A Narrative Review of Diabetes Group Visits in Low-Income and Underserved Settings

Author(s): Elizabeth M. Vaughan* , Craig A. Johnston , Katherine R. Arlinghaus , David J. Hyman , John P. Foreyt .

Journal Name: Current Diabetes Reviews

Volume 15 , Issue 5 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer


Background: Prior studies have supported the efficacy of diabetes group visits. However, the benefit of diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals is not clear. The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review in order to clarify the efficacy of diabetes group visits in low-income and underserved settings.

Methods: The authors performed a narrative review, categorizing studies into nonrandomized and randomized.

Results: A total of 14 studies were identified. Hemoglobin A1c was the most commonly measured outcome, which improved for the majority of group visit participants. Preventive care showed consistent improvement for intervention arms. There were several other study outcomes including metabolic (i.e., blood pressure), behavioral (i.e., exercise), functional (i.e., quality of life), and system-based (i.e., cost).

Conclusion: Diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals resulted in superior preventive care but the impact on glycemic control remains unclear.

Keywords: Group visits, diabetes, low-income, underserved, chronic disease, shared medical appointments.

World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes. Geneva, CH: World Health Organization 2016.
Riley SB, Marshall ES. Group visits in diabetes care: A systematic review. Diabetes Educ 2010; 36(6): 936-44.
Edelman D, Gierisch JM, McDuffie JR, Oddone E, Williams JW. Shared medical appointments for patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30(1): 99-106.
Burke RE, O’Grady ET. Group visits hold great potential for improving diabetes care and outcomes, but best practices must be developed. Health Aff 2012; 31(1): 103-9.
Davis A, Sawyer DR, Vinci LM. The potential of group visits in diabetes care. Clin Diabetes 2008; 26(2): 58-62.
Burke RE, Ferrara SA, Fuller AM, Kelderhouse JM, Ferrara LR. The effectiveness of group medical visits on diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) specific outcomes in adults: A systematic review. JBI Library Syst Rev 2011; 9(23): 833-85.
Housden L, Wong ST, Dawes M. Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2013; 185(13): E635-44.
Clancy DE, Dismuke CE, Magruder KM, Simpson KN, Bradford D. Do diabetes group visits lead to lower medical care charges? Am J Manag Care 2008; 14(1): 39-44.
Kirk JK, Devoid HM, Strickland CG. Educational strategies of diabetes group medical visits: A review. Curr Diab Rev 2018; 14(3): 227-36.
Purnell TS, Calhoun EA, Golden SH, et al. Achieving health equity: Closing the gaps in health care disparities, interventions, and research. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(8): 1410-5.
Dinca-Panaitescu S, Dinca M, Bryant T, Raphael D. Diabetes prevalence and income: Results of the Canadian Community Health Survey. Health Policy 2011; 99(2): 116-23.
Gaskin DJ, Thorpe RJ Jr, McGinty EE, et al. Disparities in diabetes: The nexus of race, poverty, and place. Am J Public Health 2014; 104(11): 2147-55.
Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L, Ongolo-Zogo P, Lang T. The challenges and opportunities of conducting a clinical trial in a low resource setting: The case of the Cameroon mobile phone SMS (CAMPS) trial, an investigator initiated trial. Trials 2011; 12: 145.
Kunutsor SK, Walley J. Randomized controlled trial designs for operations research in low-income countries: Reality or delusion? Front Public Health 2013; 1(14)
Onder G. The advantages and limitations of observational studies. G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 2013; 14(3)(Suppl. 1): 35-9.
Institute of Medicine (US) committee on standards for systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research; Editors: Eden J Levit L Berg A Morton S. Finding what works in health care:. Standards for systematic reviews. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2011.
Handley MA, Schillinger D, Shiboski S. Quasi-experimental designs in practice-based research settings: Design and implementation considerations. J Am Board Fam Med 2011; 24(5): 589-96.
Bray P, Roupe M, Young S, Harrell J, Cummings DM, Whetstone LM. Feasibility and effectiveness of system redesign for diabetes care management in rural areas: The Eastern North Carolina experience. Diabetes Educ 2005; 31(5): 712-8.
Bray P, Thompson D, Wynn JD, Cummings DM, Whetstone L. Confronting disparities in diabetes care: The clinical effectiveness of redesigning care management for minority patients in rural primary care practices. J Rural Health 2005; 21(4): 317-21.
Culhane-Pera KA, Peterson KA, Crain AL, et al. Group visits for Hmong adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pre-post analysis. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2005; 16(2): 315-27.
Mouanoutoua VL, Brown L. Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25, Hmong Version: A screening instrument for psychological distress. J Pers Assess 1995; 64(2): 376-83.
Mallow JA, Theeke LA, Whetsel T, Barnes ER. Diabetes group medical visits and outcomes of care in low-income, rural, uninsured persons. Open J Nurs 2013; 3(3): 314-22.
Mallow JA, Theeke LA, Barnes ER, Whetsel T. Examining dose of diabetes group medical visits and characteristics of the uninsured. West J Nurs Res 2015; 37(8): 1033-61.
Vachon GC, Ezike N, Brown-Walker M, Chhay V, Pikelny I, Pendergraft TB. Improving access to diabetes care in an inner-city, community-based outpatient health center with a monthly open-access, multistation group visit program. J Natl Med Assoc 2007; 99(12): 1327-36.
Dickman K, Pinz C, Gold K, Kivlahan C. Behavior changes in patients with diabetes and hypertension after experiencing shared medical appointments. J American Acad Nurse Practiioners 2011; 2012(24): 43-51.
Jessee BT, Rutledge CM. Effectiveness of nurse practitioner coordinated team group visits for type 2 diabetes in medically underserved Appalachia. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2012; 24(12): 735-43.
Reitz JA, Sarfaty M, Diamond JJ, Salzman B. The effects of a group visit program on outcomes of diabetes care in an urban family practice. J Urban Health 2012; 89(4): 709-16.
Berry DC, Williams W, Hall EG, Heroux R, Bennett-Lewis T. Imbedding interdiciplinary diabetes group visits into a community-based medical setting. Diabetes Educ 2015; 42(1): 96-107.
Stanford chronic disease self-management study psychometrics of the chronic disease self-management program questionnaire; Editors: Lorig K,, Stewart A,, Ritter P,, Gonzalez V,, Laurent D,, Eds. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications; 1996.
Clancy DE, Brown SB, Magruder KM, Huang P. Group visits in medically and economically disadvantaged patients with type 2 daibetes and their relationships to clinical outcomes. Top Health Inf Manage 2003; 24(1): 8-14.
Clancy DE, Huang P, Cope DW, Wolfman TE, Magruder KM. Evaluating concordance to American Diabetes Association standards of care for type 2 diabetes through group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 2032-6.
Clancy DE, Cope DW, Magruder KM, Huang P, Salter KH, Fields AW. Evaluating group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2003; 29(2): 292-302.
Clancy DE, Huang P, Okonofua E, Yeager D, Magruder KM. Group visits: Promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22(5): 620-4.
Clancy DE, Yeager DE, Huang P, Magruder KM. Further evaluating the acceptability of group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33(2): 309-14.
Shi L, Starfield B, Xu J. Validating the adult primary care assessment tool. J Fam Pract 2001; 50: 161-70.
Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Structure and correlates of diabetes-specific locus of control. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 994-1001.
Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the trust in physician scale: A measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep 1990; 67: 1091-100.
Gutierrez N, Gimpel NE, Dallo FJ, Foster BM, Ohagi EJ. Shared medical appointments in a residency clinic: An exploratory study among Hispanics with diabetes. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17(6): e212-4.
Schillinger D, Wang F, Handley M, Hammer H. Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 559-66.
Wallace A, Perkhounkova Y, Tseng H, Schillinger D. Influence of patient characteristics on assessment of diabetes self-management support. Nurs Res 2013; 62(2): 106-14.
Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Green SM. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care. Med Care 2005; 43(436): 436-44.
Vaughan EM, Johnston CA, Moreno JP, Cardenas VC, Foreyt JP. Integrating CHWs as part of the team leading diabetes group visits: A randomized controlled feasibility study. Diabetes Educ 2017; 43(6): 589-99.
Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, et al. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: A system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(4): 695-700.
Wee HL, Cheung YB, Li SC, Fong KY, Thumboo J. The impact of diabetes mellitus and other chronic medical conditions on health-related quality of life: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Health Qual Life 2005; 3: 2.
Schoen C, Osborn R, How SK, Doty MM, Peugh J. In chronic condition: Experiences of patients with complex health care needs, in eight countries, 2008. Health Aff 2009; 28(1): w1-w16.
Frood S, Johnston LM, Matteson CL, Finegood DT. Obesity, complexity, and the role of the health system. Curr Obes Rep 2013; 2(4): 320-6.
Kuo CR, Quan J, Kim S, Tang AH, Heuerman DP, Murphy EJ. Group visits to encourage insulin initiation: Targeting patient barriers. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26(11-12): 1705-13.
Yeaw J, Lee WC, Aagren M, Christensen T. Cost of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the United States among patients on an insulin regimen for diabetes. J Manag Care Pharm 2012; 18(1): 21-32.
Agiostratidou G, Anhalt H, Ball D, et al. Standardizing clinically meaningful outcome measures beyond HbA1c for type 1 diabetes: A consensus report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange. Diabetes Care 2017; 40(12): 1622-30.
Leung AK, Buckley K, Kurtz J. Sustainability of clinical benefits gained during a multidisciplinary diabetes shared medical appointment after patients return to usual care. Clin Diabetes 2018; 36(3): 226-31.
Wong ST, Browne A, Lavoie J, Macleod MLP, Chongo M, Ulrich C. Incorporating group medical visits into primary healthcare: Are there benefits? Health Policy 2015; 11(2): 27-42.
Pallas SW, Minhas D, Perez-Escamilla RP, Taylor L, Curry L, Bradley EH. Community Health Workers in low- and middle-income countries: What do we know about scaling up and sustainability? Am J Public Health 2013; 103(7): e74-82.
Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Gruppen LD, Funnell MM, Oh MS. The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF). Diabetes Care 2003; 26(5): 1641-2.
Garcia AA, Villagomez ET, Brown SA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. The starr county diabetes education study: development of the spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(1 and 5): 16-21 and 972..
University of Michigan Diabetes Research Center. Survey Instruments: Diabetes Knowledge Test. Last accesssed November 1, 2018.Available from. http://diabetesresearch.med.umich. edu/Tools_SurveyInstruments.php#dkt
Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26(7): 724-35.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385-401.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SDA. 12-Item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34(3): 220-33.
Burroughs TE, Desikan R, Waterman BM, Gilin D, McGill J. Development and validation of the diabetes quality of life brief clinical inventory. Diabetes Spectr 2004; 17(1): 41-9.
Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: Results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 943-50.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. Diabetes Care 2017; 40(S1): S1-S134.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Published Recommendations. Last accesssed November 1. 2018.Available from. https://www. uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Index/browse-recommendations
Behavrioal Risk Factor Surveillance System. Behavioral risk factor surveillance survey: Comparability of data BRFSS 2013.Atlanta, GA, US:. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;. 2013.
Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Green SM. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care. Med Care 2005; 43(436): 436-44.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Page: [372 - 381]
Pages: 10
DOI: 10.2174/1573399814666181112145910
Price: $58

Article Metrics

PDF: 33
PRC: 1