Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Influence of Temperature and Shear Rate on Rheological Properties of CTAC/NaSal Aqueous Solution

Author(s): Mingjun Pang* and Chengcheng Xie

Volume 12, Issue 4, 2019

Page: [296 - 311] Pages: 16

DOI: 10.2174/2405520412666190731110603

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: It is very important for understanding the turbulence drag-reducing mechanism and for improving product quality in the fields of pharmaceutical and chemical engineering to deeply investigate the rheological properties of surfactants solutions.

Methods: The rheological properties of Cationic surfactant (Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Chloride)/Sodium salicylate were measured and analyzed with the MCR302 rheometer.

Results: The present results show that the shear viscosity of CTAC/NaSal solution with the exception of 0.9375mmol·L-1 can show the Newtonian characteristic, the shear-thickening, the shear-thinning and the stable shear properties with changing shear time. The induction time increases with a shear rate as a power law function relation tind=aγb.

Conclusion: The shear viscosity of the CTAC/NaSal solution can be divided into three regions with shear rate, and its flow curve conforms to a linear function in the logarithmic coordinate. When the concentration and the shear rate are relatively high, the viscosity curve of the CTAC/NaSal solution appears "platform" at the high temperature. When the shear rate is greater than 90s-1, the shear viscosity only appears shear thinning with increasing temperature.

Keywords: Surfactant, rheological properties, shear rate, temperature, shear viscosity, cationic surfactant.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Silvia T, Marcilall H, Gabriel L, Emma R. Effect of the aniline hydrochloride hydrotrope on the microstructure of SDS/water system: Linear rheological behavior. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2017; 523: 19-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.04.006]
[2]
Xu N, Wei JJ, Kawaguchi Y. Dynamic and energy analysis on the viscosity transitions with increasing temperature under shear for dilute CTAC surfactant solutions. Ind Eng Chem Res 2016; 55(8): 2279-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04659]
[3]
Krafft MP. Strasbourg’s SOFFT Team-Soft functional systems self-assembled from perfluoroalkylated molecular components. J Fluor Chem 2012; 134: 90-102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.04.009]
[4]
Padoan G, Elisabeth TG, Alessandro Z, et al. Behavior of wormlike micellar solutions formed without any additives from semi-fluorinated quaternary ammonium salts. Soft Matter 2013; 9(37): 8992-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm51591e]
[5]
Wang X, Wang R, Zheng Y, et al. Interaction between zwitterionic surface activity ionic liquid and anionic surfactant: Na (+)-driven wormlike micelles. J Phys Chem B 2013; 117(6): 1886-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp308016a] [PMID: 23336558]
[6]
Pang MJ, Xie CC, Zhang Z, et al. Experimental studies on drag reduction by coupled addition of nonionic polymer poly (ethylene oxide) and cationic surfactant cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 2018; 13(4)e2218
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/apj.2218]
[7]
Liu D, Wang Q, Wei J. Experimental study on drag reduction performance of mixed polymer and surfactant solutions. Chem Eng Res Des 2018; 132: 460-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.01.047]
[8]
Hu YT, Boltenhagen P. Shear thickening in low-concentration solutions of wormlike micelles. I. Direct visualization of transient behavior and phase transitions. J Rheol (NYNY) 1998; 42(5): 1185-208.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.550926]
[9]
Hu YT, Boltenhagen P. Shear thickening in low-concentration solutions of wormlike micelles. II. slip, fracture, and stability of the shear-induced phase. J Rheol (NYNY) 1998; 42(5): 1209-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.550917]
[10]
Nuria C, Jenifer S, Manuel B, et al. Shear-induced structural transitions in a model fabric softener containing an esterquat surfactant. J Surfactants Deterg 2016; 19(3): 609-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-016-1808-9]
[11]
Kawabata Y, Bradbury R, Kugizaki S, et al. Effect of interlamellar interactions on shear induced multilamellar vesicle formation. J Chem Phys 2017; 147(3)034905
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4994563] [PMID: 28734290]
[12]
Lin MQ, Zhao H, Ding B, et al. Rheological properties of quaternary ammonium gemini surfactant in aqueous solution. J Surfactants Deterg 2015; 18(1): 67-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11743-014-1645-7]
[13]
Partal P, Kowalski AJ, Machin D. Rheology and microstructural transitions in the lamellar phase of a cationic surfactant. Langmuir 2001; 17(5): 1331-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la0007731]
[14]
Israelachvili JN, Mithheel DJ, Ninham BW. Theory of selfassembly of hydrocarbon amphiphiles into micelles and bilayers. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 1976; 72(24): 1525-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/f29767201525]
[15]
Salim NV, Guo Q. Multiple vesicular morphologies in AB/AC diblock copolymer complexes through hydrogen bonding interactions. J Phys Chem B 2011; 115(31): 9528-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp200678a] [PMID: 21751806]
[16]
Tamano S, Ohashi Y, Morinish Y. Dynamics of falling droplet and elongational properties of dilute nonionic surfactant solutions with drag-reducing ability. Phys Fluids 2017; 29(5): 1-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4984000]
[17]
Qi Y, Zakin JL. Chemical and rheological characterization of drag-reducing cationic surfactant systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002; 41(25): 6326-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0110484]
[18]
Zhou M, Li S, Zhang Z, et al. Synthesis of oligomer betaine surfactant (DDTPA) and rheological properties of wormlike micellar solution system. J Taiwan Ins Chem Eng 2016; 66: 1-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.05.013]
[19]
Sato D, Obara K, Kawabata Y, Iwahashi M, Kato T. Re-entrant lamellar/onion transition with varying temperature under shear flow. Langmuir 2013; 29(1): 121-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la3041665] [PMID: 23214993]
[20]
Ohlebdrof D, Interthal W, Hoffmann H. Surfactant systems for drag reduction: Physico-chemical properties and rheological behaviour. Rheol Acta 1986; 25(5): 468-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01774397]
[21]
Bergins C. The flow of a dilute cationic surfactant solution past a circular cylinder. Exp Fluids 2001; 30: 410-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003480000218]
[22]
Haas S, Hoffmann H, Thunig C, et al. Phase and aggregation behaviour of double-chain cationic surfactants from the class of N-alkyl-N-alkyl’-N, N-dimethylammonium bromide surfactants. Colloid Polym Sci 1999; 177(9): 856-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003960050462]
[23]
Dehmoune J, Decruppe JP, Greffier O, et al. Rheometric investigation on the temporal shear thickening of dilute micellar solutions of C14-, C16-, and C18TAB/NaSal. J Rheol (NYNY) 2008; 52(4): 923-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.2933352]
[24]
Liu F, Zhou W, Liu DJ, et al. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics study on the rheological behaviors of surfactant aqueous solution. J Mol Liq 2018; 265: 572-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.06.025]
[25]
Yesilata B, Clasen C, Mckinley GH. Nonlinear shear and extensional flow dynam. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 2005; 133(2): 73-90.
[26]
Olmsted PD, Radulescu O. Johnson-Segalman model with a diffusion term in cylindrical Couette flow. J Rheol (NYNY) 2000; 44(2): 257-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.551085]
[27]
Acevedo A, Takhistov P, de la Rosa CP, Florián V. Thermal gelation of aqueous hydroxypropylmethylcellulose solutions with SDS and hydrophobic drug particles. Carbohydr Polym 2014; 102: 74-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.017] [PMID: 24507257]
[28]
Lu B, Li X, Scriven LE, et al. Effect of chemical structure on viscoelasticity and extensional viscosity of drag-reducing cationic surfactant solutions. Langmuir 1997; 14(1): 8-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la970630n]
[29]
Protzl B, Springer J. Light scattering experiment on shear induced structures of micellar solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 1997; 190(2): 327-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1997.4866] [PMID: 9241174]
[30]
Ying L, Martin K, Wing KL. Primitive chain network study on uncrosslined and crosslined cis-polyisoprene polymers. Polymer (Guildf) 2011; 52(25): 5867-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.10.044]
[31]
Hu YT, Wang SQ, Jamieson AM. Rheological and flow birefringence studies of a shear-thickening complex fluid-A surfactant model system. J Rheol (NYNY) 1993; 3(37): 531-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.550458]
[32]
Wang S, Zhao K. Dielectric analysis for the spherical and rodlike micelle aggregates formed from a gemini surfactant: Driving forces of micellization and stability of micelles. Langmuir 2016; 32(30): 7530-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01523] [PMID: 27396495]
[33]
Coppola L, Youssry M, Nicotera I, Gentile L. Rheological investigation of thermal transitions in vesicular dispersion. J Colloid Interface Sci 2009; 338(2): 550-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.06.054] [PMID: 19615692]
[34]
Narayanan J, Mendes E, Manohra C, et al. Vesicle to micelle transition driven by surface solid-fluid transition. Int J Mod Phys B 2002; 16(1): 375-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217979202009895]
[35]
Cates ME. Dynamics of living polymers and flexible surfactant micelles: Scaling laws for dilution. J Phys (Paris) 1988; 49(9): 1593-600.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:019880049090159300]
[36]
Kalur GC, Frounfelker BD, Cipriano BH, Norman AI, Raghavan SR. Viscosity increase with temperature in cationic surfactant solutions due to the growth of wormlike micelles. Langmuir 2005; 21(24): 10998-1004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la052069w] [PMID: 16285764]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
23
3
1
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy