Resource Mining for a Bioreactor Landfill

Author(s): Jay N. Meegoda*, Ameenah Soliman, Patrick A. Hettiaratchi, Michael Agbakpe.

Journal Name: Current Environmental Engineering
Continued as Current Environmental Management

Volume 6 , Issue 1 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Background: A new generation of the sustainable landfill is designed to achieve sustainable Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management. It is hybrid anaerobic/aerobic biodegradation landfill followed by landfill mining. However, there is limited information on landfill mining, especially the criteria and process for the practitioner to determine the end of the landfill biodegradation to commence landfill mining.

Objective: Hence the overall objective of this research was to develop a comprehensive resource mining plan for bioreactor landfills.

Method: When waste decomposition becomes slower or stopped, the landfill can be mined to recover resources and utilize the recovered space. The amount of the gas generated, landfill temperature and landfill settlement are indirect measures of landfill activity. Also, the concentration of cellulose (C), hemicelluloses (H), and lignin (L) can describe the biodegradable fractions of waste. Hence the biodegradation in landfills can be monitored by recording the change in methane production, temperature, settlement and the (C+H)/L ratio of waste. Once methane recovery is minimal, landfill reaches a maximum settlement and, ambient temperature plus the (C+H)/L value reaches a stable value of 0.25 indicating end of biodegradation. At this point landfill resources including compost material, non-recoverable waste, and recyclables such as plastics, metal and glass can be mined and recovered. Compost and recyclables can be sold at market value and the non-recovered waste with high energy content can be used as refuse-derived fuel. Once the landfill has been mined space can be reused thus eliminating the need to allocate valuable land for new landfills.

Result: The landfill mining detailed in this manuscript utilizes principles from single stream type recycling facilities to ensure feasibility. The first landfill will be excavated and screened to separate the biodegraded soil and compost fraction from the recyclables. Then the screened recyclable materials are transported for further processing in a single stream type separation facility where they will be separated, bundled and sold.

Conclusion: A cost calculation was performed for the resource mining of Calgary Biocell and if the mined resources are sold at market values, then the mining of Calgary Biocell would generate approximately $4M.

Keywords: Biocell, bioreactor, landfill mining, recyclables, biodegradation, methane production, single stream recycling.

USEPA. Advancing sustainable materials management: Facts and figures 2013. United States Environ Prot Agency 2015; pp. 1-16.
Warith M, Li X, Jin H. Bioreactor landfills: State-of-the-art review. Emirates J Eng Res 2005; 10(1): 1-14.
Reinhart DR, Townsend TG. Landfill Bioreactor Design & Operation. CRC Press 1997.
Yolo County Division of Integrated Waste Management, Trash to Cash-Controlled Landfill Bioreactor Project. July 1998.
USEPA. USEPA Project Buncombe County Bioreactor Project Buncombe County Solid Waste Management Facility Alexander, North Carolina. EPA, 2012 Mid-year Progress report. July 2012.
Hettiaratchi J, Meegoda J, Hsieh H, Hunte C. Sustainable management of household solid waste. Int J Environ Waste Manag 2010; 6(1-2): 96-106.
Hsieh H, Meegoda J, Hettiarachi J, El Haggar S, Stressel R. Towards the development of sustainable landfills. GeoCongress 2008: Geotechnics of Waste Management and Remediation In: 2008; pp. 344-51.
Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil SA, Alaniz VM. Integrated solid waste management: Engineering principles and management issues: McGraw-Hill New York; 1993.
Rathje WL, Murphy C. Rubbish!: The archaeology of garbage. University of Arizona Press 2001.
Barlaz MA, Ham RK, Schaefer DM, Isaacson R. Methane production from municipal refuse: A review of enhancement techniques and microbial dynamics. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 1990; 19(6): 557-84.
Hilger HH, Barlaz MA. Anaerobic decomposition of refuse in landfills and methane oxidation in landfill covers Manual of Environmental Microbiology. 3rd ed. American Society of Microbiology 2007; pp. 818-42.
Colberg P. Anaerobic microbial degradation of cellulose, lignin, oligolignols, and monoaromatic lignin derivatives. In:Wiley series in ecological and applied microbiology Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. New York: Wiley 1988; pp. 333-72.
Barlaz MA, Ham RK, Schaefer DM. Mass-balance analysis of anaerobically decomposed refuse. J Environ Eng 1989; 115(6): 1088-102.
Alexander A, Burklin C, Singleton A. Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM) version 302 user’s guide. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development 2005.
Hettiarachchi H, Hettiaratchi J, Hunte C, Meegoda J. Operation of a landfill bioreactor in a cold climate: Early results and lessons learned. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 2012; 17(4): 307-16.
El-Fadel M, Khoury R. Modeling settlement in MSW landfills: A critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2000; 30(3): 327-61.
Wall DK, Zeiss C. Municipal landfill biodegradation and settlement. J Environ Eng 1995; 121(3): 214-24.
Hettiarachchi C, Meegoda J, Hettiaratchi J. Towards a fundamental model to predict the settlements in bioreactor landfills. In: Waste Containment and Remediation 2005: pp. 1-15.
Hettiarachchi CH, Meegoda JN, Hettiaratchi JPA. Prediction of waste settlement in bioreactor landfills incorporating waste biodegradation. In: Geoenvironmental Engineering 2007: pp. 1-10.
Hettiarachchi CH, Meegoda JN, Tavantzis J, Hettiaratchi P. Numerical model to predict settlements coupled with landfill gas pressure in bioreactor landfills. J Hazard Mater 2007; 139(3): 514-22.
Hettiarachchi H, Meegoda J, Hettiaratchi P. Effects of gas and moisture on modeling of bioreactor landfill settlement. Waste Manag 2009; 29(3): 1018-25.
Hunte C, Hettiaratchi J, Hettiarachchi C, Meegoda J. Determination of waste properties from settlement behaviour of a full scale waste cell operated as a landfill bioreactor. In: Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering 2011: pp. 1404-13.
Hunte C, Hettiarachchi C, Meegoda J, Hettiaratchi J. The city of calgary biocell landfill: Data collection and settlement predictions using a multiphase model. In: GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering 2012: pp. 4202-11.
Hunte C, Hettiaratchi P, Meegoda JN, Hettiarachchi CH. Settlement of bioreactor landfills during filling operation. In: Geoenvironmental Engineering 2007: pp. 1-10.
Hunte C, Hettiaratchi J, Meegoda J, Hettiarachchi C. Performance of a waste cell in cold climate operated as an anaerobic landfill bioreactor. In: Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering 2011: pp. 1276-86.
Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Kjeldsen P, Gabr MA, Borden RC. Critical evaluation of factors required to terminate the postclosure monitoring period at solid waste landfills. Environ Sci Technol 2002; 36(16): 3457-64.
Hossain M, Gabr M, Barlaz M. Relationship of compressibility parameters to municipal solid waste decomposition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2003; 129(12): 1151-8.
Hossain M. Mechanics of Compressibility and Strength of Solid Waste in Bioreactor Landfills Thesis. A thesis submitted to North Carolina State University at Raleigh 2002.
Barlaz M. Microbial and chemical dynamics during refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison; 1988.
Van Passel S, Dubois M, Eyckmans J, et al. The economics of enhanced landfill mining: Private and societal performance drivers. J Clean Prod 2013; 55: 92-102.
Kieckhäfer K, Breitenstein A, Spengler TS. Material flow-based economic assessment of landfill mining processes. Waste Manag 2017; 60: 748-64.
Krook J, Svensson N, Eklund M. Landfill mining: A critical review of two decades of research. Waste Manag 2012; 32(3): 513-20.
Jones PT, Geysen D, Tielemans Y, et al. Enhanced landfill mining in view of multiple resource recovery: A critical review. J Clean Prod 2013; 55: 45-55.
Murphy RJ, Stessel RI, Brennan TJ. Optimization of Landfill Mining: State University System of Florida. Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste 1991.
Zee DJ, Achterkamp MC, de Visser B. Assessing the opportunities of landfill mining. University of Groningen 2003.
Hogland WMM, Nimmermark S. Landfill mining and waste characterization: A strategy for remediation of contaminated areas. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 2004; 6(2): 119-24.
USEPA. Landfill Reclamation. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5306W)EPA530-F-97-001. 1997.
Oettle NK, Kavazanjian E, Rad N, Conkle C. Characterization and placement of municipal solid waste as engineered fill. In: Global Waste Management Symposium. San Antonio, Texas. 2010.
Read A, Hudgins M. Successful demonstration of aerobic landfilling-leading towards a more sustainable solid waste management approach Appropriate Environmental and Solid Waste Management and Technologies for Developing Countries (ISWA). İstanbul: Türkiye 2002.
RSMeans. Heavy Construction Cost Data. Gordian 2014.
Geyer R, Blass VD. The economics of cell phone reuse and recycling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2010; 47(5-8): 515-25.
Recycling E. Downstream of single-stream. Res Recycl North Am Recycl Compost J 2002; 2002: 1-3.
Johansson N, Krook J, Eklund M. The institutional capacity for a resource transition. A critical review of Swedish governmental commissions on landfill mining. Environ Sci Policy 2017; 70: 46-53.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Page: [17 - 34]
Pages: 18
DOI: 10.2174/2212717805666181031122517

Article Metrics

PDF: 19