. Circulation 1974; 50(6): 1105-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.50.6.1105] [PMID: 4430109]
[24]
Riera AR, de Cano SJ, Cano MN, Gimenez VM, de Padua Fleury Neto LA, Sousa JE. Vector electrocardiographic alterations after percutaneous septal ablation in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Possible anatomic causes. Arq Bras Cardiol 2002; 79(5): 466-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2002001400004]] [PMID: 12447497]
[25]
Tomita M, Kitazawa H, Sato M, Okabe M, Antzelevitch C, Aizawa Y. A complete right bundle-branch block masking Brugada syndrome. J Electrocardiol 2012; 45(6): 780-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.06.019] [PMID: 22832153]
[26]
Zamfirescu NR, Ciplea A, Filcescu V, et al. Right branch block associated with anterior left hemiblock; electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic aspects. Physiologie 1978; 15(4): 269-78.
[PMID: 106412]
[27]
Retamal E, Illanes A, Moreno J. Vectorcardiographic study of 15 patients with anterior left hemiblock and right branch block. Rev Med Chil 1972; 100(9): 1077-81.
[PMID: 4644071]
[28]
Medrano GA, Brenes C, De Micheli A, Sodi-Pallares D. Block of the anterior subdivision of the left bundle-branch, isolated or combined with right bundle-branch block. Clinical, electro and vectorcardiography studies. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1969; 39(5): 672-87.
[PMID: 5374309]
[29]
Cergueira-Gomes M, Correia-dos-Santos J, Paula-Pinto R, Abreu-Lima C, Ramalhào C, Rocha-Gonçalves F. Right bundle branch block combined with left axis deviation: A vectorcardiographic study of 48 cases. J Electrocardiol 1972; 5(2): 127-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(72)80028-1] [PMID: 4260729]
[30]
Lichstein E, Chadda KD, Gupta PK. Complete right bundle branch block with left axis deviations: Significance of vectorcardiographic morphology. Am Heart J 1973; 86(1): 13-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(73)90004-5] [PMID: 4268305]
[31]
Dubner S, Schapachnik E, Riera AR, Valero E. Chagas disease: State-of-the-art of diagnosis and management. Cardiol J 2008; 15(6): 493-504.
[PMID: 19039752]
[32]
Ribeiro AL, Marcolino MS, Prineas RJ, Lima-Costa MF. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in elderly Chagas disease patients: 10-year follow-up of the Bambui Cohort Study of Aging. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3(1)e000632
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000632] [PMID: 24510116]
[33]
Villongco CT, Krummen DE, Stark P, Omens JH, McCulloch AD. Patient-specific modeling of ventricular activation pattern using surface ECG-derived vectorcardiogram in bundle branch block. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2014; 115(2-3): 305-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.06.011] [PMID: 25110279]
[34]
Rodríguez-Padial L, Rodríguez-Picón B, Jerez-Valero M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-assisted electrocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in left bundle branch block. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2012; 65(1): 38-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2011.07.017] [PMID: 22100804]
[35]
Liakopoulos V, Kellerth T, Christensen K. Left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction: Does chronicity of the branch block matter? Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2013; 2(2): 182-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048872613483589] [PMID: 24222829]
[36]
Brembilla-Perrot B, Alla F, Suty-Selton C, et al. Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: Results of noninvasive and invasive evaluation in 310 patients and clinical significance of bundle branch block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31(11): 1383-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01199.x] [PMID: 18950294]
[37]
Chan DD, Wu KC, Loring Z, et al. Comparison of the relation between left ventricular anatomy and QRS duration in patients with cardiomyopathy with versus without left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113(10): 1717-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.026] [PMID: 24698465]
[38]
Poels TT, Houthuizen P, Van Garsse LA, Maessen JG, de Jaegere P, Prinzen FW. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced left bundle branch block: Causes and consequences. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2014; 7(4): 395-405.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-014-9560-x] [PMID: 24800873]
[39]
Silva JA, Khuri B, Barbee W, Fontenot D, Cheirif J. Systolic excursion of the mitral annulus to assess septal function in paradoxic septal motion. Am Heart J 1996; 131(1): 138-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90062-9] [PMID: 8554000]
[40]
Bharati S, Lev M, Dhingra RC, Chuquimia R, Towne WD, Rosen KM. Electrophysiologic and pathologic correlations in two cases of chronic second degree atrioventricular block with left bundle branch block. Circulation 1975; 52(2): 221-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.52.2.221] [PMID: 125157]
[41]
Kyndt F, Probst V, Potet F, et al. Novel SCN5A mutation leading either to isolated cardiac conduction defect or Brugada syndrome in a large French family. Circulation 2001; 104(25): 3081-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/hc5001.100834] [PMID: 11748104]
[42]
Asatryan B, Medeiros-Domingo A. Molecular and genetic insights into progressive cardiac conduction disease. Europace 2019; 21(8): 1145-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz109] [PMID: 31087102]
[43]
Mavrogeni S, Karabela G, Stavropoulos E, et al. Heart failure imaging patterns in systemic lupus erythematosus. Evaluation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol 2014; 176(2): 559-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.016] [PMID: 25049017]
[44]
Rowinsky EK, McGuire WP, Guarnieri T, Fisherman JS, Christian MC, Donehower RC. Cardiac disturbances during the administration of taxol. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9(9): 1704-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1991.9.9.1704] [PMID: 1678781]
[45]
Bellavia D, Pellikka PA, Abraham TP, et al. ‘Hypersynchronisation’ by tissue velocity imaging in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Heart 2009; 95(3): 234-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.140343] [PMID: 18474536]
[46]
Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107(6): 927-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010] [PMID: 21376930]
[47]
Manohar N, Young ML. Rate dependent bundle branch block induced by hyperkalemia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26(9): 1909-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00291.x] [PMID: 12930511]
[48]
Al-Hadi H, Sallam M. Symptomatic permanent left bundle branch block (LBBB) complicating diagnostic left heart catheterization. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2010; 10: 114-9.
[49]
Castellanos A Jr, Chapunoff E, Castillo CA, Arcebal AG, Lemberg L. The vectorcardiogram in left posterior hemiblock associated with inferior wall myocardial infarction. Chest 1972; 61(3): 221-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.61.3.221] [PMID: 5021166]
[50]
Pérez-Riera AR, Barbosa-Barros R, Daminello-Raimundo R, de Abreu LC, Nikus K. The tetrafascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system. Clin Cardiol 2019; 42(1): 169-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23093] [PMID: 30294894]
[51]
Damjanović MR, Dordević-Radojković D, Perisić Z, et al. Ebstein’s anomaly as a cause of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Vojnosanit Pregl 2008; 65(11): 847-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/VSP0811847D] [PMID: 19069718]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
32
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy