Diagnosis of Lower Genital Tract Infection in Pregnancy: Routine Midtrimester High Vaginal Swab Followed by Gram Staining, Seems to be the Best Strategy

Author(s): Vidyashree Ganesh Poojari, Akhila Vasudeva*, Samantha Dawson, Geetha Kaipa, Vandana Eshwara, Chaitanya Tellapragada, Pratap Kumar.

Journal Name: Current Women`s Health Reviews

Volume 15 , Issue 4 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Background: Screening of lower genital tract infection (LGTI) in mid-trimester prevents preterm birth (PTB). There is no consensus on best screening methods for LGTI-symptoms, speculum findings, a point of care tests or high vaginal swab microscopy.

Aim: To know diagnostic accuracy of screening of lower genital tract infection (LGTI) in midtrimester by clinical symptom/signs and point of care tests (viz Amsel’s criteria) as against the gold standard microscopic tests using gram stain.

Settings and Design: Prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital over two years. The study population included 228 antenatal women between 18th-24th weeks.

Materials and Methods: Symptoms of vaginal discharge were noted. Speculum examination was performed on all, to detect the type of discharge. High vaginal swabs were collected, subjected to the point of care tests (Amsel’s criteria) as well as gram staining. Microscopy (Eg: Nugent’s criteria) was taken as the gold standard, to which other methods were compared.

Results: Thirty women (13.5%) were symptomatic. Among 198 that were asymptomatic, 91(45.92%) had LGTI. Speculum examination showed discharge in 221 (96.9%), but gram staining showed LGTI in only 104 (45.61%), among whom 45 (19.7%) had partial Bacterial vaginosis (BV), 14(6.1%) had full BV, and 40(17.5%) had candidiasis. The commonest discharge was homogenous thin white, suggestive of BV but 51% among them had normal vaginal flora (NVF); whereas 27% of those labelled physiological discharge were positive for BV. The appearance of discharge and gram stain thus did not correlate well. Amsel’s criteria had poor diagnostic accuracy compared to Nugent’s, although negative predictive value were high.

Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of LGTI, especially BV among asymptomatic pregnant women at mid-trimester, best detected with a routine high vaginal swab and gram staining rather than relying on symptoms/speculum findings/point of care tests. Such testing may guide appropriate treatment for reducing the risk of PTB.

Keywords: Lower genital tract infection, bacterial vaginosis, vaginal discharge, screening, amsel's criteria, nugent’s criteria.

Georgiou HM, Di Quinzio MKW, Permezel M, Brennecke SP. Predicting preterm labour: Current status and future prospects. Dis Markers 2015; 2015Article ID 435014
Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: A systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012; 379: 2162-72.
Lamont RF. Advances in the prevention of infection-related preterm birth. Frontiers in immunology. Front Immunol 2015; 6: 566.
Sangkomkamhang US, Lumbiganon P, Prasertcharoensuk W, Laopaiboon M. Antenatal lower genital tract infection screening and treatment programs for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (2): CD006178
Lee AC, Quaiyum MA, Mullany LC, et al. Screening and treatment of maternal genitourinary tract infections in early pregnancy to prevent preterm birth in rural Sylhet, Bangladesh: A cluster randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 326.
Nwankwo TO, Aniebue UU, Umeh UA. Syndromic diagnosis in evaluation of women with symptoms of vaginitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2017; 19: 3.
Zemouri C, Wi TE, Kiarie J, et al. The performance of the vaginal discharge syndromic management in treating vaginal and cervical infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11(10)e0163365
Mengistie Z, Woldeamanuel Y, Asrat D, Adera A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Tikur Anbessa University Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 822.
Abdelaziz ZA, Ibrahim ME, Bilal NE, Hamid ME. Vaginal infections among pregnant women at Omdurman Maternity Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. J Infect Dev Ctries 2014; 8(4): 490-7.
Krauss-Silva L, Almada-Horta A, Alves MB, Camacho KG, Moreira ME, Braga A. Basic vaginal pH, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis: Prevalence in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, a prospective study in a low socioeconomic and multiethnic South American population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 107.
Akoh CC, Pressman EK, Cooper E, Queenan RA, Pillittere J, O’Brien KO. Prevalence and risk factors for infections in a pregnant adolescent population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2017; 30(1): 71-5.
Lima TM, Teles LR, de Oliveira A, et al. [Vaginal discharge in pregnant women: comparison between syndromic approach and examination of clinical nursing practice]. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2013; 47(6): 1265-71.
Mohammadzadeh F, Dolatian M, Jorjani M, Majd HA. Diagnostic value of Amsel’s clinical criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Glob J Health Sci 2014; 7(3): 8-14.
Mengistie Z, Woldeamanuel Y, Asrat D, Yigeremu M. Comparison of clinical and gram stain diagnosis methods of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Ethiopia. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7(12): 2701-3.
Gupta A, Garg P, Nigam S. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (<28 Weeks) and its effect on pregnancy outcome: A study from a Western UP city. Indian J Clin Pract 2013; 23(11): 740-4.
Tellapragada C, Vandana KE, Bhat PV, et al. Lower genital tract infections during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A hospital based observational cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14(Suppl. 3).E35
Tellapragada C, Eshwara VK, Bhat P, Kamath A, Aletty S, Mukhopadhyay C. Screening of vulvovaginal infections during pregnancy in resource constrained settings: Implications on preterm delivery. J Infect Public Health 2017; 10(4): 431-7.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Page: [277 - 283]
Pages: 7
DOI: 10.2174/1573404815666190603113717
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 23