Protein Secondary Structure Determination (PSSD): A New and Simple Approach

Author(s): Anindya Sundar Panja, Bidyut Bandopadhyay, Akash Nag, Smarajit Maiti*.

Journal Name: Current Proteomics

Volume 16 , Issue 3 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Our present investigation was conducted to explore the computational algorithm for the protein secondary structure prediction as per the property of evolutionary transient and large number (each 50) of homologous mesophilic-thermophilic proteins.

Objectives: These mesophilic-thermophilic proteins were used for numerical measurement of helix-sheetcoil and turn tendency for which each amino-acid residue is screened to build up the propensity-table.

Methods: In the current study, two different propensity windows have been introduced that allowed predicting the secondary structure of protein more than 80% accuracy.

Results: Using this propensity matrix and dynamic algorithm-based programme, a significant and decisive outcome in the determination of protein (both thermophilic and mesophilic) secondary structure was noticed over the previous algorithm based programme. It was demonstrated after comparison with other standard methods including DSSP adopted by PDB with the help of multiple comparisons ANOVA and Dunnett’s t-test.

Conclusion: The PSSD is of great importance in the prediction of structural features of any unknown, unresolved proteins. It is also useful in the studies of proteins structure-function relationship.

Keywords: PSSD and DSSP, GOR and Chou Fasman algorithm, thermophilic and mesophilic proteins, propensity matrix, helix sheet and turn, statistics.

[1]
Hamelryck, T.; Kent, J.T.; Krogh, A. Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias. PLOS Comput. Biol., 2006, 2, e131.
[2]
Rost, B.; Schneider, R.; Sander, C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J. Mol. Biol., 1997, 270, 471-480.
[3]
Robson, B.; Suzuki, E. Conformational properties of amino acid residues in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1976, 107, 327-356.
[4]
Schwartz, R.M.; Dayhoff, M.O. In: Evolution of protein molecules, Ed. Matsubara, H.; Yamanaka, T.; Japan Sci. Soc., Press, Tokyo, 1978.
[5]
Garnier, J.; Osguthorpe, D.J.; Robson, B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1978, 120, 97-120.
[6]
Chou, P.Y.; Fasman, G.D. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry, 1974, 13, 222-245.
[7]
Chou, P.Y.; Fasman, G.D. Empirical predictions of protein conformation. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1978, 47, 251-276.
[8]
Kouza, M.; Faraggi, E.; Kolinski, A.; Kloczkowski, A. The GOR method of protein secondary structure prediction and its application as a protein aggregation prediction tool. Methods Mol. Biol., 2017, 1484, 7-24.
[9]
Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 1983, 22, 2577-2637.
[10]
Chen, H.; Gu, F.; Huang, Z. Improved Chou-Fasman method for protein secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006, 7(Suppl. 4), S14.
[11]
Rashid, S.; Saraswathi, S.; Kloczkowski, A.; Sundaram, S.; Kolinski, A. Protein secondary structure prediction using a small training set (compact model) combined with a Complex-valued neural network approach. BMC Bioinformatics, 2016, 17, 362.
[12]
Meng, F.; Kurgan, L. Computational prediction of protein secondary structure from sequence. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci., 2016, 86, 2.3.1-2.3.10.
[13]
Yang, Y.; Heffernan, R.; Paliwal, K.; Lyons, J.; Dehzangi, A.; Sharma, A.; Wang, J.; Sattar, A.; Zhou, Y. SPIDER2: A package to predict secondary structure, accessible surface area, and main-chain torsional angles by deep neural networks. Methods Mol. Biol., 2017, 1484, 55-63.
[14]
Faraggi, E.; Kloczkowski, A. Accurate prediction of one-dimensional protein structure features using SPINE-X. Methods Mol. Biol., 2017, 1484, 45-53.
[15]
Panja, A.S.; Bandopadhyay, B.; Maiti, S. Protein thermostability is owing to their preferences to non-polar smaller volume amino acids, variations in residual physico-chemical properties and more salt-bridges. PLoS One, 2015, 10, e0131495.
[16]
Kyngäs, J.; Valjakka, J. Unreliability of the Chou-Fasman parameters in predicting protein secondary structure. Protein Eng., 1998, 11, 345-348.
[17]
Kloczkowski, A.; Ting, K.L.; Jernigan, R.L.; Garnier, J. Combining the GOR V algorithm with evolutionary information for protein secondary structure prediction from amino acid sequence. Proteins, 2002, 49, 154-166.
[18]
Carter, P.; Andersen, C.A.; Rost, B. DSSPcont: Continuous secondary structure assignments for proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31, 3293-3295.
[19]
Piovesan, D.; Walsh, I.; Minervini, G.; Tosatto, S.C.E. FELLS: Fast estimator of latent local structure. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(12), 1889-1891.
[20]
Taguchi, Y.; Nishida, N. Secondary-structure prediction revisited: Theoretical β-sheet propensity and coil propensity represent structures of amyloids and aid in elucidating phenomena involved in interspecies transmission of prions. PLoS One, 2017, 12, e0171974.
[21]
Wu, W.; Wang, Z.; Cong, P.; Li, T. Accurate prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility using a balanced model. BioData Min., 2017, 10, 1.
[22]
Postic, G.; Ghouzam, Y.; Chebrek, R.; Gelly, J.C. An ambiguity principle for assigning protein structural domains. Sci. Adv., 2017, 3, e1600552.


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 16
ISSUE: 3
Year: 2019
Page: [246 - 253]
Pages: 8
DOI: 10.2174/1570164615666180911113251
Price: $58

Article Metrics

PDF: 20
HTML: 1