Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2210-3279
ISSN (Online): 2210-3287

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

An Analytical Model of Multi-intrusion Detection for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks Applied in the Monitoring Area

Author(s): Noureddine Assad*, Chouaib Moujahdi, Asmaa El Hannani, Mohamed Hanine and Mohamed Lachgar

Volume 12, Issue 5, 2022

Published on: 18 July, 2022

Page: [369 - 378] Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/2210327912666220610123330

Price: $65

Abstract

Aim: For a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN), the sensor node deployment is a critical issue since it reflects the coverage quality. It is the most fundamental issue in WSNs, and it has a great effect on the overall WSN application performance. When it is necessary to deploy randomly sensor nodes in a field of interest to form a WSN, ensuring a high coverage quality becomes difficult. In the random deployment scenario, the most difficult aspect of sensing coverage is to find how well the sensor nodes cover the field of interest. In this paper, we analyze the intrusion detection in a WSN which is defined as a mechanism for monitoring and detecting any intruder in a field of interest, with the objective of enhancing the detection quality in a random WSN. It is required to establish more specific measurements of node density and sensor range that impact the overall system performance especially in the intrusion detection application. To enhance the quality of intrusion detection, several probabilistic models are adopted for heterogeneous WSN in the random deployment scenario.

Methods: Multi-intrusion detection model probability in a heterogeneous wireless sensor network for random deployment was used.

Results and Discussion: In both homogeneous and heterogeneous WSNs, we analyzed our probabilistic model for multi-intrusion detection in single and multi-sensing detection.

Conclusion: Our probabilistic models are useful in selecting the critical parameters of WSN in order to meet the detection quality requirement.

Keywords: Intrusion detection probability, monitoring area, heterogeneous WSN, sensing range, node density, deployment.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Mahboubi H, Aghdam AG. Distributed deployment algorithms for coverage improvement in a network of wireless mobile sensors: Relo-cation by virtual force. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 2016; 4(4): 736-48.
[2]
Wu Y, Cardei M. Distributed algorithms for barrier coverage via sensor rotation in wireless sensor networks. J Comb Optim 2016; 36(1): 1-22.
[3]
Farsi M, Elhosseini MA, Badawy M, Ali HA, Eldin HZ. Deployment techniques in wireless sensor networks, coverage and connectivity: A survey IEEE Access 2019; 7: 28940-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902072]
[4]
Maheshwari A, Chand N. A survey on wireless sensor networks coverage problems. In: Krishna C, Dutta M, Kumar R. (eds) Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Networking. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 46. Singapore; Springer.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1217-5_16]
[5]
Kiani F, Seyyedabbasi A. Wireless sensor network and internet of things in precision agriculture Inter J Adv Comput Sci Appl (IJACSA) 2018; 9(6)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090614]
[6]
Mazumdar N, Om H. Distributed fuzzy logic based energyaware and coverage preserving unequal clustering algorithm for Wireless sensor networks. Int J Commun Syst 2017; 30(13): e3283.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dac.3283]
[7]
Wang Y, Yin M, Ouyang D, Zhang L. A novel local search algorithm with configuration checking and scoring mechanism for the set k-covering problem. Int Trans Oper Res 2017; 24(6): 1463-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/itor.12280]
[8]
Cheng C-F, Tsai K-T. Encircled belt-barrier coverage in Wireless visual sensor networks. Pervasive Mobile Comput 2017; 38: 233-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.08.005]
[9]
Ma C, Liang W, Zheng M. Delay constrained relay node placement in wireless sensor networks: A subtree-and-mergence-based approach. Mob Netw Appl 2017; 23(5): 1-13.
[10]
Chand S, Kumar B, et al. Maximising network lifetime for target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. IET Wirel Sens Syst 2016; 6(6): 192-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2015.0094]
[11]
Sohal AK, Sharma AK, Sood N. Enhancing coverage using weight based clustering in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 2018; 98(4): 3505-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5026-1]
[12]
Morais V, Mateus GR. Configuration-based approach for topological problems in the design of wireless sensor networks. Int Trans Oper Res 2019; 26(3): 836-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/itor.12615]
[13]
Chandel ST, Sharma S. Deployment of multiple sink in different monitoring areas based on the optimization technique. Int J Sensors Wirel Commun Control 2020; 10(6): 915-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210327909666190821101606]
[14]
Chand S, Kumar B. Target coverage heuristic based on learning automata in wireless sensor networks. IET Wirel Sens Syst 2018; 8(3): 109-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2017.0090]
[15]
Musa A, Gonzalez V, Barragan D. A new strategy to optimize the sensors placement in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2019; 10(4): 1389-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0868-2]
[16]
Rai N, Daruwala R. Node density optimisation using composite probabilistic sensing model in wireless sensor networks. IET Wirel Sens Syst 2019; 9(4): 181-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2018.5048]
[17]
Elma KJ, Meenakshi S. Optimal coverage along with connectivity maintenance in heterogeneous Wireless sensor network. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2019; 1-12.
[18]
Tayeh GB, Makhoul A, Laiymani D, Demerjian J. A distributed real-time data prediction and adaptive sensing approach for Wireless sen-sor networks. Pervasive Mobile Comput 2018; 49: 62-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.06.007]
[19]
Nehra V, Sharma AK, Tripathi RK. I-deec: Improved deec for blanket coverage in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2019; 1-12.
[20]
Elhabyan R, Shi W, St-Hilaire M. Coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks: Review and future directions. J Commun Netw (Seoul) 2019; 21(1): 45-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JCN.2019.000005]
[21]
Hajizadeh N, Javidan R, Shamsinejad P, Akbari R. Node deployment in wireless sensor networks using the new multi-objective levy flight bee algorithm. IET Wirel Sens Syst 2020; 10(2): 78-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2019.0083]
[22]
Luo C, Hong Y, Li D, Wang Y, Chen W, Hu Q. Maximizing network lifetime using coverage sets scheduling in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 2020; 98: 102037.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.102037]
[23]
Sun Z, Zhang Y, Nie Y, Wei W, Lloret J, Song H. Casmoc: A novel complex alliance strategy with multiobjective optimization of coverage in wireless sensor networks. wireless. Networks 2017; 23(4): 1201-22.
[24]
Hanh NT, Binh HTT, Hoai NX, Palaniswami MS. An efficient genetic algorithm for maximizing area coverage in wireless sensor networks. Inf Sci 2019; 488: 58-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.059]
[25]
Cao L, Yue Y, Cai Y, Zhang Y. A novel coverage optimization strategy for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks based on connectivity and reliability IEEE Access 2021; 9: 18424-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053594]
[26]
Yardibi T, Karasan E. A distributed activity scheduling algorithm for wireless sensor networks with partial coverage. Wirel Netw 2010; 16(1): 213-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11276-008-0125-2]
[27]
Casta˜no F, Bourreau E, Rossi A, Sevaux M, Velasco N. Partial target coverage to extend the lifetime in wireless multi-role sensor net-works. Networks 2016; 68(1): 34-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/net.21682]
[28]
Yu J, Wan S, Cheng X, Yu D. Coverage contribution area based $ k $-coverage for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 2017; 66(9): 8510-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2681692]
[29]
Al-Karaki JN, Gawanmeh A. The optimal deployment, coverage, and connectivity problems in wireless sensor networks: Revisited. IEEE Access 2017; 5: 18051-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2740382]
[30]
Gupta S, Gupta S, Goyal D. Comparison of Q-coverage P-connectivity sensor node scheduling heuristic between battery powered WSN & energy harvesting WSN. Int J Sensors Wirel Commun Control 2021; 11(5): 553-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210327910999200710165007]
[31]
Khoufi I, Minet P, Laouiti A, Mahfoudh S. Survey of deployment algorithms in wireless sensor networks: Coverage and connectivity issues and challenges. Int J Auton Adapt Commun Syst 2017; 10(4): 341-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJAACS.2017.088774]
[32]
Das SK, Kapelko R. On the range assignment in wireless sensor networks for minimizing the coverage-connectivity cost. ACM Trans Sens Netw 2021; 17(4): 1-48. [TOSN].
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3457408]
[33]
Assad N, Elbhiri B, Faqihi MA, Ouadou M, Aboutajdine D. Efficient deployment quality analysis for intrusion detection in Wireless sen-sor networks. Wirel Netw 2016; 22(3): 991-1006.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1015-z]
[34]
Assad N, Zaimi I, Moujahdi C. Coverage quality analysis for 3D wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Advanced Wireless Technologies 1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3010089.3010109]
[35]
Zhang D, Li G, Zheng K, Ming X, Pan Z-H. An energybalanced routing method based on forward-aware factor for Wireless sensor net-works. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2014; 10(1): 766-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2013.2250910]
[36]
Gupta SK, Kuila P, Jana PK. Genetic algorithm approach for k-coverage and m-connected node placement in target based wireless sensor networks. Comput Electr Eng 2016; 56: 544-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.11.009]
[37]
Pananjady A, Bagaria VK, Vaze R. Optimally approximating the coverage lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 2016; 25(1): 98-111.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2016.2574563]
[38]
Boukerche A, Sun P. Connectivity and coverage based protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 2018; 80: 54-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.07.003]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
25
2
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy