Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation of Cross-flow Mode Operation of Membrane for Downstream Processing

Author(s): Anirban Banik, Tarun Kanti Bandyopadhyay*, Sushant Kumar Biswal.

Journal Name: Recent Patents on Biotechnology

Volume 13 , Issue 1 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Membrane filtration process produced good quality of permeate flux due to which it is used in different industries like dairy, pharmaceutical, sugar, starch and sweetener industry, bioseparation, purification of biomedical materials, and downstream polishing etc. The cross-flow mode of operation has also been used to improve the quality of the Rubber Industrial effluent of Tripura, India.

Method: The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of the cross-flow membrane is done by using ANSYS Fluent 6.3. The meshing of the geometry of the membrane is done by Gambit 2.4.6 and a grid size of 100674, the number of faces is 151651 and number of nodes being 50978 has been selected for the simulation purpose from the grid independence test. We have revised and included all patents in the manuscripts related to the membrane filtration unit.

Results: Single phase Pressure-Velocity coupled Simple Algorithm and laminar model is used for the simulation of the developed model and Fluent 6.3 used for the prediction of pressure, pressure drop, flow phenomena, wall shear stress and shear strain rate inside the module is studied for cross flow membrane.

Conclusion: From the study, it has been found that CFD simulated results hold good agreement with the experimental values.

Keywords: Computation fluid dynamics, downstream processing, membrane, wastewater, rubber industry of Tripura, cross-flow operation.

[1]
Das D, Saha A, Bhattacharjee H. Rubber processing is detrimental to environment: a case study. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 2016; 7(7): 369-76.
[2]
Li S, Zhang X. The study of PAFSSB on RO pre-treatment in pulp and paper wastewater. Procedia Environ Sci 2011; 8: 4-10.
[3]
Zhou Y, Zhao H, Bia H, Zhang L, Tang H. Papermaking effluent treatment: a new cellulose nanocrystalline/polysulfone composite membrane. Procedia Environ Sci 2012; 16: 145-51.
[4]
Mohammadi M, Man HC, Hassan MA, Yee PL. Treatment of wastewater from rubber industry in Malaysia. Afr J Biotechnol 2010; 9: 6233-43.
[5]
Mokhtar NM, Lau WJ, Ismail AF, Veerasamy D. Membrane distillation technology for treatment of wastewater from rubber Industry. Procedia CIRP 2015; 26: 792-6.
[6]
Saja S, Bouazizi A, Achiou B, et al. Elaboration and characterization of low cost ceramic membrane made from natural Moroccan perlite for treatment of industrial wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 2018; 6: 451-8.
[7]
Ghalloussi R, Chaabane L, Larchet C, Dammak L, Grande D. Structureal and physicochemical investigation of ageing of ion exchange membranes in electrodialysis for food industry. Separ Purif Tech 2014; 123: 229-34.
[8]
Oka PA, Khadem N, Berube PR. Operation of passive membrane systems for drinking water treatment. Water Res 2017; 115: 287-96.
[9]
Rashidi HR, Sulaiman NMN, Hashim NA. Batik industry synthetic wastewater treatment using nanofiltration membrane. Procedia Eng 2012; 44: 2010-2.
[10]
Hegab HM, Zou L. Graphene oxide-assisted membranes: Fabrication and potential applications in desalination and water purification. J Membr Sci 2015; 484: 95-106.
[11]
Zamani F, Tanudjaja HJ, Akhondi E, Krantz WB, Fane AG, Chew JW. Flow-field Mitigation Of Membrane Fouling (FMMF) vis manipulation of the convective flow in cross flow membrane application. J Membr Sci 2017; 526: 377-86.
[12]
Belfort G, Davis RH, Zydney AL. The behaviour of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in cross flow microfiltration. J Membr Sci 1994; 96: 1-58.
[13]
Zydney AL, Colton CK. A concentration polarization model for the filtration flux in cross flow microfiltration of particulate suspensions. Chem Eng Commun 1986; 47: 1-21.
[14]
Davis RH. Modeling of fouling of crossflow microfiltration membranes. Separ Purif Rev 1992; 21: 75-126.
[15]
Pak A, Mohammadi T, Hosseinalipour SM, Allahdini V. CFD modeling of porous membranes. Desalination 2008; 222: 482-8.
[16]
Alexiadis A, Wiley DE, Vishnoi A, Lee RHK, Fletcher DF, Bao J. CFD modelling of reverse osmosis membrane flow and validation with experimental results. Desalination 2007; 217: 242-50.
[17]
Cai JJ, Hawboldt K, Abdi MA. Analysis of the effect of module design on gas absorption in cross flow hollow membrane contactors via computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. J Membr Sci 2016; 520: 415-24.
[18]
Completo C, Semiao V, Geraldes V. Efficient CFD-based method for designing cross flow nanofiltration small devices. J Membr Sci 2016; 500: 190-202.
[19]
Bahiraei M, Mazaheri N, Alighardashi M. Development of chaotic advection in laminar flow of a non-Newtonian nano fluid: A novel application for efficient use of energy. Appl Therm Eng 2017; 124: 1213-23.
[20]
Bahiraei M, Khosravi R, Heshmatian S. Assessment and optimization of hydrothermal characteristics for a non-Newtonian nanofluid flow within miniaturized concentric-tube heat exchanger considering designer’s viewpoint. Appl Therm Eng 2017; 123: 266-76.
[21]
Bahiraei M, Gharagozloo K, Alighardashi M, Mazaheri N. CFD simulation of irreversibilities for laminar flow of a power-law nanofluid within a minichannel with chaotic perturbations: An innovative energy-efficient approach. Energy Convers Manage 2017; 144: 374-87.
[22]
Bahiraei M, Heshmatian S. Application of a novel biological nanofluid in a liquid block heat sink for cooling of an electronic processor: Thermal performance and irreversibility considerations. Energy Convers Manage 2017; 149: 155-67.
[23]
Bahiraei M, Mazaheri N. Application of a novel hybrid nanofluid containing graphene–platinum nanoparticles in a chaotic twisted geometry for utilization in miniature devices: Thermal and energy efficiency considerations. Int J Mech Sci 2018; 138-139: 337-49.
[24]
Banik A, Bandyopadhyay TK, Biswal SK. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of disc membrane used for improving the quality of effluent produced by the rubber industry. Int J Fluid Mech Res 2017; 44(6): 499-512.
[25]
Yoshida Y, Ohtsuka Y. Operating method for membrane separation device and membrane separation device. US10/010,834, 2018.
[26]
Santos JL, Gaspar F. Production of near monodisperse particles using milling and membrane separation. US9,937,470, 2018.


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 13
ISSUE: 1
Year: 2019
Page: [57 - 68]
Pages: 12
DOI: 10.2174/1872208312666180924160017
Price: $58

Article Metrics

PDF: 27
HTML: 2
EPUB: 1
PRC: 1