Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam-Fentanyl in Procedural Analgesia Sedation for Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author(s): Kambiz Masoumi, Seyyed Javad Maleki, Arash Forouzan, Ali Delirrooyfard*, Saeed Hesam.

Journal Name: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Volume 14 , Issue 4 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Shoulder joint dislocation is the most common dislocation of joints in the body. To reduce the anterior shoulder dislocation, it is necessary to have analgesia and sedation.

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, patients were divided into two equal groups. Group I received midazolam-fentanyl (0.05 mg/kg fentanyl at a dose of 1 µg/kg) for 10 minutes and group II received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg in the initial dose and then 0.2 µg/kg/h) for 10 minutes. The levels of analgesia according to VAS criteria and the time to reach desired sedation were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 60 patients participated in this study. The time to reach the desired sedation was 8.60 ± 2.3 minutes in the dexmedetomidine group and 11.27 ± 3.57 minutes in the midazolamfentanyl group (p= 0.001). Also, the VAS score in both midazolam-fentanyl and dexmedetomidine groups was 3.3 ± 1.24 and 2.57 ± 0.9, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (p=0.015). There was significant relationship between the time to reach desired sedation and the level of analgesia. Moreover, there was no significant difference between patient age and the time to reach the desired level of analgesia. During this study, no side effect was observed.

Conclusion: The findings of this study show that dexmedetomidine provides a higher level of analgesia than midazolam-fentanyl. Moreover, it was also shown that dexmedetomidine causes quicker procedural sedation than midazolam-fentanyl.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, pain management, sedation, shoulder dislocation, randomized clinical trial, analgesia.

[1]
Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74(4): 491-500.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274040-00004] [PMID: 1583043]
[2]
Robinson CM, Seah M, Akhtar MA. The epidemiology, risk of recurrence, and functional outcome after an acute traumatic posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(17): 1605-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00973] [PMID: 21915575]
[3]
Rouleau DM, Hebert-Davies J, Robinson CM. Acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22(3): 145-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-03-145] [PMID: 24603824]
[4]
Chong M, Karataglis D, Learmonth D. Survey of the management of acute traumatic first-time anterior shoulder dislocation among trauma clinicians in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88(5): 454-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588406X117115] [PMID: 17002849]
[5]
Mwipatayi BP, Finlayson A, Welman CJ, Hamilton MJ, Abbas M, Sieunarine K. Axillary artery and brachial plexus injuries due to anterior shoulder dislocation. Eur J Trauma 2005; 31(2): 181-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-005-1435-z]
[6]
Gilotra MN, Christian MW, Lovering RM. Rotator cuff tear consequent to glenohumeral dislocation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46(8): 708.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2016.0413] [PMID: 27477475]
[7]
Visser CP, Coene LN, Brand R, Tavy DL. The incidence of nerve injury in anterior dislocation of the shoulder and its influence on functional recovery. A prospective clinical and EMG study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81(4): 679-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B4.9005] [PMID: 10463745]
[8]
Chung C. Closed reduction techniques for acute anterior shoulder dislocation: From Egyptians to Australians. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2004; 11(3): 178-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102490790401100309]
[9]
Fedor KL. Noninvasive respiratory support in infants and children. Respir Care 2017; 62(6): 699-717.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05244] [PMID: 28546373]
[10]
Ozturk TC, Guneysel O, Akoglu H. Anterior shoulder dislocation reduction managed either with midazolam or propofol in combination with fentanyl. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2014; 21(6): 346-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102490791402100602]
[11]
Pacifici GM. Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in neonates and children: Effect of disease-a review. Int J Pediatr 2014. 2014: Article ID 309342
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/309342] [PMID: 24696691]
[12]
Taylor DM, O’Brien D, Ritchie P, Pasco J, Cameron PA. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation Academic emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12(1): 13-9.
[13]
Gerlach AT, Dasta JF. Dexmedetomidine: An updated review. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41(2): 245-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1345/aph.1H314] [PMID: 17299013]
[14]
Jewett J, Phillips WJ. Dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation in the emergency department. EJEM 2010; 17(1): 60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283325ec2]
[15]
Venn RM, Hell J, Grounds RM. Respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in the surgical patient requiring intensive care. Crit Care 2000; 4(5): 302-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc712] [PMID: 11056756]
[16]
Miller JB, Schoenberg MR, Bilder RM. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): considerations for neuropsychological research. Clin Neuropsychol 2014; 28(4): 575-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.907445] [PMID: 24766549]
[17]
Zeyneloglu P, Pirat A, Candan S, Kuyumcu S, Tekin I, Arslan G. Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25(12): 961-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265021508004699] [PMID: 18538051]
[18]
Wang X, Liu W, Xu Z, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine alone for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A consort-prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(19)e3639
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003639] [PMID: 27175680]
[19]
Cho JS, Shim JK, Na S, Park I, Kwak YL. Improved sedation with dexmedetomidine-remifentanil compared with midazolam-remifentanil during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled trial. EP Europace 2014; 16(7): 1000-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut365]
[20]
Rasheed MA, Punera DC, Bano M, Palaria U, Tyagi A, Sharma S. A study to compare the overall effectiveness between midazolam and dexmedetomidine during monitored anesthesia care: A randomized prospective study. Anesth Essays Res 2015; 9(2): 167-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.156299] [PMID: 26417122]
[21]
Yu C, Li S, Deng F, Yao Y, Qian L. Comparison of dexmedetomidine/fentanyl with midazolam/fentanyl combination for sedation and analgesia during tooth extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43(9): 1148-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.019] [PMID: 24794760]


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 14
ISSUE: 4
Year: 2019
Page: [269 - 274]
Pages: 6
DOI: 10.2174/1574887114666190809160419
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 29
HTML: 2
PRC: 1