Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Towards a Unified Model on the Description and Design of Process Operations: Extending the concept of Separation Units to Solid-fluid Sedimentation

Author(s): Julio L. Bueno de las Heras, Antonio Gutiérrez-Lavín, Manuel María Mahamud-López*, Marisol Muñiz-Álvarez and Patricia Rodríguez-López

Volume 12, Issue 1, 2019

Page: [15 - 53] Pages: 39

DOI: 10.2174/2405520412666181123094540

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Bridging the gap between different phenomena, mechanisms and levels of description, different design methods can converge in a unitary way of formulation. This protocol consolidates the analogy and parallelism in the description of any unit operation of separation, as is the particular case of sedimentation. This holistic framework is compatible and complementary with other methodologies handled at length, and tries to contribute to the integration of some imaginative and useful - but marginal, heuristic or rustic- procedures for the design of settlers and thickeners, within well founded and unified methodology.

Objective: Classical models for hindered sedimentation allow solid flux in the direction of the gravity field to be formulated by analogy to changes obeying a potential, such as molecular transfer in the direction of the gradient and chemical transformation throughout the reaction coordinate. This article justifies the fundamentals of such a suggestive generalized analogy through the definition of the time of the sedimentation unit (TSU), the effective surface area of a sedimentation unit (ASU) and the number of sedimentation units (NSU), as elements of a sizing equation.

Methods: This article also introduces the generalization of the model ab initio: Analogy is a well known and efficient tool, not only in the interpretation of events with academic or coaching purposes, but also in the generalized modelling, prospective, innovation, analysis and synthesis of technological processes. Chemical Engineering protocols for the basic dimensioning of Unit Operations driven by potentials (momentum, heat and mass transfer chemical reaction) are founded in macroscopic balances of mass and energy.

Results: These balances, emphatically called “design equations”, result from the integration of mechanistic differential formulations at the microscopic level of description (“equations of variation”). In its turn, these equations include phenomenological terms that may be formulated in corpuscular terms in the field of Chemical Physics. The design equation correlates requirements in equipment (e.g. any practical forms of size and residence or elapsed time for an efficient interaction) to the objectives of the operation (e.g. variations in mass or energy contents of a confined or fluent system). This formulation allows the identification of different contributions: intrinsic terms (related to mechanistic kinetics of the phenomena) and circumstantial terms (related to conditions and variables of operation).

Conclusion: In fact, this model suggests that temporal or spatial dimensions of the equipment may be assumed to depend irrespectively on two design contributions: the entity of a representative “unit of operation (or process)” - illustrated by a descriptor of this dimension- and the “number of (these) units” needed to achieve the separating or transformative objectives of the operation.

Keywords: Unit operations, separation processes, design, particle technology, sedimentation, unified model.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Bueno JL, Lavín AG. Theory and practice in sedimentation: Fundamentals of settling and thickening I II and III Unit Operations. Ing Quim 1986; 213: 65-77.
[2]
Bueno JL. Applied thermodynamics in chemical engineering. (III. Fundamentals of unit operations). Edi- UnO: 2015; ISBN 978-84-8317-930-7.
[3]
Bird RB, Stewart WE, Ligthfoot EN. Transport Phenomena, 1st & 2nd eds., J. Wiley & Sons 1960, 2006.
[4]
Welty JR, Wilson RE, Wicks CE. Fundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer. John Wiley & Sons 1984.
[5]
Coulson JM, Richardson JF. Backhurst, JH Harker Chem Engineer. 6th ed. Pergamon: Oxford 2005.
[6]
Levenspiel O. Chemical Reaction Engineering. 3rd ed. Wiley 1999.
[7]
Rodríguez P, Lavín AG, Mahamud MM, Bueno JL. Flow models for rectangular sedimentation tanks. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensificat 2008; 47(9-10): 1705-6.
[8]
Lavín AG, Mahamud MM, Bueno JL. New developments in sedimentation and sedimentator design. Recent Pat Chem Eng 2010; 3: 129-41.
[9]
Rodríguez P, Muñiz M, Mahamud MM, Lavín AG, Bueno JL. Extending the transport analogy to thickeners design. Comm at IWA specialist conference2011: Water & industry, Valladolid, Spain.
[10]
Zhiyao S, Tingting W, Fumin X, Ruijie L. A simple formula for predicting settling velocity of sediment particles. Water Sci Eng 2008; 1: 37-43.
[11]
Zhang H, Liang Y, Yan XB, Wang B, Wang N. Simulation on water and sand separation from crude oil in settling tanks based on the particle model. J Petrol Sci Eng 2017; 156: 366-72.
[12]
Bueno JL. Particle size description: A question of concepts and nomenclature. A challenge for IUPAC? Ing Quim 2002; 394: 432-49.
[13]
Kynch GJ. A theory of sedimentation. Trans Faraday Soc 1952; 48: 166-76.
[14]
Bueno JL, Lavín AG, Muñiz M. Design of settlers-thickeners: Unified design. Ing Quim 2006; 10: 92-9.
[15]
Koo S. Estimation of hindered settling velocity of suspensions. J Ind Eng Chem 2009; 15: 45-9.
[16]
Coe H, Clevenger GH. Methods for determining the capacities of slime settling tanks. Trans Am Inst Mining Eng 1916; 55: 356-84.
[17]
Talmage WP, Fitch EB. Determining thickening unit areas. Ind Eng Chem 1955; 47: 38-41.
[18]
Shanon PT, Tory EM. Settling of slurries. Ind Eng Chem 1965; 57(2): 18-25.
[19]
Obata E, Watanabe H. Analysis of semi-continuous thickener using a batch settling curve. J Chem Eng of Jpn 1979; 12(4): 307-12.
[20]
Lavín AG. A contribution to the study of settlers: Pilot plant for flocculation and settling-thickening in closed circuit. 1984 PhD Thesis, University of Oviedo, Spain.
[21]
Concha F, Bustos MC. A modification of kynch theory of sedimentation. AIChE J 1987; 33(2): 312.
[22]
Concha F. Settling velocities of particulate systems. Kona Powder Particle J 2009; 27: 18-37.
[23]
Concha F, Bürger R. Thickening in the 20th century: A historical perspective. Miner Metall Process 2003; 20(2): 57-67.
[24]
Font R. Analysis of the batch sedimentation test. Chem Eng Sci 1991; 46(10): 2473-82.
[25]
Fitch B. Kynch. Theory and compression zones. AIChE J 1983; 29(6): 940-7.
[26]
Muñiz M, Berthiaux H, Lavín AG, Bueno JL. Pilot-Plant studies of non-steady state continuous sedimentation: Hydrodynamics and solids distribution profiles. Powder Technol 1998; 96(3): 267-74.
[27]
Muñiz M. Settler-thickener design in transient regime: Application of a conductometric method to determine velocity profiles. PhD Thesis, University of Oviedo, Spain. 2001.
[28]
Berthiaux H, Bueno JL, Lavín AG, Muñiz M. Modéles hydrodynamiques pour la séparation des courants dans un decanteur pilote. Can J Chem Eng 2007; 85(2): 158-70.
[29]
Le Goff P. Tecnologie des solides finement divisés. In Stages de Formation des Ingenieurs. J Dodds ed. ENSIC-CPIC, Nancy 1991.
[30]
Ben L, Stenstrom MK. Research advances and challenges in one dimensional modelling of secondary settling tanks: A critical review. Water Res 2014; 65: 40-63.
[31]
Garrido F, Concha F, Bürger R. Settling velocities of particulate systems: 14 Unified model of sedimentation, centrifugation and filtration of flocculated suspensions. Int J Miner Process 2005; 72(2003): 57-74.
[32]
Matko T, Fawcett N, Sharp A, Stephenson T. Recent progress in the numerical modelling of wastewater sedimentation tanks Trans Inst Chem Eng 1996; 74(Part B): 245-58.
[33]
Keinath TM. Activated sludge-unified system design and operation. J Environ Eng Div 1977; 103(5): 829-49.
[34]
Yoshioka N, Hotta Y, Tanaka S, Naito S, Tongami S. Continuous thickening of homogeneous slurries. Chem Engineer Tokyo 1957; 21: 66-74.
[35]
Richardson JF, Zaki WN. Sedimentation and fluidization. Trans Inst Chem Eng 1954; 32: 35-53.
[36]
Bargiel M, Tory EM. Extension of the richardson-zaki equation to suspensions of multisized irregular particles. Int J Miner Process 2013; 120: 22-15.
[37]
Cuesta E. Settling thickeners surface area calculations from an analytical adjustment of the state curve of flocculated sedimentation. G Eng Thesis, University of Oviedo, Spain 1984.
[38]
Michaels AS, Bolger JC. Settling rates and sediment volume of flocculated kaolin suspensions. I&EC Fundament 1962; 1: 24-33.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
50
2
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy