A Cost-effective Modelling of Faster Authentication Mechanism in Vertical Handover for an Effective Latency Control

Author(s): S.B. Kumbalavati*, J.D. Mallapur.

Journal Name: International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control

Volume 9 , Issue 2 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background & Objective: Vertical handover is an inevitable operation demanded in the heterogeneous network to offer consistent connectivity to the user's device during migration from home to a foreign network. Existing literature still shows that there is a large scope for addressing the problem associated with providing seamless service if the latency issue associated with authentication is emphasized. Therefore, the proposed system introduces a very simplified architecture that acts as an external agent for collaborating with various forms of network devices that could exist in the heterogeneous network.

Methods: An algorithm is formulated that offers significantly faster authentication mechanism by considering two important attributes, i.e., latency and duration. Without using any form of complex cryptography, this proposed system proved that its architecture could successfully minimize significant delay along with proper retention of throughput.

Results and Conclusion: The study outcome has exhibited a computationally efficient vertical handover approach in contrast to the existing system.

Keywords: Algorithm, architecture, authentication, heterogeneous network, latency, vertical handover.

[1]
Chen S, Shi Y, Hu B, Ai M. Mobility management: principle, technology and applications Heidelberg: Springer 2016.Jun 22..
[2]
Tolstrup M. Indoor radio planning: A practical guide for 2G, 3G and 4G. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons 2015. Jun 22.
[3]
Dutta A, Schulzrinne H. Mobility protocols and handover optimization: design, evaluation and application Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons 2014.Mar 7.
[4]
Das SK. Mobile terminal receiver design: LTE and LTE-advanced. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons 2017.
[5]
Tinkhede P, Ingole P. Survey of handover decision for next generation. In: International conference on information communication and embedded systems (ICICES2014) Chennai, India: IEEE. 2014; pp. Feb 27. 1-5.
[6]
Wiharti W, Rimra IL, Novid I. A comparative analysis and survey of handoff for VoIP applications in mobile IPv6 protocols. In: 2015 2nd International conference on information technology, computer, and electrical engineering (ICITACEE) Semarang, Indonesia: IEEE. 2015; pp. Oct 16. 464-8.
[7]
Janevski T, Jakimoski K. Mobility sensitive algorithm for vertical handovers from WiMAX to WLAN. In: 2012 20th telecommunications forum (TELFOR) Belgrade, Serbia IEEE. 2012; pp. Nov 20. 91-4.
[8]
Kazi BU, Wainer G. Handover enhancement for LTE-advanced and beyond heterogeneous cellular networks. In: 2017 international symposium on performance evaluation of computer and telecommunication systems (SPECTS) Seattle, WA, USA: IEEE . 2017; pp. Jul 09. 1-8.
[9]
Agrawal A, Jeyakumar A, Pareek N. Comparison between vertical handoff algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2016 International conference on communication and signal processing (ICCSP) Melmaruvathur, India: IEEE . 2016; pp. Apr 6;. 1370-3.
[10]
Maaloul S, Afif M, Tabbane S. Vertical handover decision policy based on the end user’s perceived quality of service. In: 27th International conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops Barcelona. 2013; pp. 493-8.
[11]
Tuttlebee WH, Ed. Cordless telecommunications worldwide: The evolution of unlicensed PCS. Springer Science & Business Media 2012. Dec 6.
[12]
Ali-Yahiya T. Understanding LTE and its Performance Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.Jul 12.
[13]
Cao J, Zhang C. Seamless and secure communications over heterogeneous wireless networks Springer Science & Business Media; 2014. Jan 30.
[14]
Sesia S, Baker M, Toufik I. LTE-the UMTS long term evolution: from theory to practice. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.Jan 25.
[15]
Sauter M. From GSM to LTE-advanced Pro and 5G: An introduction to mobile networks and mobile broadband. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.Oct 23.
[16]
Tabassam AA, Trsek H, Heiss S, Jasperneite J. Fast and seamless handover for secure mobile industrial applications with 802.11 r. In: 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on local computer networks Zurich, Switzerland: IEEE . 2009; pp. 750-.
[17]
Kong Q, Lu R, Chen S, Zhu H. Achieve secure handover session key management via mobile relay in LTE-Advanced networks. IEEE Internet Thing 2017; 4(1): 29-39.
[18]
Liu CY, Leu FY, You I, Castiglione A, Palmieri F. The untrusted handover security of the S-PMIPv6 on LTE-A. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) Hong Kong, China: IEEE. 2015; pp. Apr 26. 161-6.
[19]
Vien QT, Le TA, Yang XS, Duong TQ. On the handover security key update and residence management in LTE networks. In: 2017 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE. 2017; pp. Mar 19. 1-6.
[20]
Chopra G, Jain S, Jha RK. Possible security attack modeling in ultradense networks using high-speed handover management. IEEE T Vehic Technol 2018; 67(3): 2178-92.
[21]
Salwe SS, Naik KK. Discrete image data transmission in heterogeneous wireless network using vertical handover mechanism. IET Image Process 2017; 11(7): 550-8.
[22]
Mahardhika G, Ismail M, Nordin R. Vertical handover decision algorithm using multicriteria metrics in heterogeneous wireless network. J Comput Netw Commun 2015; 2015(2): 1-8.
[23]
Bagdure N, Ambudkar B. Reducing Delay during Vertical Handover. In: 2015 International conference oncomputing communication control and automation Pune, India: IEEE. 2015; pp. Feb 26. 200-4.
[24]
Ali T, Saquib M. Analysis of an instantaneous packet loss based vertical handover algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 2014; 13(5): 992-1006.
[25]
Guo D, Li X. An adaptive vertical handover algorithm based on the analytic hierarchy process for heterogeneous knetworks. In: 2015 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD) Zhangjiajie, China: IEEE. 2015; pp. Aug 15. 2059-64.
[26]
Choi HH, Song O, Park YK, Lee JR. Performance evaluation of opportunistic vertical handover considering on-off characteristics of VoIP traffic. IEEE T Veh Technol 2010; 59(6): 3115-21.
[27]
Ali KB, Zarai F, Obaidat MS, Kamoun L. Enhanced MIH architecture-aware radio resource management approach in NGWNs. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on data science and data intensive systems Sydney, NSW, Australia: IEEE . 2015; pp. Dec 11. 611-6.
[28]
Ahmed A, Boulahia LM, Gaiti D. Enabling vertical handover decisions in heterogeneous wireless networks: A state-of-the-art and a classification. IEEE Comm Surv Tutor 2014; 16(2): 776-811.
[29]
El Fachtali I, Saadane R, ElKoutbi M. Vertical handover decision algorithm using ants’ colonies for 4G heterogeneous wireless networks. J Comput Netw Commun 2016; 2016: 4.
[30]
S. Kunarak. A Dynamic Channel Allocation Algorithm Based on Back-Propagation Neural Network for Vertical Handover in HetNets " 2016 UKSim-AMSS 18th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), Cambridge, 287-292, 2016.
[31]
Shanmugam K. A novel candidate network selection based handover management with fuzzy logic in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2017 4th International conference on advanced computing and communication systems (ICACCS) Coimbatore, India: IEEE. 2017; pp. Jan 6. 1-6.
[32]
Tian D, Zhou J, Qi H, et al. A bio-inspired QoS-oriented handover model in heterogeneous wireless networks. J Appl Math 2014 2014.
[33]
Ali W, Wang J, Zhu H, Wang J. An expedited predictive distributed antenna system based handover scheme for high-speed railway. In: GLOBECOM 2017-2017 IEEE global communications conference. Singapore, Singapore: IEEE 2017; pp. Dec 4. 1-6.
[34]
Bastos J, Albano M, Marques H, Ribeiro J, Rodriguez J, Verikoukis C. Smart interface switching for energy efficient vertical handovers in ns-2. IET Commun 2012; 6(14): 2228-38.
[35]
Marquez-Barja JM, Ahmadi H, Tornell SM, et al. Breaking the vehicular wireless communications barriers: Vertical handover techniques for heterogeneous networks. IEEE T Veh Technol 2015; 64(12): 5878-90.
[36]
Skondras E, Michalas A, Sgora A, Vergados DD. A Vertical Handover management scheme for VANET cloud computing systems. In: 2017 IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC) Heraklion, Greece: IEEE. 2017; pp. Jul 3. 371-6.
[37]
Gao Z, Chen C, Li Y, Wen B, Huang L, Zhao Y. A mobility load balancing algorithm based on handover optimization in LTE network. In: 2015 10th International conference on computer science & education (ICCSE) Cambridge, UK: IEEE . 2015; pp. Jul 22. 611-4.
[38]
Manfredi S. Cooperative load balancing algorithm in multiple bottleneck networks. In: 2013 XXIV International conference on information, communication and automation technologies (ICAT) Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina: IEEE . 2013; pp. Oct 30. 1-8.
[39]
Rym BH, Afif M. Load balancing policy for vertical handover between 3G/WiMAX. In: 2011 4th Joint IFIP wireless and mobile networking conference (WMNC 2011) Toulouse, France: IEEE. 2011; pp. Oct 26. 1-6.
[40]
Yadollahi M, Vakili VT, Ghaseminajm M, Jafarian A. Reducing processing delay and ping pong impact of multi attribute decision making handover for heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2015 12th International conference on telecommunication in modern satellite, cable and broadcasting services (TELSIKS) Nis, Serbia: IEEE. 2015; pp. Oct 14. 365-8.
[41]
Gamal AF, Mohamed K, Hesham ZB. A comprehensive approach to vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks. J Comput Info Sci 2013; 5( 2) 2013. : 197-205.


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 9
ISSUE: 2
Year: 2019
Page: [278 - 286]
Pages: 9
DOI: 10.2174/2210327908666180703100319
Price: $25

Article Metrics

PDF: 9
HTML: 1

Special-new-year-discount