Evaluation of hMSCs Response to Sodium Alginate / Bioactive Glass Composite Paste: Effect of CaO/P2O5, Sodium Alginate Concentration and P/L Ratios

Author(s): Seyed Mohammad Ahmadi, Aliasghar Behnamghader*, Azadeh Asefnejaad.

Journal Name: Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Volume 14 , Issue 2 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Abstract:

Background: Bioactive glasses with different compositions have been extensively used as bone tissue engineering. Preparation, development and characterization of alginate pastes containing bioglass for bone repair applications were the purposes of this study.

Objective: The injectable bone pastes were produced from sol-gel derived bioactive glass nanoparticles with various CaO/P2O5 ratios of 19, 9.5 and 4.75 and sodium alginate solutions with different concentrations of 1, 2 and 4 wt.%. The effect of CaO/P2O5 and powder to liquid (P/L) ratios and alginate concentration on injectability, biodegradation, rheological properties, bioactivity and cellular behavior of the pastes have been studied. The behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in the presence of the pastes was assessed by MTT assay, biomineralization assay, ALP activity, Acridine orange staining and Alizarin red staining tests.

Results: By adding sodium alginate, the pastes exhibited a thixotropy behavior. The storage modulus of all pastes was larger than the loss modulus in the frequency range of 0.1-100 s-1. Cytotoxicity evaluation results revealed that there was a critical amount of bioactive glass in pastes which are above the limit; the viability of hMSCs will be at risk. The pastes made of bioactive glass nanoparticles with CaO/P2O5 = 9.5 and sodium alginate 1% with P/L ratio of 0.8 showed optimum behavior in terms of mineral carrying capacity, injectability characteristics, accellular bioactivity in SBF, loss weight and wash out behavior, proliferation and differentiation of hMSCs.

Conclusion: According to the results, the pastes prepared with sodium alginate solution and bioactive glass nanoparticles can be beneficial in bone tissue engineering.

Keywords: Nanocomposite paste, bioactive glass nanoparticles, sodium alginate, injectability, human mesenchymal stem cells, in vitro cellular behavior.

[1]
Armitage O, Oyen L. Hard-Soft Tissue Interface Engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015; 881: 187-204.
[2]
Fergal J. O’Brien. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Today Volume 2011; 14(30): 88-95.
[3]
Murdock MH, Badylak SF. Biomaterials-based in situ tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2017; 1: 4-7.
[4]
Hench LL, Wilson J. An introduction to bioceramics. World Scientific 1993.
[5]
Baino F, Verné E, Vitale-Brovarone C. 3-D high-strength glass–ceramic scaffolds containing fluoroapatite for load-bearing bone portions replacement. Mater Sci Eng C 2009; 29(6): 2055-62.
[6]
Baino F, Ferraris M, Bretcanu O, et al. Optimization of composition, structure and mechanical strength of bioactive 3-D glassceramic scaffolds for bone substitution. J Biomater Appl 2013; 27(7): 872-90.
[7]
Fu Q, Saiz E, Rahaman MN, Tomsia AP. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C 2011; 31(7): 1245-56.
[8]
Hockin HK. Xu, Michael D.Weir, Elena F.Burguera, Alexis M. Injectable and macroporous calcium phosphate cement scaffold. Biomaterials 2006; 27(24): 4279-87.
[9]
Heini PF, Wälchli B, Berlemann U. Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: Operative technique and early results. Eur Spine J 2000; 9(5): 445-50.
[10]
Friedman CD, Costantino PD, Takagi S, Chow LC. BoneSource™ hydroxyapatite cement: A novel biomaterial for craniofacial skeletal tissue engineering and reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 43(4): 428-32.
[11]
Tomita S, Molloy S, Jasper LE, Abe M, Belkoff SM. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements. Spine 2004; 29(11): 1203-7.
[12]
Keller TS, Kosmopoulos V, Lieberman IH. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty affect vertebral motion segment stiffness and stress distributions: A microstructural finite element study. Spine 2005; 30(11): 1258-65.
[13]
Kasperk C, Hillmeier J, Nöldge G, et al. Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20(4): 604-12.
[14]
Alves HL, Dos Santos LA, Bergmann CP. Injectability evaluation of tricalcium phosphate bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19(5): 2241-6.
[15]
Wang X, Ye J, Wang H. Effects of additives on the rheological properties and injectability of a calcium phosphate bone substitute material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 78(2): 259-64.
[16]
Wang X, Chen L, Xiang H, Ye J. Influence of anti-washout agents on the rheological properties and injectability of a calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 81(2): 410-8.
[17]
Jiang L, Li Y, Xiong C. Preparation and biological properties of a novel composite scaffold of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Sci 2009; 16(1): 65.
[18]
Couto DS, Hong Z, Mano JF. Development of bioactive and biodegradable chitosan-based injectable systems containing bioactive glass nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 2009; 5(1): 115-23.
[19]
Baroud G, Cayer E, Bohner M. Rheological characterization of concentrated aqueous β-tricalcium phosphate suspensions: The effect of liquid-to-powder ratio, milling time, and additives. Acta Biomater 2005; 1(3): 357-63.
[20]
Bohner M, Baroud G. Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes. Biomaterials 2005; 26(13): 1553-63.
[21]
Bonfield W. Hydroxyapatite‐reinforced polyethylene as an analogous material for bone replacementa. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 523: 173-7.
[22]
Yamamuro T, Hench L, Wilson J. Handbook of bioactive ceramics. CRC-Press 1990.
[23]
Sohrabi M, Hesaraki S, Kazemzadeh A, Alizadeh M. Development of injectable biocomposites from hyaluronic acid and bioactive glass nano-particles obtained from different sol-gel routes. Mater Sci Eng C 2013; 33(7): 3730-44.
[24]
Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, et al. Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C 2017; 78: 1246-62.
[25]
Venkatesan J, Bhatnagar I, Manivasagan P, Kang KH, Kim SK. Alginate composites for bone tissue engineering: A review. Int J Biol Macromol 2015; 72: 269-81.
[26]
Bidarra SJ, Barrias CC, Granja PL. Injectable alginate hydrogels for cell delivery in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2014; 10(4): 1646-62.
[27]
El-Rashidy AA, Roether JA, Harhaus L, Kneser U, Boccaccini AR. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models. Acta Biomater 2017; 62: 1-28.
[28]
Rahaman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, et al. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2011; 7(6): 2355-73.
[29]
Ahmadi SM, Behnamghader A, Asefnejaad A. Sol-gel synthesis, characterization and in vitro evaluation of SiO2−CaO−P2O5 bioactive glass nanoparticles with various CaO/P2O5 ratios. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct 2017; 12(3): 847-60.
[30]
Borhan S, Hesaraki S, Behnamghader AA, Ghasemi E. Rheological evaluations and in vitro studies of injectable bioactive glass-polycaprolactone-sodium alginate composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2016; 27(9): 137.
[31]
Kokubo T, Takadama H. How Useful is SBF in Predicting in vivo Bone Bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006; 27(15): 2907-15.
[32]
New N, Furuike T, Tamura H. The mechanical and biological propertiesof chitosan scaffolds for tissue regeneration templates are significantlyenhanced by chitosan from Gongronella butleri. Materials (Basel) 2009; 2(2): 374-98.
[33]
O’Neilla R, McCarthy HO. Critical review: Injectability of calcium phosphate pastes and cements. Acta Biomater 2017; 50: 1-19.
[34]
Sanchez C, Julián B, Belleville P, Popall M. Applications of hybrid organic–inorganic nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 2005; 15: 3559-92.
[35]
Gabbai-Armelin PR, Alves Cardoso D, et al. Injectable composites based on biosilicate® and alginate: handling and in vitro characterization. RSC Advances 2014; 4: 45778-85.
[36]
Bramhill J, Ross S, Ross G. Bioactive nanocomposites for tissue repair and regeneration: A Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(1): 66.
[37]
Sohrabi M, Hesaraki S, Kazemzadeh A. The influence of polymeric component of bioactive glass-based nanocomposite paste on its rheological behaviors and in vitro responses: Hyaluronic acid versus sodium alginate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014; 102(3): 561-73.
[38]
Liu C, Shao H, Chen F, Zheng H. Rheological properties of concentrated aqueous injectable calcium phosphate cement slurry. Biomaterials 2006; 27(29): 5003-13.
[39]
Srinivasan S, Jayasree R, Chennazhi KP, Nair SV, Jayakumar R. Biocompatible alginate/nano bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for periodontal tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym 2012; 87(1): 274-83.
[40]
Chen QZ, Thouas GA. Fabrication and characterization of sol–gel derived 45S5 Bioglass–ceramic Scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2011; 7(10): 3616-26.
[41]
Kazy SK, Sar P, Singh SP, Sen AK, D’Souza SF. Extracellular polysaccharides of a copper-sensitive and a copper-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain: synthesis, chemical nature and copper binding. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2002; 18(6): 583-8.
[42]
Cui X, Zhang Y, Wang H, et al. An injectable borate bioactive glass cement for bone repair:Preparation, bioactivity and setting mechanism. J Non Cryst Solids 2016; 432(A): 150-157.
[43]
Lu HH, Tang A, Oh SC, Spalazzi JP, Dionisio K. Compositional effects on the formation of a calcium phosphate layer and the response of osteoblast-like cells on polymer-bioactive glass composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26(32): 6323-34.
[44]
Phan PV, Grzanna M, Chu J, Polotsky A, et al. The effect of silica-containing calcium-phosphate particles on human osteoblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 67(3): 1001-8.
[45]
Kim EJ, Bu SY, Sung MK, Choi MK. Effects of silicon on osteoblast activity and bone mineralization of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biol Trace Elem Res 2013; 152(1): 105-12.
[46]
Shamsi M, Karimi M, Ghollasi M, et al. In vitro proliferation and differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts on nanocomposite scaffolds based on bioactive glass (64SiO2-31CaO-5P2O5)-poly-l-lactic acid nanofibers fabricated by electrospinning method. Mater Sci Eng C 2017; 78: 114-23.
[47]
Wang S, Gao X, Gong W, Zhang Z, Chen X, Dong Y. Odontogenic differentiation and dentin formation of dental pulp cells under nanobioactive glass induction. Acta Biomater 2005; 10: 2792-803.


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 14
ISSUE: 2
Year: 2019
Page: [196 - 210]
Pages: 15
DOI: 10.2174/1574888X13666180703141956
Price: $58

Article Metrics

PDF: 27
HTML: 4