Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Case Report

The Adjunctive Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Diagnosis and Follow Up of Uterovaginal Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Author(s): Gehad A. Saleh, Reham Alghandour, Eman Y. Rashad, Ahmed M. Tawfik and Ali H. Elmokadem*

Volume 17, Issue 9, 2021

Published on: 20 January, 2021

Page: [1159 - 1166] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1573405617666210120094711

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Lymphoma of the female gynecologic tract is extremely rare. Typically, lymphoma is managed nonsurgically unlike other non-lymphomatous malignant tumors raising the importance of differentiation between both entities.

Case Presentation: We describe the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) features of a case of uterovaginal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a 50-year-old postmenopausal woman emphasizing Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) as a diagnostic and follow up tool. We reviewed the literature regarding the diagnostic methods for female genital lymphoma. Forty-five cases, including our patient, were reviewed with an age range from 22 to 85 years. Vaginal bleeding was the most common presentation. The diagnosis was established by Papanicolaou smear, cervical biopsy (25/45), endometrial biopsy (6/45), vaginal biopsy (2/45), pelvic mass biopsy (2/45), iliac LN biopsy (1/45) and surgical diagnosis (8/45). Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL) constitute the vast majority of the cases (82%). The uterine cervix was involved at diagnosis in the majority of these cases (68%), while the uterine body (42%) and vagina (28%) were less involved. Pelvic lymphadenopathy was found in 15 cases, while extra genital lymphomatous infiltration in 13 cases. Sonographic findings were nonspecific, while CT provided excellent data about extra-genital involvement. Thirteen cases underwent pelvic MRI that displayed superior detection of disease extension and parametric involvement. Diffusion restriction was reported only in one case without quantitative analysis of ADC map.

Conclusion: MRI shows unique features that differentiate uterovaginal lymphoma from the much more common carcinomas and discriminate post-operative changes from tumor recurrence. It exhibits a marked restricted diffusion pattern with lower ADC values than carcinomas and post-operative changes.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion weighted imaging, uterine, cervical, vaginal, lymphoma.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Onyiuke I, Kirby AB, McCarthy S. Primary gynecologic lymphoma: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201(4): W648-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8907] [PMID: 24059405]
[2]
Brocker KA, Alt CD, Eichbaum M, Sohn C, Kauczor H-U, Hallscheidt P. Imaging of female pelvic malignancies regarding MRI, CT, and PET/CT: part 1. Strahlenther Onkol 2011; 187(10): 611-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-011-4001-0] [PMID: 21947126]
[3]
Yamamoto T, Morita K, Iriyama N, et al. Intravascular large B- cell lymphoma of the uterus: a case with favorable clinical outcome. Int J Surg Pathol 2011; 19(5): 672-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066896909346273] [PMID: 19948641]
[4]
Hadi E, Bruchim I, Helman I, et al. Sonographic appearance of uterine lymphoma: case report and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound 2015; 43(1): 59-63.
[PMID: 24796529]
[5]
Sohaib SA, Verma H, Attygalle AD, Ind TEJ. Imaging of uterine malignancies. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. Elsevier.. 2010; 377-87.
[6]
Heo SH, Shin SS, Kim JW, et al. Pre-treatment diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor recurrence in uterine cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation: value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14(4): 616-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.4.616] [PMID: 23901319]
[7]
Gladwish A, Milosevic M, Fyles A, et al. Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radical chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology 2016; 279(1): 158-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150400] [PMID: 26505922]
[8]
Thoeny HC, Ross BD. Predicting and monitoring cancer treatment response with diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32(1): 2-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22167] [PMID: 20575076]
[9]
Hameeduddin A, Sahdev A. Diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in assessing response and recurrent disease in gynaecological malignancies. Cancer Imaging 2015; 15(1): 3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-015-0037-1] [PMID: 25889065]
[10]
Rohena-Quinquilla IR, Lattin GE Jr, Wolfman D. Imaging of extranodal genitourinary lymphoma. Radiol Clin North Am 2016; 54(4): 747-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2016.03.009] [PMID: 27265606]
[11]
Ahmad AK, Hui P, Litkouhi B, et al. Institutional review of primary non-hodgkin lymphoma of the female genital tract: a 33-year experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014; 24(7): 1250-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000201] [PMID: 25010039]
[12]
Johannesson L, Mason J, Miller J, Selva-Nayagam S, Oehler MK. Primary non-hodgkin’s lymphomas of the uterus and uterine cervix. Oncol Cancer Case Rep 2017; 3(127): 2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2471-8556.1000127]
[13]
Cubo AM, Soto ZM, Cruz MÁ, et al. Primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma of the uterine cervix successfully treated by combined chemotherapy alone: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(19): e6846.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006846] [PMID: 28489772]
[14]
Goto N, Oishi-Tanaka Y, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Minami M. Magnetic resonance findings of primary uterine malignant lymphoma. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6(1): 7-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.6.7] [PMID: 17510537]
[15]
Ustaalioglu BBO, Bilici A, Seker M, et al. Primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma of cervix successfully treated with rituximab: positron emission tomography images before and after therapy: a case report. Leuk Res 2010; 34(4): e108-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2009.10.020] [PMID: 19931906]
[16]
Upanal N, Enjeti A. Primary lymphoma of the uterus and cervix: two case reports and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51(6): 559-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01365.x] [PMID: 21923699]
[17]
Liu Y, Ye Z, Sun H, Bai R. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25(6): 1073-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000472] [PMID: 25966933]
[18]
Addley H, Moyle P, Freeman S. Diffusion-weighted imaging in gynaecological malignancy. Clin Radiol 2017; 72(11): 981-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.014] [PMID: 28842113]
[19]
Jalaguier-Coudray A, Villard-Mahjoub R, Delouche A, et al. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of pathologic complete response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective observational study. Radiology 2017; 284(2): 432-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161299] [PMID: 28301309]
[20]
Thyagarajan MS, Dobson MJ, Biswas A. Case report: appearance of uterine cervical lymphoma on MRI: a case report and review of the literature. Br J Radiol 2004; 77(918): 512-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/58044417] [PMID: 15151974]
[21]
Chan JK, Loizzi V, Magistris A, et al. Clinicopathologic features of six cases of primary cervical lymphoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(3 Pt 1): 866-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.044] [PMID: 16150291]
[22]
Hariprasad R, Kumar L, Bhatla DMN, Kukreja M, Papaiah S. Primary uterine lymphoma: report of 2 cases and review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(1): 308-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.04.002] [PMID: 16813759]
[23]
Frey NV, Svoboda J, Andreadis C, et al. Primary lymphomas of the cervix and uterus: the University of Pennsylvania’s experience and a review of the literature. Leuk Lymphoma 2006; 47(9): 1894-901.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10428190600687653] [PMID: 17065003]
[24]
Cohn DE, Resnick KE, Eaton LA, deHart J, Zanagnolo V. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma mimicking gynecological malignancies of the vagina and cervix: a report of four cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17(1): 274-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00747.x] [PMID: 17291267]
[25]
Bural GG, Shriaknthan S, Houseni M, Alavi A. FDG-PET is useful in staging and follow-up of primary uterine cervical lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med 2007; 32(9): 748-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e318124fd89] [PMID: 17710038]
[26]
Ab Hamid S, Wastie ML. Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma presenting as a uterine cervical mass. Singapore Med J 2008; 49(3): e73-5.
[PMID: 18362991]
[27]
Su CF, Tsai HJ, Kuo C, et al. Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the uterus, cervix and parametrium treated by combined immunochemotherapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34(4 Pt 2): 749-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00919.x] [PMID: 18840196]
[28]
Baijal G, Vadiraja BM, Fernandes DJ, Vidyasagar MS. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the uterine cervix: a rare case managed novelly. J Cancer Res Ther 2009; 5(2): 140-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.52784] [PMID: 19542675]
[29]
Rajnics P, Demeter J, Csomor J, et al. Rare primary extranodal lymphomas: diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of the genital tract. Ann Hematol 2009; 88(12): 1223-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-009-0741-7] [PMID: 19352660]
[30]
Hanley KZ, Tadros TS, Briones AJ, Birdsong GG, Mosunjac MB. Hematologic malignancies of the female genital tract diagnosed on liquid-based Pap test: Cytomorphologic features and review of differential diagnoses. Diagn Cytopathol 2009; 37(1): 61-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.20994] [PMID: 18973127]
[31]
Samama M, van Poelgeest M. Primary malignant lymphoma of the uterus: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol 2011; 4(3): 560-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000334852] [PMID: 22220150]
[32]
Kanaan D, Parente DB, Constantino CPL, de Souza RC. Lymphoma of uterine cervix: magnetic resonance imaging findings. Radiol Bras 2012; 45(3): 167-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842012000300009]
[33]
Parnis J, Camilleri DJ, Babic D, DeGaetano J, Savona-Ventura C. Lymphoma of the cervix. Case Rep Hematol 2012; 2012: 326127.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/326127]
[34]
Binesh F, Karimi zarchi M, Vahedian H, Rajabzadeh Y. Primary malignant lymphoma of the uterine cervix. BMJ Case Rep 2012; 2012: bcr2012006675.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-006675] [PMID: 23008373]
[35]
Mandato VD, Palermo R, Falbo A, et al. Primary diffuse large B- cell lymphoma of the uterus: case report and review. Anticancer Res 2014; 34(8): 4377-90.
[PMID: 25075075]
[36]
Chen R, Yu Z, Zhang H, Ding J, Chen B. Primary malignant lymphoma of the uterus and broad ligament: a case report and review of literature. OncoTargets Ther 2015; 8: 265-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S78171] [PMID: 25674001]
[37]
Razmjooy N, Ashourian M, Karimifard M, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of skin cancer: a review. Curr Med Imaging 2020; 16(7): 781-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666200129095242]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
32
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy